High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Divorce Cannot Be Granted Merely on WhatsApp Chats: Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree Based on Unproved Electronic Evidence State Cannot Demand Settlement Amount Yet Withhold Legitimate Refund: Bombay High Court Strikes Down MVAT Settlement Order Surveyor’s Report Is Not Sacrosanct; Arbitral Award Ignoring Vital Evidence Is Perverse: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Insurance Arbitration Award When Victim Lives Under Exclusive Control Of Accused, Burden Shifts To Accused To Explain What Happened: Calcutta High Court Medical Evidence Clearly Indicating Suicide Cannot Be Overlooked, Prosecution Must Prove Homicidal Death Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Andhra Pradesh High Court 'Candidates Acted With Full Knowledge of Consequences': Kerala High Court Reverses Order for Refund of 10% Exit Fee in Medical PG Mop-Up Admissions Dispensing with Departmental Inquiry Without Material is Arbitrary: Supreme Court Sets Aside Dismissal of Delhi Police Constable Power Of Attorney Holder Authorized To Enforce Pre-Emption Right Can File Suit, Death Of Principal Does Not Bar Legal Heirs: Orissa High Court Government Servant Convicted In Criminal Case Can Be Dismissed Without Departmental Enquiry: Tripura High Court Upholds Teacher’s Dismissal RTI Cannot Be Used To Bypass Statutory Bar On Police Case Diaries: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Penalty Against Police Officers Externment Cannot Be Based On Police Report And Stale Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes District Magistrate’s Order Even Exonerated Accused Can Be Summoned During Trial: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Summoning Under Section 358 BNSS Benefit of Doubt Acquittal Not Equal to Honourable Acquittal: Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Police Constable Candidate Madras High Court Allows NEET-Failed Student To Appear In CBSE Class XII Mathematics Exam After Last-Minute Subject Switch By Parents Salary of Parents Cannot Be Used to Deny OBC Non-Creamy Layer Status in Absence of Post Equivalence: Supreme Court Father Who Rapes Minor Daughter Cannot Seek Leniency: Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment Construction Of Toilet Is Bare Necessity For Proper Use Of Premises, Expression "Own Use" Not Confined To Landlord's Personal Physical Use: Calcutta High Court 353 IPC | Conviction Cannot Rest On Uncorroborated Testimony Of Sole Witness When Other Evidence Contradicts Occurrence: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal 250 BNSS | 60-Day Discharge Period Is Procedural, Does Not Extinguish Accused's Right To Seek Discharge: Gujarat High Court Section 45 PMLA Cannot Become an Instrument of Endless Incarceration: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in ₹18 Crore Scholarship Scam Case Land Acquisition — Heirs Who Slept on Rights for 23 Years Cannot Claim Ignorance to Revive Dead Challenge: Karnataka High Court Institutional Hearing Is No Violation of Natural Justice: Kerala High Court Upholds BPCL’s Termination of Decades-Old Petroleum Dealership Witnesses Not Expected To Recount Past Incidents With Mathematical Precision, Minor Contradictions Don't Demolish Credibility: Orissa High Court If a Suit Is Ex Facie Barred by Limitation, the Court Has No Choice but to Dismiss It: P&H High Court

Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Summoning Order in Dowry Case: Cites Violation of Provisions of Section 210 Cr.P.C.

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Allahabad High Court on 11 Sep. 2023 set aside a summoning order against Mohammad Ayub Rizvi and Others in a dowry case filed by Smt. Salma Khan. The Bench headed by Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh questioned the approach of the lower court, highlighting that "the learned trial court ignoring the provisions of Section 210 Cr.P.C., proceeded in the matter and has summoned the present applicants under Sections 498A, 323 I.P.C. and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act."

The applicants had approached the High Court under Section 482, seeking to quash the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.942/18 under Section 498-A, 323 I.P.C., and Section 4 D.P. Act, along with the summoning order dated 13.9.2018.

During the proceedings, the applicants' counsel argued that there had been no proper inquiry or investigation before proceeding against them. They also emphasized the violation of Section 210 Cr.P.C. by the trial court. The counsel added that the summoning order lacked reasoning and had been "passed in a cavalier manner."

The court, in its judgement, agreed with the applicants' contention, stating that "the procedure prescribed under Section 210 of Cr.P.C. is very specific" and was not followed by the trial court. The judgement also cited the Apex Court’s verdict in the case of Abhijit Pawar Vs. Hemant Madhukar Nimbalkar and another, underlining that the "requirement of conducting inquiry or directing investigation before issuing process is not an empty formality."

The court thus concluded that the trial court's approach was not in line with the legal mandates, setting aside the summoning order and sending the case back for reconsideration.

The decision has been met with mixed reactions, but it underscores the judiciary's commitment to ensuring that legal procedures are rigorously followed before taking punitive actions.

 Date of Decision: 11 September 2023

Mohammad Ayub Rizvi and Others vs Smt. Salma Khan and Another

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Mohammad_Ayub_Rizvi_And_Others_vs_Smt_Salma_Khan_And_Another_11_September_2023_ALLH.pdf"]

Latest Legal News