Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

A Suit Barred By Res Judicata, Court Can Not Permit To File Fresh Suits: Kerala High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal decision, the Kerala High Court, through the honorable Mr. Justice P. Somarajan, has pronounced a landmark judgment redefining the parameters of res judicata and the permissible grant of permission for fresh suits within decrees. The case at hand, CRP No. 237 of 2022, involved a contentious issue of granting permission for a fresh suit within a decree, and the court’s observations are expected to have far-reaching implications.

The judgment clarified the fundamental principles surrounding the doctrine of res judicata, which ensures the finality of judgments and prevents parties from re-litigating settled issues. The court’s decision centered on the practice of granting liberty to file a fresh suit on the same cause of action within a decree, a practice that was found to be in violation of established legal principles.

In a noteworthy observation, the court stated, “The mere fact that the decree covers formal expression of an adjudication pertaining to ‘any of the matters in controversy’ as per the definition given under Section 2(2) CPC does not mean that the court can adjudicate some of the issues involved in the suit and leave open other issues within its competence for adjudication in a separate suit.”

This key observation underscores the court’s determination to uphold the sanctity of final judgments, asserting that a decree must conclusively determine all matters in controversy and cannot be a basis for initiating a fresh suit on the same cause of action.

Furthermore, the judgment addressed the significance of adhering to binding precedent, emphasizing that lower courts are obligated to follow established legal positions set by higher courts. The court’s decision to set aside an earlier order that failed to adhere to established legal principles reaffirms the importance of respecting legal precedents.

The judgment also displayed a commitment to dispute resolution through settlement, as the court granted a remand to explore the possibility of an amicable settlement. Parties involved in the case are expected to appear before the trial court on 25th September 2023, with a two-week window to reach a settlement. If no settlement is achieved within this period, the application challenging the suit’s maintainability will be allowed, resulting in the dismissal of the suit.

This landmark judgment not only clarifies the legal intricacies of res judicata but also underscores the significance of adhering to established legal principles, ultimately contributing to the efficiency and fairness of the judicial process.

Date of Decision: 22n August 2023

KARLOSE  vs STELLA LASAR

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Karlos_Vs_Stella_22Aug23_KerlHC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News