A Drafting Error Cannot Override Constitutional Rights: Rajasthan High Court Directs Correction In Udaipur Master Plan–2031 To Uphold Property Rights Uttering That a Woman Is a Prostitute in Public Can Amount to Abetment of Suicide: Bombay High Court Declines to Quash FIR Under Section 306 IPC PMLA | Stay on Predicate Offence Eclipses Money Laundering Probe; NBWs Cancelled for Cooperating Accused: Allahabad High Court Falsus in Uno, Falsus in Omnibus Not Applicable in Criminal Law: Patna High Court Mere Loan Default Doesn’t Justify Look Out Circular Without Criminality: Delhi High Court Rejects Bank of Baroda’s Appeal Consent, Not Calendar, Governs Divorce by Mutual Consent: Delhi High Court Says Separation and Cooling-Off Periods Under Hindu Marriage Act Can Be Waived Termination Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Gauhati High Court Quashes Railway Contract Rescission Right To Speedy Trial Cannot Override Statutory Bar Of NDPS Act: J&K High Court Denies Bail For Commercial Drug Offence Despite 3.5 Years Custody Inheritance Isn’t Lost in Whispered Settlements: Kerala High Court Says Oral Family Claims Can’t Defeat Sisters’ Equal Share Suit Barred by Law Must Be Dismissed at Threshold – No Evidence Needed When Limitation is Clear from the Plaint Itself: Madhya Pradesh High Court Admission That Plaintiff’s Gate Opens onto Disputed Land Clinches Case — No Ownership Proven, Common Passage Must Be Preserved: Punjab & Haryana High Court Axis Bank Must Refund ₹8.20 Crores Withdrawn in Violation of Trial Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Reasserts Judicial Supremacy Permissive Possession Is Not Adverse Possession: Punjab & Haryana High Court Overturns Ownership Claim Over Agricultural Land Registered Sale Deeds Carry Presumption of Ownership; Benami Plea Unsustainable Without Cogent Proof: Madras High Court Grants Partition Eligibility Criteria Must Have Rational Nexus With Objective: Orissa High Court Upholds ₹9 Crore Turnover Requirement In Hospital Diet Tender Mere Multiplicity of Ailments Is Not Ground for Bail Under UAPA: J&K High Court Dismisses Medical Bail Plea of Mian Abdul Qayoom Executing Court Cannot Direct Third Parties to Enforce Arbitral Orders Beyond Their Legal Limits: Delhi High Court Sets Aside CoA Order Against Jamia Hamdard Administrative Officer Can’t Question Validity of Registered Adoption Deed: Allahabad High Court Quashes Rejection of Compassionate Appointment Delay of Over Two Months in Eyewitness Disclosure is Inexplicable and Erodes the Core of the Prosecution’s Case: Bombay High Court Acquits Two Men Convicted of Murder Litigants Must Not Suffer for Clerical Errors Committed by the Court: Bombay High Court Allows Delayed Defence in Sibling Defamation Suit Courts Cannot Conduct a Mini-Trial at Cognizance Stage—Delhi High Court Upholds Summoning in SC/ST Act, IPC Case Involving Police Officer Liberty Cannot Override the Horrors of Lynching: Bombay High Court Denies Bail in Palghar Mob Killing Case Exorbitant Damages Without Proof Are Unsustainable: Madhya Pradesh High Court Strikes Down ₹3.84 Lakh Monthly Damage Order Against Industrial Occupant Specialization Cannot Be Used as a Tool for Harassment: Allahabad High Court Quashes Mid-Term Transfer of Law Officer for Violating Bank's Transfer Policy Delay in Passing Arbitral Award Not Sufficient to Invalidate It Unless Prejudice Is Proven: Bombay High Court Upholds ₹43 Crore Arbitral Award Against Director-Guarantor Builder Disputes Can't Be Dressed as Criminal Offences to Seek FIRs: Delhi High Court Dismisses Writ Seeking CBI Probe Against NBCC Mere Plea of Oral Partition Not Sufficient Without Corroborative Evidence: Karnataka High Court Plaintiff Cannot Claim 2/3 Share Without Proving Settlement or Joining All Co-Heirs: Madras High Court Manipulation of Public Issue, Ante-Dated Stock-Invests by Chartered Accountant Unbecoming of the Profession: Delhi High Court Suspends ICAI Member for One Year Allegations Show Continuing Offence— MP High Court Declines to Quash FIR Against NRI Husband, In-Laws Accused of Dowry Demands and Cruelty

A Suit Barred By Res Judicata, Court Can Not Permit To File Fresh Suits: Kerala High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal decision, the Kerala High Court, through the honorable Mr. Justice P. Somarajan, has pronounced a landmark judgment redefining the parameters of res judicata and the permissible grant of permission for fresh suits within decrees. The case at hand, CRP No. 237 of 2022, involved a contentious issue of granting permission for a fresh suit within a decree, and the court’s observations are expected to have far-reaching implications.

The judgment clarified the fundamental principles surrounding the doctrine of res judicata, which ensures the finality of judgments and prevents parties from re-litigating settled issues. The court’s decision centered on the practice of granting liberty to file a fresh suit on the same cause of action within a decree, a practice that was found to be in violation of established legal principles.

In a noteworthy observation, the court stated, “The mere fact that the decree covers formal expression of an adjudication pertaining to ‘any of the matters in controversy’ as per the definition given under Section 2(2) CPC does not mean that the court can adjudicate some of the issues involved in the suit and leave open other issues within its competence for adjudication in a separate suit.”

This key observation underscores the court’s determination to uphold the sanctity of final judgments, asserting that a decree must conclusively determine all matters in controversy and cannot be a basis for initiating a fresh suit on the same cause of action.

Furthermore, the judgment addressed the significance of adhering to binding precedent, emphasizing that lower courts are obligated to follow established legal positions set by higher courts. The court’s decision to set aside an earlier order that failed to adhere to established legal principles reaffirms the importance of respecting legal precedents.

The judgment also displayed a commitment to dispute resolution through settlement, as the court granted a remand to explore the possibility of an amicable settlement. Parties involved in the case are expected to appear before the trial court on 25th September 2023, with a two-week window to reach a settlement. If no settlement is achieved within this period, the application challenging the suit’s maintainability will be allowed, resulting in the dismissal of the suit.

This landmark judgment not only clarifies the legal intricacies of res judicata but also underscores the significance of adhering to established legal principles, ultimately contributing to the efficiency and fairness of the judicial process.

Date of Decision: 22n August 2023

KARLOSE  vs STELLA LASAR

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Karlos_Vs_Stella_22Aug23_KerlHC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News