High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Divorce Cannot Be Granted Merely on WhatsApp Chats: Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree Based on Unproved Electronic Evidence State Cannot Demand Settlement Amount Yet Withhold Legitimate Refund: Bombay High Court Strikes Down MVAT Settlement Order Surveyor’s Report Is Not Sacrosanct; Arbitral Award Ignoring Vital Evidence Is Perverse: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Insurance Arbitration Award When Victim Lives Under Exclusive Control Of Accused, Burden Shifts To Accused To Explain What Happened: Calcutta High Court Medical Evidence Clearly Indicating Suicide Cannot Be Overlooked, Prosecution Must Prove Homicidal Death Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Andhra Pradesh High Court 'Candidates Acted With Full Knowledge of Consequences': Kerala High Court Reverses Order for Refund of 10% Exit Fee in Medical PG Mop-Up Admissions Dispensing with Departmental Inquiry Without Material is Arbitrary: Supreme Court Sets Aside Dismissal of Delhi Police Constable Power Of Attorney Holder Authorized To Enforce Pre-Emption Right Can File Suit, Death Of Principal Does Not Bar Legal Heirs: Orissa High Court Government Servant Convicted In Criminal Case Can Be Dismissed Without Departmental Enquiry: Tripura High Court Upholds Teacher’s Dismissal RTI Cannot Be Used To Bypass Statutory Bar On Police Case Diaries: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Penalty Against Police Officers Externment Cannot Be Based On Police Report And Stale Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes District Magistrate’s Order Even Exonerated Accused Can Be Summoned During Trial: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Summoning Under Section 358 BNSS Benefit of Doubt Acquittal Not Equal to Honourable Acquittal: Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Police Constable Candidate Madras High Court Allows NEET-Failed Student To Appear In CBSE Class XII Mathematics Exam After Last-Minute Subject Switch By Parents Salary of Parents Cannot Be Used to Deny OBC Non-Creamy Layer Status in Absence of Post Equivalence: Supreme Court Father Who Rapes Minor Daughter Cannot Seek Leniency: Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment Construction Of Toilet Is Bare Necessity For Proper Use Of Premises, Expression "Own Use" Not Confined To Landlord's Personal Physical Use: Calcutta High Court 353 IPC | Conviction Cannot Rest On Uncorroborated Testimony Of Sole Witness When Other Evidence Contradicts Occurrence: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal 250 BNSS | 60-Day Discharge Period Is Procedural, Does Not Extinguish Accused's Right To Seek Discharge: Gujarat High Court Section 45 PMLA Cannot Become an Instrument of Endless Incarceration: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in ₹18 Crore Scholarship Scam Case Land Acquisition — Heirs Who Slept on Rights for 23 Years Cannot Claim Ignorance to Revive Dead Challenge: Karnataka High Court Institutional Hearing Is No Violation of Natural Justice: Kerala High Court Upholds BPCL’s Termination of Decades-Old Petroleum Dealership Witnesses Not Expected To Recount Past Incidents With Mathematical Precision, Minor Contradictions Don't Demolish Credibility: Orissa High Court If a Suit Is Ex Facie Barred by Limitation, the Court Has No Choice but to Dismiss It: P&H High Court

“Highly Qualified Spouse Not Entitled to Maintenance”: Delhi High Court Upholds Family Court’s Decision

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, September 12, 2023 – In a landmark decision, the Delhi High Court on Wednesday upheld a Family Court’s ruling that denied maintenance to a highly qualified spouse under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Hon’ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna, the court emphasized that “maintenance is not meant for those with high earning capacities.”

The appellant, identified as ABC, had sought interim maintenance of Rs. 35,000/- per month along with litigation expenses of Rs. 55,000/-. The appeal was filed against the Family Court’s order, which had declined her application for maintenance. She argued her case through Mr. Om Prakash Gulabani, while the respondent, known as XYZ, appeared in person.

The court observed that ABC is highly qualified, holding a Ph.D. in Management and professional qualifications in Computers. Moreover, the court noted her undisclosed employment status, stating, “Such a person cannot be held entitled to maintenance.”

Citing previous judgments, the High Court articulated that Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act is designed to support those who are “incapable of supporting himself or herself in spite of sincere efforts” and is not intended to “create an Army of idle people waiting for a dole to be awarded by the other spouse.”

High Court held that the appellant’s qualifications and capacity to earn disqualify her from receiving maintenance and thereby dismissed her appeal. This decision is likely to have far-reaching implications on maintenance claims, particularly involving well-qualified spouses.

Date of Decision: 12 September, 2023

ABC vs XYZ  

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/ABC_Vs_XYZ_12Sep23_DelHC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News