Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

“Highly Qualified Spouse Not Entitled to Maintenance”: Delhi High Court Upholds Family Court’s Decision

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, September 12, 2023 – In a landmark decision, the Delhi High Court on Wednesday upheld a Family Court’s ruling that denied maintenance to a highly qualified spouse under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Hon’ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna, the court emphasized that “maintenance is not meant for those with high earning capacities.”

The appellant, identified as ABC, had sought interim maintenance of Rs. 35,000/- per month along with litigation expenses of Rs. 55,000/-. The appeal was filed against the Family Court’s order, which had declined her application for maintenance. She argued her case through Mr. Om Prakash Gulabani, while the respondent, known as XYZ, appeared in person.

The court observed that ABC is highly qualified, holding a Ph.D. in Management and professional qualifications in Computers. Moreover, the court noted her undisclosed employment status, stating, “Such a person cannot be held entitled to maintenance.”

Citing previous judgments, the High Court articulated that Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act is designed to support those who are “incapable of supporting himself or herself in spite of sincere efforts” and is not intended to “create an Army of idle people waiting for a dole to be awarded by the other spouse.”

High Court held that the appellant’s qualifications and capacity to earn disqualify her from receiving maintenance and thereby dismissed her appeal. This decision is likely to have far-reaching implications on maintenance claims, particularly involving well-qualified spouses.

Date of Decision: 12 September, 2023

ABC vs XYZ  

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/ABC_Vs_XYZ_12Sep23_DelHC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News