MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

"Supreme Court Quashes Inconsistent Pay Scale Denials, Grants Retired Employees Long-Awaited Benefits"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant verdict, the Supreme Court of India has ruled in favor of retired government employees, quashing inconsistent denials of pay scale benefits and directing the State Government to extend the long-awaited benefits within a period of three months. The judgment, delivered by a bench comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Pankaj Mithal on September 13, 2023, addressed the discrepancy in granting University Grants Commission (UGC) pay scale benefits to retired employees and clarified the applicability of the judgment to similarly situated employees.

The ruling comes after a series of legal battles and a contentious history of denied benefits to retired government employees. The Court's observation emphasized the inconsistency in the application of government orders regarding pay scale benefits, highlighting that benefits had previously been granted to similarly placed retired employees.

"It is not in dispute that the case of Shri N. Ramesh in Writ Petition No. 5855 of 2008, decided by the learned Single Judge of Karnataka High Court on 13th February 2009, was similar to the present appellants. The learned Single Judge held that the said Shri N. Ramesh was entitled to the benefit of the revised UGC pay scale from 1st January 1996 based on the order dated 15th November 1999." [Para 6]

"We make it clear that this judgment will apply to all cases, pending before either the Administrative Tribunal or High Court, of similarly situated employees in which a similar relief is claimed. However, this judgment shall not be used to file new cases by retired employees who have been denied the benefit and who have not challenged the action till date. No case, which has been concluded, shall be reopened on the basis of this judgment." [Para 12]

The ruling brings relief to retired employees who have long been denied their rightful benefits and establishes a precedent for future cases of similarly situated individuals. It also highlights the importance of consistency in the application of government orders to ensure fairness and justice for all.

Date of Decision: September 13, 2023

B.C. Nagaraj & Anr. VS The State of Karnataka & Ors.           

                      

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/13-Sep-2023_B_C_NAGRAJ_VS_STATE-OF-KARNATKA.pdf"]

Latest Legal News