(1)
BALDEV RAJ AND ANOTHER …APPELLANTS Vs.
CHANDI DASS …RESPONDENT D.D
01/04/2023
HIGH COURTS
Civil Procedure - Regular Second Appeal - Section 100 CPC - Suit for permanent injunction to restrain encroachment - Trial Court dismissed suit for lack of proof of possession by plaintiff - First Appellate Court allowed appeal holding plaintiff in possession - Appellants claimed possession through acts of tying cattle and placing cow dung cakes - Such acts not considered proof of exclusive posses...
(2)
TARSEM LAL GARG—Petitioner Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS—Respondents D.D
29/03/2023
HIGH COURTS
Service Law - Eligibility for Promotion - AMIE Certificate - Petitioner reverted from Superintending Engineer to Executive Engineer due to lack of degree in engineering—Petitioner holds AMIE certificate, argued to be equivalent to a degree—Court held that AMIE certificate may be equivalent but is not a degree—Rules require a degree in engineering for promotion to Superintending E...
(3)
RASHPAL SINGH .....Petitioner Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. ....Respondents D.D
28/03/2023
HIGH COURTS
Grant of parole - Sections 21, 23, 28, 29, 60, 61, 63 of the NDPS - Challenge to declining order of parole - Whether declining order was ill-informed and not founded on credible material - Reasons given for denying parole based on mere apprehensions - No adverse report by Superintendent of Jail concerning petitioner's conduct - Order suffers from non-application of mind - Petition allowed and ...
(4)
NARESH KUMAR—Petitioner Vs.
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS—Respondents D.D
27/03/2023
HIGH COURTS
Constitutional Law - Writ Petition - Suppression of Material Facts - Criminal Antecedents - Petition seeking quashing of verbal orders not to report for duty and preventing replacement by another contractual employee—Petitioner failed to disclose involvement in a criminal case (FIR No. 178 dated 30.03.2017 under Sections 306, 420, and 406 IPC) and custody from 06.04.2017 to 13.09.2017—...
(5)
KARAMJIT SINGH—Petitioner Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB—Respondent D.D
24/03/2023
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Procedure - Quashing of FIR - Limitation Period - Excise Act - Petition for quashing FIR registered under Punjab Excise Act—FIR registered on 25.08.2016, challan presented on 23.02.2021—Cognizance taken barred by limitation under Section 75(2) of the Punjab Excise Act and Section 468 CrPC—Special sanction time exclusion plea untenable as limitation period had expired&mda...
(6)
Mohammad Asif - Petitioner Vs.
State of Haryana - Respondent D.D
23/03/2023
HIGH COURTS
Default Bail – Section 167(2) Cr.P.C and Section 36-A of the NDPS Act – Petitioner’s application for default bail dismissed by Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad – Revision petition filed challenging the order. [Para 1]
Factual Background – Petitioner arrested under Section 22(c) of the NDPS Act – Challan presented on 05.05.2022 without accompanyi...
(7)
DEEPAK ARORA AND OTHERS …PETITIONER(S) Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS …RESPONDENT(S) D.D
23/03/2023
HIGH COURTS
Municipal Law – Computation of Period for Requisition of Meeting – Writ Petition against State Government’s disapproval of meeting convened by dissatisfied councillors – Section 25(3) of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 interpreted to mandate meeting within 30 days from the initial requisition – Meeting held beyond this period deemed invalid – Petition dismissed &...
(8)
SOHAN SINGH GILL AND OTHERS—Petitioners Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB THROUGH INSECTICIDE INSPECTOR—Respondent D.D
23/03/2023
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Procedure - Quashing of Complaint - Limitation Period - Insecticides Act - Petition for quashing complaint for misbranded insecticide—Complaint filed after limitation period of three years—Sample drawn on 13.07.2012, analyst report dated 30.07.2012—Application for sanction submitted on 13.08.2015, sanction granted on 01.11.2017—Complaint filed on 05.01.2018—H...
(9)
BALKAR SINGH—Petitioner Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER—Respondents D.D
23/03/2023
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Procedure - Quashing of FIR - Proclaimed Offenders - Acquittal of Co-Accused - Petitions by foreign citizens for quashing FIR and orders declaring them proclaimed offenders—Petitioners were unaware of FIR—Co-accused acquitted—Common allegations of cutting and taking away 40 trees in a land dispute—Evidence found insufficient to prove exclusive possession or commiss...