Delhi High Court Frames Criminal Contempt Charges Against Advocate For Scandalizing Judge On LinkedIn After Cyber Cell Traces IP Logs Testimony Of Partially Hostile Witnesses Can Be Relied Upon If Corroborated: Delhi High Court Upholds Police Officer's Conviction Subordinate Engineers Entitled To Non-Functional Upgradation Even If Level 8 Reached Via MACP: Supreme Court FEMA Adjudicating Authority Cannot Overrule Competent Authority's Refusal To Confirm Asset Seizure: Supreme Court Candidate Cannot Claim Lower Preference Post After Securing First Choice Under Merit-Cum-Preference System: Madhya Pradesh High Court Official Cannot Escape Corruption Trial Merely Because 90% Payment Was Made Prior To His Joining: Calcutta High Court Employee Who Evades Cross-Examining Witnesses Cannot Later Claim 'No Evidence' In Departmental Enquiry: Andhra Pradesh High Court Fictitious Or Non-Genuine Revenue Entries Cannot Confer Adhivasi Rights Under UP Zamindari Abolition Act: Allahabad High Court Calcutta High Court Quashes Termination Of Compassionate Appointee Over Age Dispute, Says Such Claims Cannot Be Kept Pending Indefinitely Alleged Custodial Torture Does Not Automatically Attract Contempt Under 'D.K. Basu' Unless Specific Arrest Guidelines Are Violated: Gujarat High Court Authority Cannot Act As 'Judge In Own Cause'; Himachal Pradesh High Court Quashes Distillery License Cancellation Over Procedural Impropriety Financial Corporations Have Absolute Power To Fix Employee Pay, Prior State Govt Approval Not Required: Jharkhand High Court Custodial Interrogation Not Required For Police Inspector Accused Only Of Illegal Confinement Prior To Victim's Death: Karnataka High Court Rescission Of Contract Without Hearing Is Illegal; Courts Cannot Interfere In Second Appeal If Findings Rest On Unrebutted Evidence: Gauhati High Court RTI Penalty Proceedings Are Between Commission and SPIO Alone — Complainant Has No Right To Be Heard: Kerala High Court Catastrophic To Allow Law To Take Its Own Course: MP High Court Quashes POCSO, BNS FIR After Victim And Accused Marry No Presumption Under Section 20 PC Act Without Proof Of Demand And Acceptance: Telangana High Court Quashes Case Against Sub-Inspector Attack On Judicial Officers Is Criminal Contempt; Supreme Court Orders CBI/NIA Probe Into West Bengal Incident Prolonged Physical Relationship By Educated Woman Amounts To 'Promiscuity', Not Rape Induced By Misconception Of Fact: Punjab & Haryana High Court Father Cannot Escape Duty To Maintain Minor Children Merely Because Mother Earns Substantial Income: Uttarakhand High Court Divorced Wife Entitled To Maintenance; Mere Earning Capacity Not A Bar: Orissa High Court

"CRIMINAL LAW" Digest

Criminal Law – Child Pornography – Quashing of Criminal Proceedings – Appeal – High Court quashed the criminal proceedings against the accused under Section 67B of the Information Technology (IT) Act, 2000, and Section 15(1) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, citing that mere possession or viewing of child pornography without publication o...

Criminal Law – Murder Conviction – Appeal – Appellants convicted for murder and attempt to murder following an altercation – Trial court convicted the appellants under Sections 148, 302, 307 IPC read with Section 34 IPC and sentenced them to life imprisonment – High Court upheld the convictions – On appeal to the Supreme Court, arguments focused on the lack of e...

Criminal Law – Murder Conviction – Acquittal – Appellants (Accused Nos. 3 and 5) convicted by the Trial Court for the murder of Madhavrao Krishnaji Gabare – High Court sustained their conviction under Sections 302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC and Section 148 IPC – Appellants challenged the conviction before the Supreme Court – Court found discrepancies and cont...

 Facts:  The appellant, Sumedh Singh Saini, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged against him for offenses under various sections of the IPC, including section 302, based on statements from co-accused who were alloed to become approvers. The appellant contended that the present FIR was not maintainable as it was a second FIR on the same facts, and it was registered aft...

Facts: The petitioner, Amish Devgan, hosted a debate on a news channel about the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991. During the debate, he made derogatory remarks about Pir Hazrat Moinuddin Chishti, a religious figure, which led to the filing of several FIRs against him in various states. The petitioner sought the quashing of these FIRs and also requested the transfer of all case...

Criminal Law – Conviction under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC – Appellants convicted for dowry death and cruelty towards the deceased (Paramjit Kaur) – Trial court sentenced them to 7 years rigorous imprisonment under Section 304-B IPC and 1 year under Section 498-A IPC – Appellants challenged the conviction, arguing that the dying declaration was unreliable and there was no...

Criminal Law – Conviction under Sections 306 and 498A IPC – Applicant convicted for abetment of suicide and cruelty towards his wife – Trial Court sentenced him to imprisonment, and the conviction was upheld by the appellate court – Applicant argued that contradictory medical opinions (postmortem and chemical analysis) undermined the prosecution’s case and that there ...

Facts:  The appellant's daughter died an unnatural death, and the respondent-accused claimed it to be a suicide. However, the appellant lodged an FIR alleging that his deceased daughter was pressurized to bring money, and he had paid money on several occasions to the in-laws of the deceased. The Session Judge noted an incident where the deceased was allegedly assaulted by her in-laws, ...

Facts: The case involved an appeal challenging the denial of anticipatory bail to the appellant, who was the mother-in-law of a Muslim woman to whom triple talaq was pronounced by her husband. The appellant was accused under the provisions of Section.498A of the Indian Penal Code based on vague and general allegations in the FIR. Issues: Whether the provisions of Section.7(c) of the M...

Facts: The case revolves around an incident where the accused appellant and the main accused, Khilai, were involved in a quarrel with the complainant. During this altercation, Khilai fired a country-made pistol, injuring the complainant. The prosecution alleged that the accused appellant had a common intention with Khilai to murder the complainant.   Issues: Whether there was a...