Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

“Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court’s Conviction in Murder Case: ‘Chain of Circumstances Clearly Incomplete’”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On September 6, 2023 – In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India set aside the High Court of Karnataka’s conviction of the appellant in a murder case under Section 302 of the IPC. The apex court bench, comprising Justices VIKRAM NATH and AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, stated that the “chain of circumstances is clearly incomplete,” thereby allowing the appeal and discharging the appellant from the liability of his bail bonds.

The case revolved around the reversal of an acquittal by the High Court, which had convicted the appellant based on circumstantial evidence and the ‘last seen theory.’ The Supreme Court, however, found major discrepancies between the charge framed and the testimonies of witnesses regarding who was last seen with the deceased. “This raised doubts about the veracity of the statements and the application of the ‘last seen theory,’” the Court observed.

The judgment further noted that there was a significant time gap between the alleged last seen and the recovery of the body. “In the absence of corroborative evidence, it cannot be said that the chain of circumstances is so complete that the only inference that could be drawn is the guilt of the appellant,” the Court stated.

The Supreme Court also emphasized the principle of the presumption of innocence, stating that in cases of acquittal, there is a “double presumption in favor of the accused.” The Court added, “When two views are possible, the one favoring the accused should be preferred.”

Legal experts see this judgment as a significant reiteration of the principle that the burden of proof lies with the prosecution and that the accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

The judgment has been lauded for its meticulous examination of the evidence and its upholding of the principles of justice and fairness. With this decision, the Supreme Court has once again asserted the importance of a complete and unbroken chain of circumstances for a conviction based on circumstantial evidence.

Date of Decision: September 6, 2023

SREENIVASA vs STATE OF KARNATAKA 

Latest Legal News