Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Supreme Court Overturns Murder Conviction Citing Unreliable Confession and Evidence Mismatch

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India overturned the conviction of Prabhatbhai Aatabhai Dabhi, previously found guilty under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for murder. Justices Abhay S. Oka and Pankaj Mithal presided over the case, delivering a verdict that highlighted critical flaws in the prosecution's case.

The judgment, dated November 8, 2023, in the matter of Criminal Appeal No.1926 of 2011, emphasized the unreliability of the evidence presented by the prosecution. The Court observed, "Normally, an accused would not make a confessional statement before the real brothers of the deceased." This observation cast doubt on the prosecution's reliance on an extra-judicial confession purportedly made by the appellant to the deceased's brother and an acquaintance.

Further undermining the prosecution's case, the judgment pointed out inconsistencies regarding the murder weapon. While the prosecution claimed the appellant used a stick, evidence suggested the involvement of an axe, a disparity that the Court found significant. "The stick was not recovered," the Court noted, questioning the narrative presented by the prosecution.

A pivotal point in the appellant's acquittal was the discrepancy in blood groups found on his clothing. Contrary to the prosecution's assertion that the blood belonged to the deceased, forensic analysis revealed a different blood group, leading the Court to state, "This militates against the case of the prosecution that the blood stains on the clothes of the appellant were of the blood of the deceased."

The Supreme Court's decision to acquit Mr. Dabhi underscores the principles of criminal jurisprudence, particularly the importance of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The appellant, who had already served over 11 years in prison and was released on bail in 2011, was finally acquitted of all charges. This ruling not only brings closure to a long-drawn legal battle but also serves as a reminder of the judiciary's role in safeguarding the rights of the accused against wrongful conviction.

Date of Decision: 8th November 2023

PRABHATBHAI AATABHAI DABHI VS STATE OF GUJARAT 

Latest Legal News