Section 32 Arbitration Act | Termination for Non-Payment of Fees Ends Arbitrator’s Mandate; Remedy Lies in Section 14(2): Supreme Court False Allegations of Dowry and Bigamy Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madras High Court Upholds Divorce Plaintiff Must Prove Her Own Title Before Seeking Demolition Of Defendant’s Pre-existing House: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mismatch Between Bullet and Recovered Gun Fatal to Prosecution: Calcutta High Court Acquits Man Convicted for Murder Where the Conduct of the Sole Eye-Witness Appears Unnatural and No Independent Witness Is Examined, Conviction Cannot Stand: Allahabad High Court Fraudulent Sale of Vehicle During Hire Purchase Renders Agreement Void: Gauhati High Court Upholds Decree for Refund of ₹4.90 Lakhs Unsigned Written Statement Can’t Silence a Defendant: Hyper-Technical Objections Must Yield to Substantive Justice: Delhi High Court Default Bail | No Accused, No Extension: Delhi High Court Rules Custody Extension Without Notice as Gross Illegality Under Article 21 Gratuity Can Be Withheld Post-Retirement for Proven Negligence Under Service Rules – Payment of Gratuity Act Does Not Override CDA Rules: Calcutta High Court Cognizance Is of the Offence, Not the Offender: Madras High Court Rejects Challenge to ED’s Supplementary Complaint in PMLA Case Acquittal in Rajasthan No Bar to Trial in Madhya Pradesh: MP High Court Rejects Double Jeopardy Plea in Antiquities Theft Case 20% Deposit Isn’t Automatic in Cheque Bounce Appeals: Right to Appeal Can’t Be Priced Out: Punjab & Haryana High Court Checks Mechanical Use of Section 148 NI Act A Child Is Not a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets New Benchmark in Compensation for Minors’ Deaths 90 Days Is Not Sacrosanct – Courts Can Permit Reply to Counter-Claim Even Beyond Prescribed Time in Interest of Justice: Punjab & Haryana High Court Magistrate Can Proceed Only for Offences Committed in India Until Sanction Is Obtained for Acts Outside India: Orissa High Court on International Financial Fraud Award Is Vitiated by Non-Consideration of Material Evidence: Orissa High Court Sets Aside Industrial Tribunal’s Wage Award in IMFA Case POCSO | Absence of Child's Name in Birth Certificate Not Fatal: Kerala High Court No One Has the Right to Impute Illicit Motives to Judges in the Name of Free Speech: Karnataka High Court Jails Man for Criminal Contempt DV Complaint Cannot Be Quashed at Threshold Under Article 227: Madras High Court Refuses to Interfere, Directs Accused to Seek Remedy Before Magistrate Recovery Wasn't From Accused's Exclusive Knowledge — Cylinder Already Marked in Site Plan Before Arrest: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man in Murder Case State Can’t Block SARFAESI Sale by Late Revenue Entries: Secured Creditor’s Charge Prevails Over Tax Dues: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slams Sub-Registrar’s Refusal Providing SIM Card Without Knowledge of Its Criminal Use Does Not Imply Criminal Conspiracy: P&H High Court Grants Bail in UAPA & Murder Case Importer Who Accepts Enhanced Valuation Cannot Later Contest Confiscation and Penalty for Undervaluation: Madras High Court Upholds Strict Liability under Customs Act "Allegations Are Not Proof: Madras High Court Refuses Divorce Without Substantiated Cruelty or Desertion" When FIR Is Filed After Consulting Political Leaders, the Possibility of Coloured Version Cannot Be Ruled Out: Kerala High Court Mere Allegations of Antecedents Without Conviction Can't Defeat Right to Anticipatory Bail: Kerala High Court Section 106 Of Evidence Act Cannot Be Invoked In Vacuum – Prosecution Must First Lay Foundational Facts: Karnataka High Court Acquits Wife And Co-Accused In Husband’s Murder Case Parity Cannot Be Claimed When Roles Are Different: Karnataka High Court Refuses Bail to Youth Accused of Brutal Killing Injured Wife Would Not Falsely Implicate Her Husband: Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction in Domestic Stabbing Case Disputed Bids, Missing Evidence and No Prejudice: Delhi High Court Refuses to Intervene in Tender Challenge under Article 226 Setting Fire to House Where Only Minors Were Present is a Heinous Offence – No Quashing Merely Because Parties Settled: Calcutta High Court No Exclusive Possession Means Licence, Not Lease: Calcutta High Court Rules City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Evict Licensees Defendant's Own Family Attested the Sale Agreement – Yet She Called It Nominal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Specific Performance Renewal Not Automatic, No Evidence Of Notice Or Mutual Agreement: AP High Court Dismisses Indian Oil’s Appeal Against Eviction

Psychological Well-Being of Minor Paramount: Kerala High Court Orders Release from Child Welfare Custody

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


High Court directs child’s return to mother’s custody with strict conditions for protection and monitoring, emphasizes need for emotional support and counseling

The Kerala High Court has ordered the release of a minor girl from the custody of the Child Welfare Committee (CWC), emphasizing the child's psychological welfare and safety. The court's decision in the case WP(CRL.) No. 527 of 2024, presided over by Justices Raja Vijayaraghavan V and P.M. Manoj, highlighted the importance of a supportive and secure environment for the minor, who had been institutionalized following allegations of sexual offenses against her father.

The petitioner, the mother of the minor girl (referred to as Miss X for privacy), sought a writ of habeas corpus for her daughter’s release from the custody of the CWC. The child was taken into custody after a criminal case was registered against her father under Sections 376(2)(f) and 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, and provisions of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act. Despite the petitioner and the minor initially denying the allegations, the child was detained by the authorities. The petitioner argued that the allegations were false and the child’s detention was unlawful.

The court extensively reviewed the case records and the counseling report, which highlighted the significant distress and trauma experienced by Miss X due to her institutionalization. "The environment there appears to be exacerbating her emotional turmoil, which warrants immediate intervention," the bench noted.

The court emphasized the need for continuous psychological support and monitoring. "Given the immediate need for a supportive and secure environment, we are of the opinion that the child should be relocated to the One Stop Centre, Kakkanad (Sakhi) under the Women and Child Department," stated the judgment. This decision aimed to ensure that the Victim Rights Centre (VRC) could provide uninterrupted access to the child for counseling and support.

Considering the minor's upcoming attainment of majority, the court deliberated on the best course of action for her welfare. The bench decided in favor of reuniting Miss X with her mother under strict conditions. "The petitioner shall ensure that the child is not subjected to any physical or mental harm by any person whatsoever, including the father of Miss X," the court directed.

Justice Raja Vijayaraghavan remarked, "Further institutionalizing of the child is not warranted in the facts and circumstances of the case. The mother has stated before us during interaction that she shall ensure that the child is not subjected to any harm or trauma."

The Kerala High Court’s judgment underscores the judiciary’s commitment to the psychological and emotional well-being of minors in custody disputes, particularly in cases involving allegations of sexual offenses. By directing the release of Miss X to her mother’s custody with stringent protective measures, the court has set a significant precedent for prioritizing the mental health and safety of children in similar circumstances. The decision is expected to have far-reaching implications, reinforcing the need for comprehensive support systems for vulnerable minors.

 

Date of Decision: July 1, 2024

Xxx vs State

Latest Legal News