Madras High Court Dismisses ₹1842 Crores Recovery Claim by Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation as Time-Barred and Unsubstantiated Entertainment Tax Must Be Refunded on Unsold Tickets – High Court of Kerala Mere Non-Return of Money and Quarrel Does Not Constitute Abetment to Suicide Under Section 306 IPC: Karnataka High Court Double Presumption of Innocence Applies – Acquittal Cannot Be Overturned Without Evidence of Perversity: Gujarat High Court Consent Based on Deception is No Consent at All:  Delhi High Court Dismisses Plea for Discharge in False Promise of Marriage Case Employer’s Failure to Provide Records Cannot Deny Pension Entitlement: Calcutta High Court Orders PF Authorities to Consider Service Period for Pension Calculation Murder Conviction Set Aside as 'Sudden Quarrel'—Bombay High Court Modifies Sentence to Culpable Homicide" No Title, No Injunction: High Court Affirms Dismissal of Suit Over Baptist Church Land Exception 2 to Section 375 IPC Protects Husband from Rape Charges: Supreme Court Quashes FIR After Marriage Found to be Consensual Mere Presence in a Government Office Does Not Mean Incident Occurred in Public View: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under SCST A Typographical Error Cannot Alter Substantive Rights – Corrigendum Relates Back to the Original Notification: Rajasthan High Court Forfeiture of Earnest Money Must Be Reasonable, No Interest Payable If Buyer Cancels Due to Falling Property Prices: Supreme Court IBPS | Exam Bodies Must Provide Scribes and Extra Time to All Disabled Candidates, Not Just Those With Benchmark Disabilities: Supreme Court Minor Discrepancies in Witness Statements Do Not Discredit Their Reliability," Rules Punjab and Haryana High Court in Murder Case Suspicion, No Matter How Strong, Cannot Replace Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Karnataka High Court Acquits Two in Murder Case Prolonged Incarceration Violates Article 21 – Bail Granted Despite NDPS Act Restrictions: Kerala High Court Kolkata Book Fair Not a Public Function: Calcutta High Court Dismisses VHP's Writ Petition A Gift With Conditions is Not a Gift in Perpetuity – Violation of Purpose Mandates Reversion: Andhra Pradesh High Court Employee Cannot Demand Advocate in Domestic Enquiry Unless Employer’s Representative is a Legally Trained Mind: Bombay High Court Milkman as Scribe Raises Eyebrows: High Court Dismisses Property Claim Over Suspicious Will Contractor Bound by Contractual Terms, No Right to Claim Damages After Accepting Extensions: Supreme Court

Minor Discrepancies in Witness Statements Do Not Discredit Their Reliability," Rules Punjab and Haryana High Court in Murder Case

04 February 2025 2:49 PM

By: sayum


The court upholds life imprisonment for murder convicts, emphasizing the importance of consistent eyewitness testimony. On May 24, 2024, the Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the life imprisonment sentences of the accused in a high-profile murder case. The judgment, delivered by a bench underscores the paramount importance of consistent eyewitness testimonies, even when facing contradictory arguments presented by the defense. This decision reaffirms the lower court's findings and sets a significant precedent in handling cases involving contradictory witness statements.

Consistency of Eyewitness Testimony: The court emphasized the critical role of consistent eyewitness testimonies in securing a conviction. "In the present case, the eyewitness accounts have remained unwavering and coherent throughout the trial, providing a solid foundation for the prosecution's case," the bench noted. Despite attempts by the defense to highlight inconsistencies, the court found the witnesses' accounts reliable and credible.

Addressing Contradictions by the Defense: The defense argued that contradictions in the testimonies undermined the prosecution's case. However, the court observed, "Minor discrepancies in witness statements are natural and do not necessarily discredit the overall reliability of their testimony." The judgment pointed out that the core elements of the witnesses' accounts were consistent, which significantly contributed to the affirmation of the conviction.

The judgment delved into the principles governing the evaluation of eyewitness testimony. It reiterated that a conviction can be sustained if the testimonies are found to be trustworthy and corroborated by other evidence. "The consistency observed in the key eyewitness testimonies, coupled with the corroborative material evidence, leaves no room for doubt about the guilt of the accused," the court stated.

Justice remarked, "The coherence in the eyewitness testimonies, despite the defense's attempts to highlight contradictions, underscores the strength of the prosecution's case. Such consistency is crucial in ensuring justice is served."

The Punjab and Haryana High Court's ruling in this case underscores the judiciary's commitment to upholding justice through the reliability of consistent witness testimonies. By affirming the lower court's decision, the judgment sends a strong message about the weight given to coherent eyewitness accounts. This landmark decision is expected to have a significant impact on future cases, reinforcing the legal framework for evaluating witness testimonies in criminal trials.

Date of Decision: May 24, 2024

 

Similar News