Detention of Petitioner Would Amount to Pre-Trial Punishment: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail in Dowry Harassment Case Evidence Insufficient to Support Claims: Orissa High Court Affirms Appellate Court’s Reversal in Wrongful Confinement and Defamation Case Harmonious Interpretation of PWDV Act and Senior Citizens Act is Crucial: Kerala High Court in Domestic Violence Case Welfare of the Child is Paramount: Allahabad High Court Awards Custody to Biological Mother in Habeas Corpus Petition Due Process Followed Under Rule 3(b); No Error in Appointment Procedure: Calcutta High Court Denies Review in Temporary MMR Case Legitimacy Conferred by Section 16(1) of HMA: Madras High Court Upholds Partial Partition Claim Kerala High Court Voids Property Tax Demand Notices on Telecom Towers for Exceeding Limitation Period” Karnataka High Court directs government to pay compensation to long-term contractual employees in lieu of reinstatement and regularization. Execution Reports Are Crucial Before Issuing Non-Bailable Warrants: High Court of Jharkhand Quashes Warrants High Court Affirms J&K Bank’s Autonomy in Recruitment Policies, Suggests Inclusion of Ex-Servicemen” IT Act - Non-Issuance of Draft Assessment Order Renders Final Order Void, Delhi High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Rs. 2500 Crore Land Demand, Slams State for 'Commercialization Over Public Interest "Amendments Must Be Based on New Evidence, Not Repetitive Objections," Rules Himachal High Court No Error in Dismissing Petition to Call Original Agreement' in Cheque Bounce Case: Rajasthan High Court Affirms Trial Court’s Discretion Allahabad High Court Rejects Premature Divorce Petition Filed Within a Year of Marriage Allahabad High Court Rejects Premature Divorce Petition Filed Within a Year of Marriage Supreme Court Affirms Right to Horizontal Reservation for Disabled Candidates in Judicial Exams Patna High Court Upholds Rejection of Vehicle Release in Liquor Seizure Case, Cites Statutory Bar on Jurisdiction Pendency of Several Criminal Cases Cannot Be the Basis to Refuse Bail: P&H High Court in Counterfeit Currency Case “Consistency in Dying Declarations is Key to Conviction,” Rules Andhra Pradesh High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice: Sanction Not Obtained as Per Statutory Requirement Beneficial Legislation Like the DV Act Justifies Interim Relief Even After Prolonged Separation: Calcutta HC Defendant's Causal Approach Not Sufficient: Delhi High Court Dismisses Leave to Defend Application in Recovery Suit Mental Distance Between ‘May Be True’ and ‘Must Be True’” Requires Clear Evidence: High Court Overturns Conviction Leasehold Rights Expire with Lease Period: J&K High Court in Case Against J&K State Financial Corporation High Court Quashes Post-Retirement Pay Reduction: Emphasizes Natural Justice Revenue Authorities Have No Jurisdiction Over Title Disputes: Karnataka High Court Reaffirms 1938 Land Acquisition for Industrial Use NDPS | Extended Custody Unnecessary Where Seizure Is Intermediate and Investigation Concluded: Kerala High Court Adoption Severed All Ties with Biological Family – Madras High Court Upholds Legal Heirship Under Hindu Adoptions Act” Availability of Alternative Remedies Must Be Exhausted Before Seeking Judicial Intervention, MP High Court in Debt Recovery Case Balancing Speedy Trial and Justice: Additional Evidence Allowed,” says Orissa High Court in Death Penalty Case Recipient of Goods Can Seek Advance Ruling Under GST, Rules Rajasthan High Court Tender Terms and Conditions: Not Absolute, Cancellation Allowed in Public Interest: Telangana High Court Cancelled Tender for Redevelopment of Modern Abattoir Facility

Kerala High Court Voids Property Tax Demand Notices on Telecom Towers for Exceeding Limitation Period”

15 November 2024 12:37 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


High Court Sets Aside Demand Notices, Directs Municipalities to Reassess Within Statutory Time Frame

In a significant ruling, the High Court of Kerala has set aside property tax demand notices issued by various municipalities to ATC Telecom Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. For telecom towers, citing that the demands were beyond the statutory limitation period. The judgment, delivered by Justice Murali Purushothaman, mandates the municipalities to issue fresh notices for tax assessment within the permissible time frame, ensuring compliance with Sections 282 and 539 of the Kerala Municipality Act, 1994.

ATC Telecom Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (formerly known as Wireless TT Info Service Ltd., Essar Telecom Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., and Viom Networks Ltd.) filed multiple writ petitions challenging the property tax demand notices issued by various municipalities. These notices were related to telecom towers installed within the municipalities’ jurisdictions. The primary contention was that the demands were made beyond the limitation period specified in the Kerala Municipality Act, 1994.

The court focused on the statutory limitations prescribed under Sections 282 and 539 of the Kerala Municipality Act, 1994. Section 282 allows the assessment of escaped tax within four years from the date the person should have been assessed, while Section 539 bars recovery of tax beyond three years from the date of assessment. The court emphasized the necessity of adhering to these statutory time frames for valid tax assessment and recovery.

Justice Murali Purushothaman noted, “Going by Section 282 of the Kerala Municipality Act, the assessment of tax for a period could be done within four years from the last date of that Assessment Year. The demand notice could have been issued within three years of making the assessment.”

The court underscored that the demands made beyond the specified periods were unenforceable. It pointed out that the assessment of property tax for escaped assessment should be within four years, and any recovery of assessed tax must be initiated within three years. The municipalities’ failure to comply with these provisions rendered their demand notices invalid.

The High Court’s decision to set aside the impugned demand notices and remit the matters to the respective municipalities for reassessment within the statutory period signifies a reinforcement of adherence to legal frameworks. This ruling is expected to streamline the process of tax assessments and recoveries, ensuring that municipal actions align with the legislative provisions.

Date of Decision: 3rd July 2024
 

Similar News