Detention of Petitioner Would Amount to Pre-Trial Punishment: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail in Dowry Harassment Case Evidence Insufficient to Support Claims: Orissa High Court Affirms Appellate Court’s Reversal in Wrongful Confinement and Defamation Case Harmonious Interpretation of PWDV Act and Senior Citizens Act is Crucial: Kerala High Court in Domestic Violence Case Welfare of the Child is Paramount: Allahabad High Court Awards Custody to Biological Mother in Habeas Corpus Petition Due Process Followed Under Rule 3(b); No Error in Appointment Procedure: Calcutta High Court Denies Review in Temporary MMR Case Legitimacy Conferred by Section 16(1) of HMA: Madras High Court Upholds Partial Partition Claim Kerala High Court Voids Property Tax Demand Notices on Telecom Towers for Exceeding Limitation Period” Karnataka High Court directs government to pay compensation to long-term contractual employees in lieu of reinstatement and regularization. Execution Reports Are Crucial Before Issuing Non-Bailable Warrants: High Court of Jharkhand Quashes Warrants High Court Affirms J&K Bank’s Autonomy in Recruitment Policies, Suggests Inclusion of Ex-Servicemen” IT Act - Non-Issuance of Draft Assessment Order Renders Final Order Void, Delhi High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Rs. 2500 Crore Land Demand, Slams State for 'Commercialization Over Public Interest "Amendments Must Be Based on New Evidence, Not Repetitive Objections," Rules Himachal High Court No Error in Dismissing Petition to Call Original Agreement' in Cheque Bounce Case: Rajasthan High Court Affirms Trial Court’s Discretion Allahabad High Court Rejects Premature Divorce Petition Filed Within a Year of Marriage Allahabad High Court Rejects Premature Divorce Petition Filed Within a Year of Marriage Supreme Court Affirms Right to Horizontal Reservation for Disabled Candidates in Judicial Exams Patna High Court Upholds Rejection of Vehicle Release in Liquor Seizure Case, Cites Statutory Bar on Jurisdiction Pendency of Several Criminal Cases Cannot Be the Basis to Refuse Bail: P&H High Court in Counterfeit Currency Case “Consistency in Dying Declarations is Key to Conviction,” Rules Andhra Pradesh High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice: Sanction Not Obtained as Per Statutory Requirement Beneficial Legislation Like the DV Act Justifies Interim Relief Even After Prolonged Separation: Calcutta HC Defendant's Causal Approach Not Sufficient: Delhi High Court Dismisses Leave to Defend Application in Recovery Suit Mental Distance Between ‘May Be True’ and ‘Must Be True’” Requires Clear Evidence: High Court Overturns Conviction Leasehold Rights Expire with Lease Period: J&K High Court in Case Against J&K State Financial Corporation High Court Quashes Post-Retirement Pay Reduction: Emphasizes Natural Justice Revenue Authorities Have No Jurisdiction Over Title Disputes: Karnataka High Court Reaffirms 1938 Land Acquisition for Industrial Use NDPS | Extended Custody Unnecessary Where Seizure Is Intermediate and Investigation Concluded: Kerala High Court Adoption Severed All Ties with Biological Family – Madras High Court Upholds Legal Heirship Under Hindu Adoptions Act” Availability of Alternative Remedies Must Be Exhausted Before Seeking Judicial Intervention, MP High Court in Debt Recovery Case Balancing Speedy Trial and Justice: Additional Evidence Allowed,” says Orissa High Court in Death Penalty Case Recipient of Goods Can Seek Advance Ruling Under GST, Rules Rajasthan High Court Tender Terms and Conditions: Not Absolute, Cancellation Allowed in Public Interest: Telangana High Court Cancelled Tender for Redevelopment of Modern Abattoir Facility Supreme Court: “Mere Directorship Does Not Imply Liability” in National Housing Bank Case Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception: PH High Court Affirms in Suicide Abetment Case

High Court Affirms J&K Bank’s Autonomy in Recruitment Policies, Suggests Inclusion of Ex-Servicemen”

15 November 2024 12:42 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


Petition challenging exclusion of ex-servicemen from reservation benefits dismissed; court urges bank to consider future policy changes.

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh has dismissed a series of writ petitions challenging the exclusion of ex-servicemen from reservation benefits in the recruitment process for Banking Associates by the Jammu & Kashmir Bank. The judgment, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar, reaffirms the bank’s autonomy in recruitment policies while suggesting a review for future inclusivity of ex-servicemen.

The petitions were filed by groups of ex-servicemen aggrieved by Advertisement Notification No. JKB/HRD/Rectt/2020-73 dated July 2, 2020, issued by Jammu & Kashmir Bank for the recruitment of Banking Associates. The petitioners claimed that, as per the Jammu & Kashmir Reservation Act, 2004 and the Reservation Rules, 2005, they were entitled to a 6% horizontal reservation. They argued that the bank’s exclusion of ex-servicemen from these benefits was unlawful. The bank, however, maintained that its recruitment rules did not provide for such reservations, prompting the legal challenge.

Bank’s Autonomy in Recruitment Policies: The court upheld Jammu & Kashmir Bank’s stance that it, being an autonomous institution, is not bound by the reservation policies of the Government of Jammu & Kashmir. Justice Sanjeev Kumar emphasized, “The J&K Bank, governed by its own Articles of Association and Service Rules, is not obliged to follow government reservation policies unless explicitly incorporated in its rules.”

Horizontal Reservation for Ex-Servicemen: The petitioners contended that, as per the Jammu & Kashmir Reservation Act, 2004, and the Rules framed thereunder, they were entitled to a 6% horizontal reservation. However, the court found that the bank’s recruitment rules, specifically the amendments made on June 1, 2020, did not include ex-servicemen in the reserved categories.

Evaluation of Advertisement Notification: The court examined the advertisement notification dated July 2, 2020, and noted that while it referenced the application of reservation rules of the J&K UT, it clearly listed the categories for which reservations were provided. Ex-servicemen were not included in this list. Justice Kumar remarked, “Clause 8 of the advertisement notification must be read harmoniously with the given breakup of reserved categories, which does not include ex-servicemen.”

The court’s legal reasoning highlighted the bank’s discretion to frame its own reservation policies. The judgment clarified that the bank, despite being a public body, is not mandated to follow the reservation policy of the Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir unless it chooses to incorporate such policies into its own rules. “The petitioners have no vested right either under the Constitution or any other statute to claim reservation benefits in the bank’s recruitment process,” the court stated.

Justice Sanjeev Kumar observed, “The bank, as a ‘State’ within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution, must act as a model employer and consider the valuable services rendered by ex-servicemen.” He suggested that the bank introspect and potentially revise its policies to include reservations for ex-servicemen in the future.

The High Court’s dismissal of the writ petitions underscores the autonomy of Jammu & Kashmir Bank in determining its recruitment policies. While the judgment did not mandate the inclusion of ex-servicemen in the reservation policy, it recommended that the bank consider such provisions in recognition of the services rendered by these individuals. This decision is significant as it balances the bank’s autonomy with a call for inclusivity, potentially influencing future recruitment policies within autonomous institutions.

Date of Decision: May 3, 2024
 

Similar News