Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Once a Court Declares a Department an Industry Under Section 2(j), State Cannot Raise the Same Objection Again: Gujarat High Court Slams Repetitive Litigation by Irrigation Department “How Could Cheques Issued in 2020 Be Mentioned in a 2019 Contract?”: Delhi High Court Grants Injunction in Forged MOA Case, Slams Prima Facie Fabrication Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC Sole Testimony of Prosecutrix, If Credible, Is Enough to Convict: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Cheque Issued as Security Still Attracts Section 138 NI Act If Liability Exists on Date of Presentation: Himachal Pradesh High Court No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity Law of Limitation Binds All Equally, Including the State: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Review Petition with 5743 Days’ Delay Once Selected, All Are Equals: Allahabad High Court Slams State for Withholding Pay Protection From Later Batches of Ex-Servicemen Constables Non-Compliance With Section 42 of NDPS Act Is Fatal to Prosecution: Punjab & Haryana High Court Acquits Two Accused In 160 Kg Poppy Husk Case Unregistered Agreement Creating Right of Way Inadmissible in Evidence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Summary Decree in Partition Suit Denied: Unequivocal Admissions Absent, Full Trial Necessary: Delhi High Court No Court Can Allow Itself to Be Used as an Instrument of Fraud: Delhi High Court Exposes Forged Writ Petition Filed in Name of Unaware Citizen "Deliberate Wage Splitting to Evade Provident Fund Dues Is Illegal": Bombay High Court Restores PF Authority's 7A Order Against Saket College and Centrum Direct Anti-Suit Injunction in Matrimonial Dispute Set Aside: Calcutta High Court Refuses to Stall UK Divorce Proceedings Filed by Wife

Welfare of the Child is Paramount: Allahabad High Court Awards Custody to Biological Mother in Habeas Corpus Petition

15 November 2024 1:05 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


In a significant ruling, the Allahabad High Court has granted custody of three minor children to their biological mother, Smt. Seema, after she filed a habeas corpus petition. The court’s decision emphasizes the welfare and best interest of the children as the primary criterion in custody matters. This judgment reaffirms the principle that the mother’s right to custody is prioritized unless there are clear disqualifications.
The court first addressed the maintainability of the habeas corpus petition in child custody cases. It referenced multiple Supreme Court rulings, including Syed Saleemuddin v. Dr. Rukhsana and Nithya Anand Raghavan vs. State (NCT of Delhi), highlighting that a writ of habeas corpus is appropriate where a minor’s detention by a non-guardian relative is unlawful. The court stated, “Habeas corpus is a prerogative writ issued in exceptional cases where the ordinary remedy provided by law is ineffective.”
The court underscored that in custody disputes, the child’s welfare is paramount. Justice Saurabh Lavania remarked, “The welfare of the child must be decided on the consideration of all relevant factors, including the general psychological, spiritual, and emotional welfare of the child.” The judgment cited precedents such as Tejaswini Gaud vs. Shekhar Jagdish Prasad Tewari and emphasized that the mother’s natural ability to cater to young children’s needs should be prioritized.
The judgment discussed the principles of evaluating custody claims, particularly under the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act and the Guardians and Wards Act. It reiterated that the biological mother’s right to custody is a well-established principle unless she is disqualified by clear exceptions, such as living an immoral life or marrying a stranger. The court noted, “In matters of custody of a minor child, the mother is entitled to it until the child is of tender age, unless there be a clear disentitlement inferable.”
Justice Lavania emphasized, “The mother has always been regarded to be best equipped to take care of the needs of a young child, and secure his/ her welfare compared to a father.” He also highlighted that any other relative holding the child in custody while the mother is around constitutes unlawful custody unless exceptional disqualification applies.
The Allahabad High Court’s decision to grant custody of the minors to their biological mother, Smt. Seema, underscores the judiciary’s commitment to prioritizing the welfare of children in custody disputes. The judgment serves as a critical precedent, reinforcing that the best interests of the child supersede other considerations. It also opens the door for the respondents to seek visitation rights through appropriate legal channels. This ruling is expected to have a significant impact on future custody cases, emphasizing the fundamental role of the biological mother in the upbringing of young children.
Date of Decision: 14th June 2024

 

Latest Legal News