Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

High Court Rejects Bail in NDPS Case: "No Merit in the Petition, "Himachal Pradesh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Himachal Pradesh High Court, presided over by Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, dismissed a bail application in a high-profile narcotics case, emphasizing the seriousness of the allegations under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The case involved petitioner Rakesh Kumar, currently lodged at Model Central Jail Kanda, against the State of Himachal Pradesh.

In the judgment for case number Cr.M.P. (M) No. 1636 of 2023, Justice Thakur observed, "I do not find any merit in the petition," leading to the dismissal of the bail plea. The petitioner was implicated in a case concerning the recovery of a substantial amount of charas.

The Court meticulously examined the circumstances surrounding the petitioner's involvement. The petitioner's connection to the crime was inferred from financial transactions and Call Detail Records linking him to the co-accused, Kushwind, who was caught with 6.528 kilograms of charas.

The petitioner's counsel raised several grounds for bail, including alleged procedural breaches in collecting evidence and violations of the petitioner's right to privacy. However, the court noted that these aspects are to be evaluated during the trial and not at the bail stage.

Justice Thakur pointed out, "With respect to delay, it has been contended by learned Additional Advocate General that there is no inordinate delay in completion of trial because trial is likely to be completed within reasonable period of three years."

The court's decision underscores the rigorous approach adopted by the judiciary in matters involving drug trafficking, especially considering the societal impact of such crimes. The dismissal of the bail application serves as a reminder of the seriousness with which the courts view offences under the NDPS Act.

As the trial progresses, the focus will now shift to the substantive examination of the evidence and the arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defense. The case is a significant marker in the ongoing efforts to combat drug trafficking in the region.

 

Date of Decision:  : 11-12-2023

 Rakesh Kumar Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Latest Legal News