Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

"High Court Grants Bail in NDPS Case Citing 'Prima Facie Doubts' of False Implication"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, in a judgment delivered on October 30, 2023, granted regular bail to Balwinder Singh, who had been accused under Sections 15, 25, and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The decision by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN was based on observations that raised "prima facie doubts about false implication."

Balwinder Singh had sought parity with a co-accused, Jarnail Singh @ Toni, who had been granted regular bail earlier. Notably, no recovery was made from Balwinder Singh. The High Court considered a previous order granting bail to the co-accused Jarnail Singh.

The judgment also delved into allegations of false implication, highlighting the registration of an FIR against ASI Jagtar Singh and the reliance on a transcript of a recorded conversation. The petitioners were picked up from their homes, and a representation was filed alleging false implication. The court took into account the lengthy custody period and cited Supreme Court decisions in similar circumstances.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN, in his ruling, stated, "Having the conspicuous facts, further that no recovery is to be made from the petitioner(s), they are in custody since June 2021 and there is no substantial progress in the trial; the Supreme Court in Dheeraj Kumar Shukla's case (supra) and Chet Ram Ram Veer (supra) granted bail in similar circumstances, the petitioners are granted bail subject to their furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate concerned."

The decision comes as a significant relief to the petitioner, who had been in custody since June 2021. The High Court's judgment reflects the importance of ensuring fairness and justice in cases involving allegations of false implication.

Representing the petitioner was Mr. P.S. Sekhon, Advocate, while Ms. Navreet K. Barnala, AAG, Punjab, represented the State in this case. The judgment highlights the court's commitment to upholding the principles of justice and fairness in legal proceedings.

 

 Date of Decision: 30 October, 2023

 Balwinder Singh @ Rubi VS State of Punjab 

Latest Legal News