TIP Essential When Identity Based On Belated 'Alias' Claims; Conviction Can't Rest On Improved Witness Testimonies: Supreme Court Conviction Based On Flawed Identification Cannot Be Sustained In Law: Supreme Court Acquits Sri Lankan National In UAPA Case Penalty For Misdeclaration Of Power Capacity Is Strict Liability; No Need To Prove Intent Or 'Gaming': Supreme Court Authority To Appoint Includes Power To Dismiss; Visitor Can Terminate 'First Registrar' Under Transitional Provisions: Supreme Court State Cannot Use Delay Or Contractual Clauses To Deny Statutory Compensation For Land Acquisition: Supreme Court State As Model Employer Cannot Deny Regularization Benefits To Workers Due To Its Own Clerical Lapses: Supreme Court Section 106 Evidence Act | Husband’s Failure To Explain Wife’s Unnatural Death In Matrimonial Home Completes Chain Of Circumstances: Supreme Court Tender Condition For Out-Of-State Bidders To Submit EMD Via Demand Draft Not Mandatory If Clause Uses 'May': Supreme Court Affidavit Is Not 'Evidence' Under Section 3 Of Evidence Act Unless Court Orders Its Use Under Order XIX CPC: Supreme Court Exclusion Of Natural Heirs Not A 'Suspicious Circumstance' To Invalidate Will If Testator Provides Reason: Supreme Court 18-Year-Old Rendered 100% Disabled Entitled To Compensation For Loss Of Marriage Prospects And Dignity: Punjab & Haryana HC Right To Life Under Article 21 Prioritizes Preservation Of Mother's Life Over Reproductive Autonomy If Termination Poses Fatal Risk: J&K High Court Director’s Involvement In Company Affairs A Disputed Fact; High Court Cannot Conduct ‘Mini-Trial’ To Quash Section 138 NI Act Complaint: Punjab & Haryana HC Abuse Of Process: Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs Against Lawyer & Ex-Police Chief Sanjay Pandey; Says Complaints Motivated By Vengeance Magistrate Not Bound To Order FIR In Every Case Under Section 175(3) BNSS If Complainant Possesses All Evidence: Allahabad High Court High Court Can Initiate Suo Motu Inquiry Against Judicial Officers Based On Information; Sworn Affidavit Not Mandatory: Gujarat High Court Lack Of Videography, Independent Witnesses During Contraband Seizure Relevant Factors For Granting Bail Under NDPS Act: Delhi High Court

"High Court Grants Bail in NDPS Case Citing 'Prima Facie Doubts' of False Implication"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, in a judgment delivered on October 30, 2023, granted regular bail to Balwinder Singh, who had been accused under Sections 15, 25, and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The decision by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN was based on observations that raised "prima facie doubts about false implication."

Balwinder Singh had sought parity with a co-accused, Jarnail Singh @ Toni, who had been granted regular bail earlier. Notably, no recovery was made from Balwinder Singh. The High Court considered a previous order granting bail to the co-accused Jarnail Singh.

The judgment also delved into allegations of false implication, highlighting the registration of an FIR against ASI Jagtar Singh and the reliance on a transcript of a recorded conversation. The petitioners were picked up from their homes, and a representation was filed alleging false implication. The court took into account the lengthy custody period and cited Supreme Court decisions in similar circumstances.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN, in his ruling, stated, "Having the conspicuous facts, further that no recovery is to be made from the petitioner(s), they are in custody since June 2021 and there is no substantial progress in the trial; the Supreme Court in Dheeraj Kumar Shukla's case (supra) and Chet Ram Ram Veer (supra) granted bail in similar circumstances, the petitioners are granted bail subject to their furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate concerned."

The decision comes as a significant relief to the petitioner, who had been in custody since June 2021. The High Court's judgment reflects the importance of ensuring fairness and justice in cases involving allegations of false implication.

Representing the petitioner was Mr. P.S. Sekhon, Advocate, while Ms. Navreet K. Barnala, AAG, Punjab, represented the State in this case. The judgment highlights the court's commitment to upholding the principles of justice and fairness in legal proceedings.

 

 Date of Decision: 30 October, 2023

 Balwinder Singh @ Rubi VS State of Punjab 

Latest Legal News