At the Stage of Framing Charge, Presumption Suffices; Suicide Note and Grave Suspicion Enough: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Charge Under Section 306 IPC 173 CrPC | Framing of Charge Marks End of Investigation—Complainant Cannot Reopen Probe Merely by Citing Police Lapses: Bombay High Court Recovery Alone Cannot Prove Guilt: Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Photos, Videos Must Go: Supreme Court Binds Warring Spouses to Clean Up Social Media in Matrimonial Settlement Standard for Bail Under Section 319 CrPC Is Higher Than Framing of Charge, But Short of Conviction: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused Summoned Mid-Trial State Cannot Arbitrarily Deny Subsidies to 'New Industrial Units' by Retrospectively Applying Expansion Caps: Supreme Court Companies Act | Offence Under Section 448 Is Covered Under Section 447: Supreme Court Bars Private Complaint Without SFIO Nod “See-To-It” Obligation Is Not A Guarantee Under Indian Law: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope Of Section 126 ICA In IBC Disputes Mere Employment of Litigant’s Relatives in Police or Court Doesn't Prove Judicial Bias: Supreme Court Sets Aside Transfer of Criminal Case Reserved Candidate Availing Relaxed Standards in Prelims Cannot Migrate to General Quota for Cadre Allocation: Supreme Court Mere Vesting Does Not Mean Possession: Supreme Court Rules ULC Proceedings Abated For Failure To Serve Mandatory Notice To Actual Occupants Contempt of Courts Act | Natural Justice in Administrative Action: Supreme Court Directs West Bengal Govt to Re-Adjudicate Teachers' Arrears Claims Live-In Relationship with Married Man Not a ‘Relationship in the Nature of Marriage’ Under Domestic Violence Act: Bombay High Court Applies Supreme Court Guidelines Income Tax Act | Substitution of Shares held as Stock-in-Trade upon Amalgamation constitutes Taxable Business Income if Commercially Realisable: Supreme Court Judges Cannot Enact Their Own Protocols During Bail Hearings: Supreme Court Sets Aside Sweeping Age Determination Directions In POCSO If There Is Knowledge That Injury Is Likely To Cause Death, But No Intention Falls Under Section 304 Part II:  Supreme Court High Court Ignored POCSO’s Statutory Rigour, Committed Grave Error in Granting Bail: Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Gang-Rape Accused Section 22 HSA | Co-Heirs Have Statutory Right of Pre-Emption Even in Urban Property: Punjab & Haryana High Court 138 NI Act | Issuance of Separate Cheques Gives Rise to Independent Causes of Action, Even if Drawn for Same Underlying Transaction: Supreme Court

Gravity of Offence Overweighs Right to Education: Delhi High Court Denies Interim Bail to PhD Student in Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court has denied interim bail to Varun, a 23-year-old PhD student, charged under Sections 302, 307, and 34 of the IPC for his alleged involvement in a murder case. Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar, presiding over the case, emphasized the severity of the charges against the petitioner, stating, “Gravity of the offence overweighs the right to education,” marking a crucial consideration in bail applications involving serious offences.

The petitioner, currently In judicial custody, sought interim bail for three months to attend his regular classes at the University of Gujarat. His request was based on the necessity to continue his education, a point previously accommodated by the court through short-term interim bail for entrance exams and document verification.

In his ruling, Justice Bhatnagar referenced the significant difference in circumstances between the current case and those cited by the petitioner, notably cases from the Kerala High Court and Delhi High Court, which had granted interim bail. He pointed out that those cases involved facilities like video conferencing, a provision not applicable in the present scenario. “The situation would have been different if there was any facility of video conferencing for attending the PHD classes,” Justice Bhatnagar noted, underscoring the unique considerations of each bail application.

Further, the court expressed concerns about the potential threat to the complainant and witnesses, a factor significantly influencing the decision. The court’s apprehension was evident as it noted, “Granting petitioner interim bail for such a long period of 3 months will hamper the trial.”

Date of Decision: 22nd November 2023

VARUN VS STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

Latest Legal News