Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Tribunal’s Compensation Exceeding Claimed Amount Found Just and Fair Under Motor Vehicles Act: No Deduction Errors Warrant Reduction: Gujrat High Court    |     When Two Accused Face Identical Charges, One Cannot Be Convicted While the Other is Acquitted: Supreme Court Emphasizes Principle of Parity in Acquittal    |     Supreme Court Limits Interim Protection for Financial Institutions, Modifies Order on FIRs Filed by Borrowers    |     Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail in Methamphetamine Case After Delay in Chemical Analysis Report    |     No Sign of Recent Intercourse; No Injury Was Found On Her Body Or Private Parts: Gauhati High Court Acquits Two In Gang Rape Case    |     Failure to Disclose Relationship with Key Stakeholder Led to Setting Aside of Arbitral Award: Gujarat High Court    |     Strict Compliance with UAPA's 7-Day Timeline for Sanctions is Essential:  Supreme Court    |     PAT Teachers Entitled to Regularization from 2014, Quashes Prospective Regularization as Arbitrary: Himachal Pradesh High Court    |     Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Anonymity Protections for Victims in Sensitive Cases: Right to Privacy Prevails Over Right to Information    |     Certified Copy of Will Admissible Under Registration Act, 1908: Allahabad HC Dismisses Plea for Production of Original Will    |     Injuries on Non-Vital Parts Do Not Warrant Conviction for Attempt to Murder: Madhya Pradesh High Court Modifies Conviction Under Section 307 IPC to Section 326 IPC    |     Classification Based on Wikipedia Data Inadmissible; Tribunal to Reassess Using Actual Financial Records: PH High Court Orders Reconsideration of Wage Dispute    |     Mere Delay in Initiation Does Not Justify Reduction of Damages: Jharkhand High Court on Provident Fund Defaults    |     Legatee Can Continue Suit Without Probate, But Decree Contingent on Probate Approval: Orissa High Court    |     An Award that Shocks the Conscience of the Court Cannot Stand, Especially When Public Money is Involved: Calcutta HC Reduces Quantum by Half    |     Trademark Transaction Within Territoriality Principle Subject to Indian Tax Laws: Bombay High Court Dismisses Hindustan Unilever's Petition on Non-Deduction of TDS    |     Concealment of Material Facts Bars Relief under Article 226: SC Reprimands Petitioners for Lack of Bonafides    |     Without Determination of the Will's Genuineness, Partition is Impossible: Supreme Court on Liberal Approach to Pleading Amendments    |     Candidates Cannot Challenge a Selection Process After Participating Without Protest : Delhi High Court Upholds ISRO's Administrative Officer Recruitment    |     Invalid Bank Guarantee Invocation Found Fatal to Recovery Claim: Delhi High Court Dismisses GAIL’s Appeal    |     Adverse Remarks in APAR Recorded Without Objectivity and Likely Motivated by Bias: Delhi High Court Quashes Biased APAR Downgrade of CRPF Officer    |    

Gravity of Offence Overweighs Right to Education: Delhi High Court Denies Interim Bail to PhD Student in Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court has denied interim bail to Varun, a 23-year-old PhD student, charged under Sections 302, 307, and 34 of the IPC for his alleged involvement in a murder case. Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar, presiding over the case, emphasized the severity of the charges against the petitioner, stating, “Gravity of the offence overweighs the right to education,” marking a crucial consideration in bail applications involving serious offences.

The petitioner, currently In judicial custody, sought interim bail for three months to attend his regular classes at the University of Gujarat. His request was based on the necessity to continue his education, a point previously accommodated by the court through short-term interim bail for entrance exams and document verification.

In his ruling, Justice Bhatnagar referenced the significant difference in circumstances between the current case and those cited by the petitioner, notably cases from the Kerala High Court and Delhi High Court, which had granted interim bail. He pointed out that those cases involved facilities like video conferencing, a provision not applicable in the present scenario. “The situation would have been different if there was any facility of video conferencing for attending the PHD classes,” Justice Bhatnagar noted, underscoring the unique considerations of each bail application.

Further, the court expressed concerns about the potential threat to the complainant and witnesses, a factor significantly influencing the decision. The court’s apprehension was evident as it noted, “Granting petitioner interim bail for such a long period of 3 months will hamper the trial.”

Date of Decision: 22nd November 2023

VARUN VS STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

Similar News