Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court Limitation | 1,142 Days of Silence: Orissa High Court Rejects Litigant's Claim That His Lawyer Never Called SC/ST Act's Bar on Anticipatory Bail Does Not Apply When Complaint Fails to Make Out Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Oral Agreement for Sale Cannot Be Dismissed for Want of Stamp or Registration: Calcutta High Court Upholds Injunction Finance Company's Own Legal Manager Cannot Appoint Arbitrator — Award Passed by Such Arbitrator Is Non-Est and Inexecutable: Andhra Pradesh High Court District Court Cannot Remand Charity Commissioner's Order: Bombay High Court Division Bench Settles Conflicting Views Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court Contributory Negligence | No Driving Licence and Three on a Motorcycle Cannot Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Rajasthan High Court LL.B Degree Cannot Be Ground to Deny Maintenance to Divorced Wife: Gujarat High Court Dried Leaves and Branches Are Not 'Ganja': Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under NDPS Act Family Court Judge Secretly Compared Handwriting Without Telling Wife, Then Punished Her Hesitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Divorce Decree Co-Owner Can Sell Undivided Share in Joint Property Without Consent of Other Co-owners — Sale Deed Valid to Extent of Transferor's Share: Orissa High Court Mandatory Safeguards of Section 42 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed — Even When 1329 Kg of Hashish Is Seized: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal

Discriminatory Denial of Promotion Contrary to Article 14: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's order, ruling that the denial of an 'Out of Turn Promotion' to Harinder Singh was discriminatory and contrary to Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

"Discriminatory denial of promotion, despite parity in service merits with Constable Joginder Singh, observed as violative of Article 14 of the Constitution," observed the High Court in its judgement.

Harinder Singh, a policeman with commendable service, sought an 'Out of Turn Promotion' after his colleague, Constable Joginder Singh, was promoted for similar achievements. A pending criminal case had initially hampered Singh's chances, but it was later quashed by the High Court. Despite this, he was only awarded an 'Asadharan Karya Puraskar' instead of the promotion he sought.

The Central Administrative Tribunal had initially ruled in favor of Singh, stating that the denial was discriminatory. "No adverse inference could be drawn against the petitioner to deny 'Out of Turn Promotion'. The quashing of proceedings acknowledged as rendering a person acquitted for all intents and purposes, negating adverse implications on promotion eligibility," stated the Tribunal.

The High Court affirmed the Tribunal's decision, stressing that competent authorities must act "reasonably, fairly, and in public interest" when considering promotions. The court emphasized that such decisions must withstand the "constitutional guarantee of equality under Article 14."

The High Court's decision sets a precedent that could impact similar cases where 'Out of Turn Promotions' have been denied due to pending or quashed criminal cases. It reaffirms the judiciary's role in upholding constitutional guarantees against discrimination.

The court also directed that the 'Out of Turn Promotion' for Harinder Singh should date back to when the proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. were filed, dismissing writ petitions from both Singh and the Commissioner of Police & Ors.

Date of Decision: 31.10.2023

COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS. VS HARINDER SINGH        

Latest Legal News