Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court 'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Discriminatory Denial of Promotion Contrary to Article 14: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's order, ruling that the denial of an 'Out of Turn Promotion' to Harinder Singh was discriminatory and contrary to Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

"Discriminatory denial of promotion, despite parity in service merits with Constable Joginder Singh, observed as violative of Article 14 of the Constitution," observed the High Court in its judgement.

Harinder Singh, a policeman with commendable service, sought an 'Out of Turn Promotion' after his colleague, Constable Joginder Singh, was promoted for similar achievements. A pending criminal case had initially hampered Singh's chances, but it was later quashed by the High Court. Despite this, he was only awarded an 'Asadharan Karya Puraskar' instead of the promotion he sought.

The Central Administrative Tribunal had initially ruled in favor of Singh, stating that the denial was discriminatory. "No adverse inference could be drawn against the petitioner to deny 'Out of Turn Promotion'. The quashing of proceedings acknowledged as rendering a person acquitted for all intents and purposes, negating adverse implications on promotion eligibility," stated the Tribunal.

The High Court affirmed the Tribunal's decision, stressing that competent authorities must act "reasonably, fairly, and in public interest" when considering promotions. The court emphasized that such decisions must withstand the "constitutional guarantee of equality under Article 14."

The High Court's decision sets a precedent that could impact similar cases where 'Out of Turn Promotions' have been denied due to pending or quashed criminal cases. It reaffirms the judiciary's role in upholding constitutional guarantees against discrimination.

The court also directed that the 'Out of Turn Promotion' for Harinder Singh should date back to when the proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. were filed, dismissing writ petitions from both Singh and the Commissioner of Police & Ors.

Date of Decision: 31.10.2023

COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS. VS HARINDER SINGH        

Latest Legal News