TIP Essential When Identity Based On Belated 'Alias' Claims; Conviction Can't Rest On Improved Witness Testimonies: Supreme Court Conviction Based On Flawed Identification Cannot Be Sustained In Law: Supreme Court Acquits Sri Lankan National In UAPA Case Penalty For Misdeclaration Of Power Capacity Is Strict Liability; No Need To Prove Intent Or 'Gaming': Supreme Court Authority To Appoint Includes Power To Dismiss; Visitor Can Terminate 'First Registrar' Under Transitional Provisions: Supreme Court State Cannot Use Delay Or Contractual Clauses To Deny Statutory Compensation For Land Acquisition: Supreme Court State As Model Employer Cannot Deny Regularization Benefits To Workers Due To Its Own Clerical Lapses: Supreme Court Section 106 Evidence Act | Husband’s Failure To Explain Wife’s Unnatural Death In Matrimonial Home Completes Chain Of Circumstances: Supreme Court Tender Condition For Out-Of-State Bidders To Submit EMD Via Demand Draft Not Mandatory If Clause Uses 'May': Supreme Court Affidavit Is Not 'Evidence' Under Section 3 Of Evidence Act Unless Court Orders Its Use Under Order XIX CPC: Supreme Court Exclusion Of Natural Heirs Not A 'Suspicious Circumstance' To Invalidate Will If Testator Provides Reason: Supreme Court 18-Year-Old Rendered 100% Disabled Entitled To Compensation For Loss Of Marriage Prospects And Dignity: Punjab & Haryana HC Right To Life Under Article 21 Prioritizes Preservation Of Mother's Life Over Reproductive Autonomy If Termination Poses Fatal Risk: J&K High Court Director’s Involvement In Company Affairs A Disputed Fact; High Court Cannot Conduct ‘Mini-Trial’ To Quash Section 138 NI Act Complaint: Punjab & Haryana HC Abuse Of Process: Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs Against Lawyer & Ex-Police Chief Sanjay Pandey; Says Complaints Motivated By Vengeance Magistrate Not Bound To Order FIR In Every Case Under Section 175(3) BNSS If Complainant Possesses All Evidence: Allahabad High Court High Court Can Initiate Suo Motu Inquiry Against Judicial Officers Based On Information; Sworn Affidavit Not Mandatory: Gujarat High Court Lack Of Videography, Independent Witnesses During Contraband Seizure Relevant Factors For Granting Bail Under NDPS Act: Delhi High Court

Discriminatory Denial of Promotion Contrary to Article 14: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's order, ruling that the denial of an 'Out of Turn Promotion' to Harinder Singh was discriminatory and contrary to Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

"Discriminatory denial of promotion, despite parity in service merits with Constable Joginder Singh, observed as violative of Article 14 of the Constitution," observed the High Court in its judgement.

Harinder Singh, a policeman with commendable service, sought an 'Out of Turn Promotion' after his colleague, Constable Joginder Singh, was promoted for similar achievements. A pending criminal case had initially hampered Singh's chances, but it was later quashed by the High Court. Despite this, he was only awarded an 'Asadharan Karya Puraskar' instead of the promotion he sought.

The Central Administrative Tribunal had initially ruled in favor of Singh, stating that the denial was discriminatory. "No adverse inference could be drawn against the petitioner to deny 'Out of Turn Promotion'. The quashing of proceedings acknowledged as rendering a person acquitted for all intents and purposes, negating adverse implications on promotion eligibility," stated the Tribunal.

The High Court affirmed the Tribunal's decision, stressing that competent authorities must act "reasonably, fairly, and in public interest" when considering promotions. The court emphasized that such decisions must withstand the "constitutional guarantee of equality under Article 14."

The High Court's decision sets a precedent that could impact similar cases where 'Out of Turn Promotions' have been denied due to pending or quashed criminal cases. It reaffirms the judiciary's role in upholding constitutional guarantees against discrimination.

The court also directed that the 'Out of Turn Promotion' for Harinder Singh should date back to when the proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. were filed, dismissing writ petitions from both Singh and the Commissioner of Police & Ors.

Date of Decision: 31.10.2023

COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS. VS HARINDER SINGH        

Latest Legal News