Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Convenience of Female Litigants Given Priority: High Court Orders Transfer of Matrimonial Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant decision emphasizing the convenience of female litigants in matrimonial disputes, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh has ordered the transfer of a case filed under Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act. The case, initially pending before the Family Court, Bathinda, will now be moved to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Dabwali, District Sirsa.

Justice Arvind Singh Sangwan, in his decision dated 13th October 2023, observed that the Court should "give more weightage and consideration to the convenience of female litigants" and that transfer of legal proceedings should be allowed, taking into account their convenience. The Court further emphasized that female litigants should not be put under "undue hardships." [Para 2-3]

The petitioner, Sukhvir Kaur, sought the transfer of the case, highlighting the difficulty in prosecuting the petition filed by the respondent due to the distance between Dabwali and Bathinda. The petitioner also pointed out that she has a minor son in her care and custody.

The Court, while allowing the transfer, laid down several conditions. The judgment stated that "the Family Court, Dabwali, District Sirsa will make all the endeavour to refer the case before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre for exploring the possibility of amicable settlement between the parties."

The decision also referred to previous judgments, including Sumita Singh Vs. Kumar Sanjay and Rajani Kishor Pardeshi Vs. Kishor Babulal Pardeshi, which underscored the importance of considering the convenience of female litigants in matrimonial matters.

This judgment is seen as a step towards ensuring justice and fairness by taking into consideration the practical difficulties faced by female litigants in pursuing legal proceedings.

Date of Decision: 13th October 2023

Sukhvir Kaur VS Harjit Singh

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/13Oct2023-Sukhvir_Kaur_vs_Harjit_Singh.pdf"]

Latest Legal News