CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Convenience of Female Litigants Given Priority: High Court Orders Transfer of Matrimonial Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant decision emphasizing the convenience of female litigants in matrimonial disputes, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh has ordered the transfer of a case filed under Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act. The case, initially pending before the Family Court, Bathinda, will now be moved to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Dabwali, District Sirsa.

Justice Arvind Singh Sangwan, in his decision dated 13th October 2023, observed that the Court should "give more weightage and consideration to the convenience of female litigants" and that transfer of legal proceedings should be allowed, taking into account their convenience. The Court further emphasized that female litigants should not be put under "undue hardships." [Para 2-3]

The petitioner, Sukhvir Kaur, sought the transfer of the case, highlighting the difficulty in prosecuting the petition filed by the respondent due to the distance between Dabwali and Bathinda. The petitioner also pointed out that she has a minor son in her care and custody.

The Court, while allowing the transfer, laid down several conditions. The judgment stated that "the Family Court, Dabwali, District Sirsa will make all the endeavour to refer the case before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre for exploring the possibility of amicable settlement between the parties."

The decision also referred to previous judgments, including Sumita Singh Vs. Kumar Sanjay and Rajani Kishor Pardeshi Vs. Kishor Babulal Pardeshi, which underscored the importance of considering the convenience of female litigants in matrimonial matters.

This judgment is seen as a step towards ensuring justice and fairness by taking into consideration the practical difficulties faced by female litigants in pursuing legal proceedings.

Date of Decision: 13th October 2023

Sukhvir Kaur VS Harjit Singh

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/13Oct2023-Sukhvir_Kaur_vs_Harjit_Singh.pdf"]

Latest Legal News