Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |     Disproportionate Fine Cannot Be Imposed for Recovery of 1 Liter of Country-made Liquor: Patna High Court    |     Prosecution failed to prove identity of remains and establish murder beyond reasonable doubt: Orissa High Court Acquit Ex-Husband    |     Despite 12 Injuries on the Victim, No Intention to Kill Found: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC    |    

Bombay High Court Condemns Customs Authorities for Unjust Detention of Goods and Misapplication of Regulations

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a scathing judgment, the Bombay High Court, comprising Hon'ble Justices JITENDRA JAIN and G. S. KULKARNI, has strongly criticized customs authorities for their unjustified detention of goods and the misapplication of regulations. The case centered around the release of consignments of "Lithium Ion Cells" and the dispute over compliance with Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) marking and labeling requirements.

Justices JITENDRA JAIN observed, "There is no justification whatsoever on the part of the respondents in not permitting the release of the consignments in question. In fact, we are quite surprised by the stand taken by the department and that too on complete misapplication of the provisions of the 2018 Regulations, as also the Circulars in question."

The judgment further highlighted the high-handed approach of customs officers, stating, "Such an approach, as adopted by the concerned officers of the customs, is, in fact, high-handed, unknown to the law, and counterproductive to the green initiatives of the Government of India, to promote electric vehicles."

The case also involved the issuance of a show cause notice to the petitioner under Section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962. While the show cause notice was challenged in the proceedings, the Court emphasized that it should proceed independently and be decided expeditiously within two months.

Bombay High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, partly allowing the petition. The judgment not only highlights the need for customs authorities to adhere to regulations but also serves as a reminder of the importance of a fair and lawful approach in such matters.

Date of Decision: 02 November 2023

Chetak Technology Ltd. VS Union of India

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Bom-02-Nov-2023-Chetan-Technologies-Vs-UOI.pdf"]

Similar News