Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court Limitation | 1,142 Days of Silence: Orissa High Court Rejects Litigant's Claim That His Lawyer Never Called SC/ST Act's Bar on Anticipatory Bail Does Not Apply When Complaint Fails to Make Out Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Oral Agreement for Sale Cannot Be Dismissed for Want of Stamp or Registration: Calcutta High Court Upholds Injunction Finance Company's Own Legal Manager Cannot Appoint Arbitrator — Award Passed by Such Arbitrator Is Non-Est and Inexecutable: Andhra Pradesh High Court District Court Cannot Remand Charity Commissioner's Order: Bombay High Court Division Bench Settles Conflicting Views Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court Contributory Negligence | No Driving Licence and Three on a Motorcycle Cannot Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Rajasthan High Court LL.B Degree Cannot Be Ground to Deny Maintenance to Divorced Wife: Gujarat High Court Dried Leaves and Branches Are Not 'Ganja': Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under NDPS Act Family Court Judge Secretly Compared Handwriting Without Telling Wife, Then Punished Her Hesitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Divorce Decree Co-Owner Can Sell Undivided Share in Joint Property Without Consent of Other Co-owners — Sale Deed Valid to Extent of Transferor's Share: Orissa High Court Mandatory Safeguards of Section 42 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed — Even When 1329 Kg of Hashish Is Seized: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal GST Officer Froze Business Accounts Without Any Legal Basis, Ignored Taxpayer for Three Months: Bombay High Court Imposes Personal Costs Weapon Recovered, But No Forensic Report, No Independent Witness — Allahabad High Court Acquits Murder Accused

Bombay High Court Condemns Customs Authorities for Unjust Detention of Goods and Misapplication of Regulations

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a scathing judgment, the Bombay High Court, comprising Hon'ble Justices JITENDRA JAIN and G. S. KULKARNI, has strongly criticized customs authorities for their unjustified detention of goods and the misapplication of regulations. The case centered around the release of consignments of "Lithium Ion Cells" and the dispute over compliance with Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) marking and labeling requirements.

Justices JITENDRA JAIN observed, "There is no justification whatsoever on the part of the respondents in not permitting the release of the consignments in question. In fact, we are quite surprised by the stand taken by the department and that too on complete misapplication of the provisions of the 2018 Regulations, as also the Circulars in question."

The judgment further highlighted the high-handed approach of customs officers, stating, "Such an approach, as adopted by the concerned officers of the customs, is, in fact, high-handed, unknown to the law, and counterproductive to the green initiatives of the Government of India, to promote electric vehicles."

The case also involved the issuance of a show cause notice to the petitioner under Section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962. While the show cause notice was challenged in the proceedings, the Court emphasized that it should proceed independently and be decided expeditiously within two months.

Bombay High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, partly allowing the petition. The judgment not only highlights the need for customs authorities to adhere to regulations but also serves as a reminder of the importance of a fair and lawful approach in such matters.

Date of Decision: 02 November 2023

Chetak Technology Ltd. VS Union of India

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Bom-02-Nov-2023-Chetan-Technologies-Vs-UOI.pdf"]

Latest Legal News