CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

A Step Towards Ensuring Equality and Social Justice – Delhi High Court Upholds Age Relaxation for Contractual Employees

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a pivotal judgement, the Delhi High Court affirmed the age relaxation provision for contractual employees in Delhi Government recruitment processes. The verdict comes as a relief for numerous contractual employees aspiring for permanent positions in government departments.

Delhi High Court observed, "This initiative is a step towards ensuring equality and social justice for contractual employees," thus, acknowledging the necessity and the positive impact of such relaxations.

The appeal highlighted the disparity and the need for equal opportunities for contractual staff in comparison to the regular employees. The appellant pointed out the significant role that contractual employees play in the functioning of government departments and the lack of job security they face.

Delhi High court's order noted, "Contractual employees have been rendering their services for a long period, and it's imperative to provide them with a fair chance in permanent recruitment processes." [Para 7]

Additionally, the court underscored the importance of maintaining a balanced approach to address the concerns of both contractual and regular employees while ensuring the efficiency and functionality of government departments.

The verdict has been lauded as a progressive step towards establishing a more equitable recruitment framework in government sectors, affirming the rights and contributions of contractual employees. The court's observation has set a precedent, emphasizing the essence of equality and social justice in employment practices.

This judgement has potentially paved the way for more inclusive recruitment policies, ensuring a fair chance for all aspirants regardless of their employment status.

Date of Decision: 02 November 2023

SURENDER KUMAR AND OTHERS VS  GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Del-02-Nov-2023-Surender-Kumar-Vs-NCT.pdf"]

Latest Legal News