Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |     Disproportionate Fine Cannot Be Imposed for Recovery of 1 Liter of Country-made Liquor: Patna High Court    |     Prosecution failed to prove identity of remains and establish murder beyond reasonable doubt: Orissa High Court Acquit Ex-Husband    |     Despite 12 Injuries on the Victim, No Intention to Kill Found: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC    |    

A Step Towards Ensuring Equality and Social Justice – Delhi High Court Upholds Age Relaxation for Contractual Employees

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a pivotal judgement, the Delhi High Court affirmed the age relaxation provision for contractual employees in Delhi Government recruitment processes. The verdict comes as a relief for numerous contractual employees aspiring for permanent positions in government departments.

Delhi High Court observed, "This initiative is a step towards ensuring equality and social justice for contractual employees," thus, acknowledging the necessity and the positive impact of such relaxations.

The appeal highlighted the disparity and the need for equal opportunities for contractual staff in comparison to the regular employees. The appellant pointed out the significant role that contractual employees play in the functioning of government departments and the lack of job security they face.

Delhi High court's order noted, "Contractual employees have been rendering their services for a long period, and it's imperative to provide them with a fair chance in permanent recruitment processes." [Para 7]

Additionally, the court underscored the importance of maintaining a balanced approach to address the concerns of both contractual and regular employees while ensuring the efficiency and functionality of government departments.

The verdict has been lauded as a progressive step towards establishing a more equitable recruitment framework in government sectors, affirming the rights and contributions of contractual employees. The court's observation has set a precedent, emphasizing the essence of equality and social justice in employment practices.

This judgement has potentially paved the way for more inclusive recruitment policies, ensuring a fair chance for all aspirants regardless of their employment status.

Date of Decision: 02 November 2023

SURENDER KUMAR AND OTHERS VS  GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Del-02-Nov-2023-Surender-Kumar-Vs-NCT.pdf"]

Similar News