TIP Essential When Identity Based On Belated 'Alias' Claims; Conviction Can't Rest On Improved Witness Testimonies: Supreme Court Conviction Based On Flawed Identification Cannot Be Sustained In Law: Supreme Court Acquits Sri Lankan National In UAPA Case Penalty For Misdeclaration Of Power Capacity Is Strict Liability; No Need To Prove Intent Or 'Gaming': Supreme Court Authority To Appoint Includes Power To Dismiss; Visitor Can Terminate 'First Registrar' Under Transitional Provisions: Supreme Court State Cannot Use Delay Or Contractual Clauses To Deny Statutory Compensation For Land Acquisition: Supreme Court State As Model Employer Cannot Deny Regularization Benefits To Workers Due To Its Own Clerical Lapses: Supreme Court Section 106 Evidence Act | Husband’s Failure To Explain Wife’s Unnatural Death In Matrimonial Home Completes Chain Of Circumstances: Supreme Court Tender Condition For Out-Of-State Bidders To Submit EMD Via Demand Draft Not Mandatory If Clause Uses 'May': Supreme Court Affidavit Is Not 'Evidence' Under Section 3 Of Evidence Act Unless Court Orders Its Use Under Order XIX CPC: Supreme Court Exclusion Of Natural Heirs Not A 'Suspicious Circumstance' To Invalidate Will If Testator Provides Reason: Supreme Court 18-Year-Old Rendered 100% Disabled Entitled To Compensation For Loss Of Marriage Prospects And Dignity: Punjab & Haryana HC Right To Life Under Article 21 Prioritizes Preservation Of Mother's Life Over Reproductive Autonomy If Termination Poses Fatal Risk: J&K High Court Director’s Involvement In Company Affairs A Disputed Fact; High Court Cannot Conduct ‘Mini-Trial’ To Quash Section 138 NI Act Complaint: Punjab & Haryana HC Abuse Of Process: Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs Against Lawyer & Ex-Police Chief Sanjay Pandey; Says Complaints Motivated By Vengeance Magistrate Not Bound To Order FIR In Every Case Under Section 175(3) BNSS If Complainant Possesses All Evidence: Allahabad High Court High Court Can Initiate Suo Motu Inquiry Against Judicial Officers Based On Information; Sworn Affidavit Not Mandatory: Gujarat High Court Lack Of Videography, Independent Witnesses During Contraband Seizure Relevant Factors For Granting Bail Under NDPS Act: Delhi High Court

A Step Towards Ensuring Equality and Social Justice – Delhi High Court Upholds Age Relaxation for Contractual Employees

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a pivotal judgement, the Delhi High Court affirmed the age relaxation provision for contractual employees in Delhi Government recruitment processes. The verdict comes as a relief for numerous contractual employees aspiring for permanent positions in government departments.

Delhi High Court observed, "This initiative is a step towards ensuring equality and social justice for contractual employees," thus, acknowledging the necessity and the positive impact of such relaxations.

The appeal highlighted the disparity and the need for equal opportunities for contractual staff in comparison to the regular employees. The appellant pointed out the significant role that contractual employees play in the functioning of government departments and the lack of job security they face.

Delhi High court's order noted, "Contractual employees have been rendering their services for a long period, and it's imperative to provide them with a fair chance in permanent recruitment processes." [Para 7]

Additionally, the court underscored the importance of maintaining a balanced approach to address the concerns of both contractual and regular employees while ensuring the efficiency and functionality of government departments.

The verdict has been lauded as a progressive step towards establishing a more equitable recruitment framework in government sectors, affirming the rights and contributions of contractual employees. The court's observation has set a precedent, emphasizing the essence of equality and social justice in employment practices.

This judgement has potentially paved the way for more inclusive recruitment policies, ensuring a fair chance for all aspirants regardless of their employment status.

Date of Decision: 02 November 2023

SURENDER KUMAR AND OTHERS VS  GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Del-02-Nov-2023-Surender-Kumar-Vs-NCT.pdf"]

Latest Legal News