(1)
MASSIMILANO LATORRE AND OTHERS .....Appellants Vs.
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....Respondents D.D
15/06/2021
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Penal Law – Firing on Fishermen – Compensation and Quashing of FIR – An unfortunate incident occurred on 15.02.2012, where two Indian fishermen were killed after being fired upon by two Italian Military Naval officials from a passing ship. Following the award of the Arbitral Tribunal under UNCLOS, the Republic of Italy agreed to pay Rs. 10 crores as compensation. The Supreme Cour...
(2)
JIGYA YADAV (MINOR) THROUGH GUARDIAN/FATHER HARI SINGH .....Appellant Vs.
C.B.S.E. (CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION) AND OTHERS .....Respondents D.D
03/06/2021
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Education Law – Correction/Change in CBSE Certificates – The Supreme Court examined the constitutional and statutory validity of the CBSE Examination Byelaws, 2007, in relation to requests for correction or change in the certificates issued by CBSE. The Court observed that the Byelaws, which impose limitations on corrections to be consistent with school records, cannot override an indi...
(3)
ABHISHEK KUMAR SINGH .....Appellant Vs.
G. PATTANAIK AND OTHERS .....Respondents D.D
03/06/2021
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Contempt of Court – Willful Disobedience – The Supreme Court emphasized that contempt action should proceed only for established willful disobedience of the Court's orders. The term "willful" requires intentional, conscious, and deliberate action with full knowledge of the consequences. It excludes casual, accidental, bona fide, or unintentional acts or genuine inability ...
(4)
IN RE: DISTRIBUTION OF ESSENTIAL SUPPLIES AND SERVICES DURING PANDEMIC .....Appellant Vs.
THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT .....Respondent D.D
31/05/2021
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
COVID-19 Vaccination Data – Submission Requirement – The Supreme Court directed the Central Government to provide complete data on the purchase history of COVID-19 vaccines within two weeks, detailing the vaccination progress and the steps to ensure drug availability for mucormycosis treatment. The Court highlighted the need for transparency in government procurement and distribution p...
(5)
THE STATE OF ODISHA AND OTHERS .....Appellants Vs.
ORISSA PRIVATE ENGINEERING COLLEGE ASSOCIATION (OPECA) AND ANOTHER .....Respondents D.D
29/05/2021
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Admissions – B.Tech Courses – COVID-19 Pandemic – The Supreme Court addressed an appeal challenging the High Court's decision to permit admissions to B.Tech courses based on qualifying exam marks due to the pandemic. The Court held that this decision was contrary to Section 3(1) of the Odisha Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fees)...
(6)
GURMEET SINGH .....Appellant Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB .....Respondent D.D
28/05/2021
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dowry Death and Cruelty – Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC – The Supreme Court held that offences under Sections 498-A and 304-B IPC are distinct, though both involve cruelty. Conviction under each section requires separate proof of their specific ingredients. In this case, the death due to poisoning within seven years of marriage and evidence of consistent dowry demands and harassment sat...
(7)
SATBIR SINGH AND ANOTHER .....Appellant Vs.
STATE OF HARYANA .....Respondent D.D
28/05/2021
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dowry Death – Section 304-B IPC – The deceased committed suicide by setting herself ablaze just after one year of her marriage, having been subjected to cruelty and harassment for dowry by the accused. The court emphasized that Section 304-B IPC, which defines 'dowry death', should be interpreted keeping in mind the legislative intent to curb the social evil of dowry demands an...
(8)
NATHU SINGH.....Appellant Vs.
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS .....Respondent D.D
28/05/2021
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Procedure Code – Anticipatory Bail – The High Court's rejection of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. does not preclude it from granting protection from arrest in exceptional circumstances. However, such protection must be narrowly tailored and justified with reasons, and for the shortest duration necessary. The High Court's grant of 90 days protection without...
(9)
SUNIL KUMAR @ SUDHIR KUMAR AND ANOTHER .....Appellant Vs.
RESPONDENT: THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH .....Respondent D.D
25/05/2021
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Multiple Punishments – Concurrent or Consecutive Sentences – It is legally obligatory upon the Court of first instance to specify in clear terms whether the sentences would run concurrently or consecutively when awarding multiple punishments of imprisonment. Section 31(1) CrPC vests complete discretion with the Court to order the sentences for two or more offences at one trial to run c...