(1)
ANITA RANI .....Appellant Vs.
ASHOK KUMAR AND OTHERS .....Respondent D.D
16/12/2021
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Burden of Proof – Full and Final Settlement – Defendants admitted receipt of Rs. 1,050,000/- and partial repayment of Rs. 500,000/-, claimed it as full and final settlement – No written proof of settlement – Oral evidence of mediators insufficient without documentary evidence – Defendants failed to prove the onus of settlement – Plaintiff entitled to recovery de...
(2)
MAJJI SANNEMMA @ SANYASIRAO .....Appellant Vs.
REDDY SRIDEVI AND OTHERS .....Respondent D.D
16/12/2021
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Condonation of Delay – Appeal against Order – Respondent's delay of 1011 days in preferring the Second Appeal condoned by the High Court – No sufficient or satisfactory explanation provided for the delay – Courts cannot entertain belated and stale claims on equity grounds – Delay defeats equity – The High Court failed to exercise discretion judiciously &ndas...
(3)
JAIKAM KHAN .....Appellant Vs.
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH .....Respondent D.D
15/12/2021
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Law – Murder Conviction – Prosecution's burden to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt – Conviction based on interested and related witnesses' testimony – Court found inconsistencies in the prosecution's case, including discrepancies in witness statements, the manner of arrests, and lack of independent corroboration – High Court erred in confirmi...
(4)
THE BIJNOR URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED BIJNOR AND OTHERS .....Appellant Vs.
MEENAL AGARWAL AND OTHERS .....Respondent D.D
15/12/2021
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
One Time Settlement (OTS) Scheme – Non-Performing Asset (NPA) – Bank initiated proceedings under SARFAESI Act – Respondent's loan account categorized as NPA – Respondent applied for OTS which was rejected by the bank due to eligibility criteria – High Court issued a writ of mandamus directing bank to consider the application positively – Supreme Court held t...
(5)
JHARKHAND URJA VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED .....Appellant Vs.
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS .....Respondent D.D
15/12/2021
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Arbitration Award – Setting Aside of Arbitral Award – Order passed by Facilitation Council without following arbitration procedure – Council’s order was challenged in writ petition – High Court dismissed the petition – Supreme Court held that the order of the Facilitation Council was a nullity as it bypassed mandatory arbitration procedure under MSMED Act and Ar...
(6)
UTTAR PRADESH SUBORDINATE SERVICE SELECTION COMMISSION AND ANOTHER .....Appellant Vs.
BRIJENDRA PRATAP SINGH AND ANOTHER .....Respondent D.D
14/12/2021
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Examination Question – Validity – Question regarding the Panchayati Raj Minister in Uttar Pradesh at the time of the exam was ambiguous due to the minister's recent death – Commission decided to award marks to candidates who chose the correct answer as per the pre-death scenario or left it unanswered – Respondent who chose an incorrect option sought relief – Supre...
(7)
APMC YASHWANTHAPURA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY .....Appellant Vs.
M/S. SELVA FOODS THROUGH ITS MANAGING PARTNER .....Respondent D.D
14/12/2021
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Market Fee – Liability on Imported Produce – Respondent, engaged in selling processed spices, imports agricultural produce from outside Karnataka, processes it, and sells within the appellant's market area – Market fee levied under Section 65(2) of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act of 1966 – Exemption not applicable to imports...
(8)
DIAMOND EXPORTS AND ANOTHER .....Appellant Vs.
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND OTHER .....Respondent D.D
14/12/2021
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Consumer Complaint – Limitation Period – NCDRC condoned a delay of 100 days in filing a written statement – Appeal based on Constitution Bench judgment in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Hilli Multipurpose Cold Storage (2020) 5 SCC 757, which restricts the extension of time beyond 45 days – Judgment applied prospectively – Orders of NCDRC allowing condonation on merit...
(9)
STATE OF HARYANA .....Appellant Vs.
M/S. SHIV SHANKAR CONSTRUCTION CO. AND ANOTHER .....Respondent D.D
14/12/2021
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Arbitral Award – Excess of Claim – Contractor initially claimed Rs. 10,350,263 but was awarded Rs. 15,195,400 by the Arbitrator – Award in excess of claim is invalid and amounts to jurisdictional overreach – Supreme Court upholds award only up to claimed amount [Paras 9.1-9.2].
Scope of Reference – Maintenance Contract – Arbitrator awarded amounts beyond the ...