(1)
ASSISTANT ENGINEER, RAJASTHAN STATE AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD SUB-DIVISION KOTA
.....Appellant Vs.
MOHAN LAL
.....Respondent D.D
16/08/2013
Industrial Disputes – Relief for Illegal Termination – Workman terminated without notice or compensation – Labour Court directed reinstatement with 30% back wages – High Court substituted reinstatement with compensation due to delay in raising dispute – Supreme Court found reinstatement inappropriate due to six-year delay in dispute – Compensation ordered instead of reinstatement [Para...
(2)
VIKAS
.....Appellant Vs.
STATE OF RAJASTHAN
.....Respondent D.D
16/08/2013
Criminal Law – Issuance of Warrants – Appellant's challenge to non-bailable warrants issued under Section 319 CrPC – Trial Court issued non-bailable warrants based on evidence implicating the appellant in serious offences – High Court confirmed the Trial Court’s decision – Supreme Court modified the order to issue summons instead, emphasizing the importance of securing attendance ...
(3)
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI IV
.....Appellant Vs.
CIENS LABORATORIES, MUMBAI
.....Respondent
APPELLANT:
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, THANE-II
.....Appellant
VERSUS
TIME PHARMA, MUMBAI
.....Respondent D.D
14/08/2013
Excise Duty – Classification of Goods – Product 'Moisturex' classified as medicament under Heading 30.03 – Contains pharmaceutical constituents with therapeutic properties – Intended for treatment of dry skin conditions, not just for skin care – Tribunal’s classification upheld [Paras 1-21].Medicaments vs. Cosmetics – Medicaments contain therapeutic or prophylactic ingredie...
(4)
STATE OF JHARKHAND AND OTHERS
.....Appellant Vs.
JITENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA AND ANOTHER
.....Respondent D.D
14/08/2013
Pension – Withholding during Pendency of Proceedings – Appellant State withheld part of pension and gratuity during the pendency of criminal and departmental proceedings – Respondent challenged this action – High Court held that there is no power under the Bihar Pension Rules to withhold pension/gratuity during the pendency of proceedings – Supreme Court upheld High Court's decision...
(5)
LALU PRASAD @ LALU PRASAD YADAV
.....Appellant Vs.
STATE OF JHARKHAND
.....Respondent D.D
13/08/2013
Criminal Law – Transfer of Case – Appellant sought transfer of case alleging bias and unfair trial – Arguments by prosecution concluded, defense arguments near completion – Special Judge directed submission of written arguments and set judgment date – Supreme Court provided further time for arguments and upheld the High Court’s dismissal of the transfer petition [Paras 2-14].Judicial B...
(6)
PRABHUDAS DAMODAR KOTECHA AND OTHERS
.....Appellant Vs.
MANHABALA JERAM DAMODAR AND ANOTHER
.....Respondent D.D
13/08/2013
Jurisdiction – Small Causes Court – Suit by licensor against gratuitous licensee for recovery of possession – Division Bench of Bombay High Court held such suits are not tenable before the Presidency Small Causes Court – Full Bench overruled this decision, stating the term "licensee" in Section 41(1) of the PSCC Act includes gratuitous licensees – Supreme Court affirmed Full Be...
(7)
ALAKNANDA HYDRO POWER COMPANY LTD.
.....Appellant Vs.
ANUJ JOSHI AND OTHERS
.....Respondent D.D
13/08/2013
Environmental Law – Public Hearing Requirement – SHEP received environmental clearance in 1985, before the enactment of the EIA Notification, 1994 – Supreme Court held that public hearing was not required as the project was an ongoing one nearing completion – Public hearing considered unnecessary at advanced construction stage [Paras 8-18].Relocation of Religious Structures – Dhari Devi ...
(8)
STATE OF M.P.
.....Appellant Vs.
BABULAL AND OTHERS
.....Respondent D.D
12/08/2013
Criminal Law – Sentencing – High Court reduced the sentence of respondents from two years to three months due to the protracted nature of proceedings – Supreme Court emphasized the importance of proportional sentencing – Held that the reduction was unjustified and restored the trial court's sentence [Paras 1-20].Proportionality in Sentencing – Courts must balance the gravity of the ...
(9)
DEEPALI GUNDU SURWASE
.....Appellant Vs.
KRANTI JUNIOR ADHYAPAK MAHAVIDYALAYA (D. ED.) AND OTHERS
.....Respondent D.D
12/08/2013
Service Law – Reinstatement – Back Wages – Employer's onus to prove gainful employment – Denial of back wages to an employee who has suffered due to illegal act of employer amounts to rewarding the employer and punishing the employee. The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal's decision for reinstatement with full back wages, as the management failed to prove the employee's gain...