Revenue Authority Cannot Vest Land In State Under Section 79A, Suo Motu Proceedings After 11 Years Fatal: Gujarat High Court Campaigning During 48-Hour Silent Period Is Not 'Undue Influence' Under Section 123(2), Election Petition Must Plead How Result Was Materially Affected: Bombay High Court DVDs Carrying Encoded Data Infringe Patent Even If Stampers Are Outsourced: Delhi High Court in Philips’ DVD-ROM Patent Dispute Departmental Exoneration Does Not Bar Criminal Trial If Key Evidence Not Considered: Karnataka HC Refuses To Quash PSI’s Corruption Case Can't Claim Irrevocable License Under Section 60 Easements Act Without Pleading It First: Punjab & Haryana High Court Ex Parte Decree Obtained Behind Back of True Owner Confers No Title; Appellate Stage Cannot Be Used to Rescue a Fundamentally Flawed Claim: Supreme Court Order XLI Rule 27 CPC | Appeal Cannot Be Decided Without First Adjudicating Additional Evidence Application: Supreme Court Section 498A IPC | Only Allegation Quarrelling Is Not a Criminal Offence, Cannot Sustain Cognizance: Supreme Court Quash Proceedings Eye-Witness Survives 82 Pages of Cross-Examination: Allahabad High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Payment of Tax Receipts Is Not A Conclusive Proof of Possession of Property: Andhra Pradesh High Court Spa Owner Who Personally Received Marked Currency And Promised 'Nice Females With Closed Door Rooms' Cannot Escape Trafficking Charges: Bombay High Court No Person Can Transfer A Better Title Than What He Possesses In Property So Transferred: Andhra Pradesh High Court Unsubstantiated Allegations of Illicit Affair and Attempt to Kill Child in Written Statement Amount to Mental Cruelty: Calcutta High Court Grants Divorce Child Dies Inside Anganwadi Centre After Repeated Complaints About Exposed Wires Went Unaddressed: Chhattisgarh High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognisance, Directs Statewide Safety Audit 'High Speed' Without Mentioning Approximate Speed Not Sufficient To Prove Rash And Negligent Driving Under Section 279 IPC: Himachal Pradesh High Court 'Reverse Passing Off' Is Not an Actionable Tort in Indian Trade Mark Law: Delhi High Court: SARFAESI E-Auction Purchaser Cannot Be Prosecuted For Undervaluation When DRT Has Affirmed Valuation: Jharkhand High Court Republishing Defamatory Facebook Post On Website Constitutes Fresh Offence of Defamation; Prior Publication In Public Domain No Defence: Kerala High Court One Year Custody Not Prolonged In Cases Involving Attack On Police Post With Explosive Substance: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail Bribe Demand Can Be Proved Through Electronic Evidence Even If Complainant Turns Hostile: Rajasthan High Court Sand Theft Under BNS And Kerala Sand Act Can Be Prosecuted Simultaneously; Earlier Contrary View Per Incuriam: Kerala High Court Judge Overrules Own Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds Substantial Progress in Curbing Objectionable Videos of Sexual Violence

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, August 1, 2023: In a landmark ruling today, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath, upheld the substantial progress made in preventing the circulation of objectionable videos related to child pornography, gang-rape, rape, and other forms of sexual violence on various digital platforms. The court concluded Suo Moto Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 3 of 2015, addressing the issue of online content showcasing heinous crimes.

The Suo Moto Writ Petition was initiated in response to the Prajwala letter dated 18.2.2015, which brought to light the presence of objectionable videos of sexual violence on wide-reaching platforms. Over the years, the court passed multiple orders and appointed a Committee of Experts to deliberate on possible solutions.

"The issue revolves around objectionable videos pertaining to child pornography, gang-rape, rape, etc. which are published on various wide-reaching platforms," read the Court's order. It further highlighted that "substantial issues have been resolved" while acknowledging the efforts of the Committee, Amicus Curiae, and representatives of intermediaries involved in the process.

The Court expressed its satisfaction with the progress made in preventing the publicity of such disturbing content and emphasized that it is not an adversarial litigation. The Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, played a crucial role in curbing the dissemination of these videos.

"While certain non-consensus issues remained unresolved, larger issues witnessed consensus," stated the court. It also assured parties aggrieved by non-compliance of relevant provisions that they could approach the Union of India for resolution or seek relief from the court if required.

The judgment received widespread praise for its efforts in safeguarding digital spaces and protecting vulnerable individuals from exploitation. Various legal experts and social activists have commended the Court's proactive approach in addressing the urgent matter of online content showcasing sexual violence.

The Suo Moto Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 3 of 2015 marks a significant milestone in the ongoing battle against digital crimes and child exploitation, reaffirming India's commitment to creating a safer online environment for all its citizens.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/01-aug-2023-.pdf"]

Latest Legal News