Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Supreme Court Upholds Substantial Progress in Curbing Objectionable Videos of Sexual Violence

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, August 1, 2023: In a landmark ruling today, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath, upheld the substantial progress made in preventing the circulation of objectionable videos related to child pornography, gang-rape, rape, and other forms of sexual violence on various digital platforms. The court concluded Suo Moto Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 3 of 2015, addressing the issue of online content showcasing heinous crimes.

The Suo Moto Writ Petition was initiated in response to the Prajwala letter dated 18.2.2015, which brought to light the presence of objectionable videos of sexual violence on wide-reaching platforms. Over the years, the court passed multiple orders and appointed a Committee of Experts to deliberate on possible solutions.

"The issue revolves around objectionable videos pertaining to child pornography, gang-rape, rape, etc. which are published on various wide-reaching platforms," read the Court's order. It further highlighted that "substantial issues have been resolved" while acknowledging the efforts of the Committee, Amicus Curiae, and representatives of intermediaries involved in the process.

The Court expressed its satisfaction with the progress made in preventing the publicity of such disturbing content and emphasized that it is not an adversarial litigation. The Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, played a crucial role in curbing the dissemination of these videos.

"While certain non-consensus issues remained unresolved, larger issues witnessed consensus," stated the court. It also assured parties aggrieved by non-compliance of relevant provisions that they could approach the Union of India for resolution or seek relief from the court if required.

The judgment received widespread praise for its efforts in safeguarding digital spaces and protecting vulnerable individuals from exploitation. Various legal experts and social activists have commended the Court's proactive approach in addressing the urgent matter of online content showcasing sexual violence.

The Suo Moto Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 3 of 2015 marks a significant milestone in the ongoing battle against digital crimes and child exploitation, reaffirming India's commitment to creating a safer online environment for all its citizens.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/01-aug-2023-.pdf"]

Latest Legal News