Section 32 Arbitration Act | Termination for Non-Payment of Fees Ends Arbitrator’s Mandate; Remedy Lies in Section 14(2): Supreme Court False Allegations of Dowry and Bigamy Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madras High Court Upholds Divorce Plaintiff Must Prove Her Own Title Before Seeking Demolition Of Defendant’s Pre-existing House: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mismatch Between Bullet and Recovered Gun Fatal to Prosecution: Calcutta High Court Acquits Man Convicted for Murder Where the Conduct of the Sole Eye-Witness Appears Unnatural and No Independent Witness Is Examined, Conviction Cannot Stand: Allahabad High Court Fraudulent Sale of Vehicle During Hire Purchase Renders Agreement Void: Gauhati High Court Upholds Decree for Refund of ₹4.90 Lakhs Unsigned Written Statement Can’t Silence a Defendant: Hyper-Technical Objections Must Yield to Substantive Justice: Delhi High Court Default Bail | No Accused, No Extension: Delhi High Court Rules Custody Extension Without Notice as Gross Illegality Under Article 21 Gratuity Can Be Withheld Post-Retirement for Proven Negligence Under Service Rules – Payment of Gratuity Act Does Not Override CDA Rules: Calcutta High Court Cognizance Is of the Offence, Not the Offender: Madras High Court Rejects Challenge to ED’s Supplementary Complaint in PMLA Case Acquittal in Rajasthan No Bar to Trial in Madhya Pradesh: MP High Court Rejects Double Jeopardy Plea in Antiquities Theft Case 20% Deposit Isn’t Automatic in Cheque Bounce Appeals: Right to Appeal Can’t Be Priced Out: Punjab & Haryana High Court Checks Mechanical Use of Section 148 NI Act A Child Is Not a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets New Benchmark in Compensation for Minors’ Deaths 90 Days Is Not Sacrosanct – Courts Can Permit Reply to Counter-Claim Even Beyond Prescribed Time in Interest of Justice: Punjab & Haryana High Court Magistrate Can Proceed Only for Offences Committed in India Until Sanction Is Obtained for Acts Outside India: Orissa High Court on International Financial Fraud Award Is Vitiated by Non-Consideration of Material Evidence: Orissa High Court Sets Aside Industrial Tribunal’s Wage Award in IMFA Case POCSO | Absence of Child's Name in Birth Certificate Not Fatal: Kerala High Court No One Has the Right to Impute Illicit Motives to Judges in the Name of Free Speech: Karnataka High Court Jails Man for Criminal Contempt DV Complaint Cannot Be Quashed at Threshold Under Article 227: Madras High Court Refuses to Interfere, Directs Accused to Seek Remedy Before Magistrate Recovery Wasn't From Accused's Exclusive Knowledge — Cylinder Already Marked in Site Plan Before Arrest: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man in Murder Case State Can’t Block SARFAESI Sale by Late Revenue Entries: Secured Creditor’s Charge Prevails Over Tax Dues: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slams Sub-Registrar’s Refusal Providing SIM Card Without Knowledge of Its Criminal Use Does Not Imply Criminal Conspiracy: P&H High Court Grants Bail in UAPA & Murder Case Importer Who Accepts Enhanced Valuation Cannot Later Contest Confiscation and Penalty for Undervaluation: Madras High Court Upholds Strict Liability under Customs Act "Allegations Are Not Proof: Madras High Court Refuses Divorce Without Substantiated Cruelty or Desertion" When FIR Is Filed After Consulting Political Leaders, the Possibility of Coloured Version Cannot Be Ruled Out: Kerala High Court Mere Allegations of Antecedents Without Conviction Can't Defeat Right to Anticipatory Bail: Kerala High Court Section 106 Of Evidence Act Cannot Be Invoked In Vacuum – Prosecution Must First Lay Foundational Facts: Karnataka High Court Acquits Wife And Co-Accused In Husband’s Murder Case Parity Cannot Be Claimed When Roles Are Different: Karnataka High Court Refuses Bail to Youth Accused of Brutal Killing Injured Wife Would Not Falsely Implicate Her Husband: Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction in Domestic Stabbing Case Disputed Bids, Missing Evidence and No Prejudice: Delhi High Court Refuses to Intervene in Tender Challenge under Article 226 Setting Fire to House Where Only Minors Were Present is a Heinous Offence – No Quashing Merely Because Parties Settled: Calcutta High Court No Exclusive Possession Means Licence, Not Lease: Calcutta High Court Rules City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Evict Licensees Defendant's Own Family Attested the Sale Agreement – Yet She Called It Nominal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Specific Performance Renewal Not Automatic, No Evidence Of Notice Or Mutual Agreement: AP High Court Dismisses Indian Oil’s Appeal Against Eviction

Supreme Court Upholds Substantial Progress in Curbing Objectionable Videos of Sexual Violence

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, August 1, 2023: In a landmark ruling today, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath, upheld the substantial progress made in preventing the circulation of objectionable videos related to child pornography, gang-rape, rape, and other forms of sexual violence on various digital platforms. The court concluded Suo Moto Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 3 of 2015, addressing the issue of online content showcasing heinous crimes.

The Suo Moto Writ Petition was initiated in response to the Prajwala letter dated 18.2.2015, which brought to light the presence of objectionable videos of sexual violence on wide-reaching platforms. Over the years, the court passed multiple orders and appointed a Committee of Experts to deliberate on possible solutions.

"The issue revolves around objectionable videos pertaining to child pornography, gang-rape, rape, etc. which are published on various wide-reaching platforms," read the Court's order. It further highlighted that "substantial issues have been resolved" while acknowledging the efforts of the Committee, Amicus Curiae, and representatives of intermediaries involved in the process.

The Court expressed its satisfaction with the progress made in preventing the publicity of such disturbing content and emphasized that it is not an adversarial litigation. The Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, played a crucial role in curbing the dissemination of these videos.

"While certain non-consensus issues remained unresolved, larger issues witnessed consensus," stated the court. It also assured parties aggrieved by non-compliance of relevant provisions that they could approach the Union of India for resolution or seek relief from the court if required.

The judgment received widespread praise for its efforts in safeguarding digital spaces and protecting vulnerable individuals from exploitation. Various legal experts and social activists have commended the Court's proactive approach in addressing the urgent matter of online content showcasing sexual violence.

The Suo Moto Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 3 of 2015 marks a significant milestone in the ongoing battle against digital crimes and child exploitation, reaffirming India's commitment to creating a safer online environment for all its citizens.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/01-aug-2023-.pdf"]

Latest Legal News