CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Supreme Court Halts Immediate Action Against 10-Year Diesel & 15-Year Petrol Vehicles in Delhi-NCR

12 August 2025 9:42 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


Supreme Court Halts Immediate Action Against 10-Year Diesel & 15-Year Petrol Vehicles in Delhi-NCR

Bench Protects Vehicle Owners Pending Review of 2018 Age-Based Ban

The Supreme Court today, August 12, ordered that no coercive action will be taken against owners of 10-year-old diesel and 15-year-old petrol vehicles in Delhi-NCR, granting interim relief in the ongoing MC Mehta environmental litigation.

The bench of CJI BR Gavai, Justice K Vinod Chandran, and Justice NV Anjaria passed the direction while hearing a batch of pleas linked to the controversial age-based ban. The Court also issued notice on the Delhi Government’s review petition against the 2018 ruling that upheld the ban.

Delhi Government Pushes for Stay on Ban – Calls Policy Arbitrary

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Delhi Government, urged the Court to pause enforcement, warning that the existing rule compels police to seize such vehicles immediately. He argued the policy was arbitrary since private vehicle owners face mandatory scrapping, while the same vehicles used commercially can operate beyond the age limit.

Delhi Govt’s Review Petition Seeks Scientific Study on Pollution Impact

The Delhi Government’s plea highlights that since 2018, stricter emission monitoring standards and expanded pollution testing coverage have been implemented. It seeks: A comprehensive scientific assessment by the Union Government and Commission for Air Quality Management on the actual environmental benefit of the ban.

Reevaluation of the policy based on fitness standards rather than arbitrary age limits.

From NGT Orders to Present Courtroom Clash

In 2015, the National Green Tribunal (NGT) banned diesel vehicles over 10 years old and petrol vehicles over 15 years from plying in Delhi-NCR to curb pollution. The Supreme Court in 2018 upheld this directive.
In 2024, the Delhi Government issued End-of-Life Vehicle (ELV) Guidelines, ordering fuel outlets to stop supplying fuel to such vehicles from July 1, 2025 — a move put on hold after public backlash.

Intervention Pleas Seek Clarity on Effective Date & Fitness-Based Criteria

Several intervention applications have also been filed, represented by Advocate Charu Mathur, demanding that:

1. Vehicle fitness — not age — be the main criterion for scrapping.
2. 2024 ELV Guidelines be struck down for lack of statutory backing.
3. The 2018 order be applied prospectively, protecting owners who purchased vehicles before its implementation.

MC Mehta v. Union of India – WP (C) No. 13029 of 1985 & IAs
Next Steps: Court notices issued to all parties; interim relief to continue until further orders.

Latest Legal News