Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Punjab and Haryana High Court Orders CBI Investigation into Alleged Land Compensation Fraud

01 March 2025 3:04 PM

By: sayum


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court ordered a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into an alleged land compensation fraud case, transferring the investigation from the state authorities. The decision, delivered by Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi, underscores the necessity of an unbiased investigation due to allegations of local political interference and compromised inquiry by state officials.

The case revolves around the disputed inheritance and subsequent compensation of land owned by the late Lt. General Sant Singh in Village Dakha, Ludhiana. The petition was filed by Suneet Kaur, the granddaughter of the deceased, challenging the validity of affidavits and actions undertaken by her relatives, including her aunt Amarjeet Kaur and cousins Geetinder Kaur and Sanjeet Kaur. The land in question was acquired by the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) for the Delhi-Katra Express Highway, with compensation deposited in the court due to ongoing litigation over inheritance rights.

The court noted that Amarjeet Kaur, using powers of attorney from her daughters, falsely claimed there was no pending litigation on the property to secure compensation. Despite receiving substantial amounts, her daughters were exonerated based on questionable legal opinions that the power of attorney absolved them of liability.

Justice Bedi highlighted the interference of Ahbaab Singh Grewal, a senior functionary in Punjab, who played a pivotal role in facilitating the fraudulent actions. The court emphasized the failure of the state investigation to address Grewal's involvement and the evident bias in exonerating key individuals based on inadequate legal rationale.

Citing multiple precedents, the court asserted its authority to transfer investigations to CBI even post submission of chargesheets if the local inquiry is compromised. The judgment referenced notable cases like State of West Bengal vs. Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights West Bengal and Rubabbudin Sheikh vs. State of Gujarat, reinforcing the judiciary’s role in ensuring impartial investigations.

Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi remarked, “The active role of respondent No.5 and others in perpetrating the fraud and interfering with the investigation cannot be ruled out. Therefore, in order to ensure a free, fair and unbiased investigation, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is directed to conduct the investigation.”

The High Court’s directive to the CBI reflects a robust stand against compromised state inquiries, ensuring justice in complex fraud cases involving significant political influence. The ruling aims to reinforce the credibility of the judicial process and fair investigation standards. This decision is anticipated to set a precedent for handling similar cases in the future, where local investigations may be susceptible to external influences.

Date of Decision: July 2, 2024

Latest Legal News