Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court Ban Junk Food Within 50 Metres Of Schools: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Moto Cognizance To Enforce FSSAI Norms, Protect Children From Obesity

Punjab and Haryana High Court Orders CBI Investigation into Alleged Land Compensation Fraud

01 March 2025 3:04 PM

By: sayum


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court ordered a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into an alleged land compensation fraud case, transferring the investigation from the state authorities. The decision, delivered by Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi, underscores the necessity of an unbiased investigation due to allegations of local political interference and compromised inquiry by state officials.

The case revolves around the disputed inheritance and subsequent compensation of land owned by the late Lt. General Sant Singh in Village Dakha, Ludhiana. The petition was filed by Suneet Kaur, the granddaughter of the deceased, challenging the validity of affidavits and actions undertaken by her relatives, including her aunt Amarjeet Kaur and cousins Geetinder Kaur and Sanjeet Kaur. The land in question was acquired by the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) for the Delhi-Katra Express Highway, with compensation deposited in the court due to ongoing litigation over inheritance rights.

The court noted that Amarjeet Kaur, using powers of attorney from her daughters, falsely claimed there was no pending litigation on the property to secure compensation. Despite receiving substantial amounts, her daughters were exonerated based on questionable legal opinions that the power of attorney absolved them of liability.

Justice Bedi highlighted the interference of Ahbaab Singh Grewal, a senior functionary in Punjab, who played a pivotal role in facilitating the fraudulent actions. The court emphasized the failure of the state investigation to address Grewal's involvement and the evident bias in exonerating key individuals based on inadequate legal rationale.

Citing multiple precedents, the court asserted its authority to transfer investigations to CBI even post submission of chargesheets if the local inquiry is compromised. The judgment referenced notable cases like State of West Bengal vs. Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights West Bengal and Rubabbudin Sheikh vs. State of Gujarat, reinforcing the judiciary’s role in ensuring impartial investigations.

Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi remarked, “The active role of respondent No.5 and others in perpetrating the fraud and interfering with the investigation cannot be ruled out. Therefore, in order to ensure a free, fair and unbiased investigation, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is directed to conduct the investigation.”

The High Court’s directive to the CBI reflects a robust stand against compromised state inquiries, ensuring justice in complex fraud cases involving significant political influence. The ruling aims to reinforce the credibility of the judicial process and fair investigation standards. This decision is anticipated to set a precedent for handling similar cases in the future, where local investigations may be susceptible to external influences.

Date of Decision: July 2, 2024

Latest Legal News