CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Punjab and Haryana High Court Orders CBI Investigation into Alleged Land Compensation Fraud

01 March 2025 3:04 PM

By: sayum


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court ordered a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into an alleged land compensation fraud case, transferring the investigation from the state authorities. The decision, delivered by Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi, underscores the necessity of an unbiased investigation due to allegations of local political interference and compromised inquiry by state officials.

The case revolves around the disputed inheritance and subsequent compensation of land owned by the late Lt. General Sant Singh in Village Dakha, Ludhiana. The petition was filed by Suneet Kaur, the granddaughter of the deceased, challenging the validity of affidavits and actions undertaken by her relatives, including her aunt Amarjeet Kaur and cousins Geetinder Kaur and Sanjeet Kaur. The land in question was acquired by the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) for the Delhi-Katra Express Highway, with compensation deposited in the court due to ongoing litigation over inheritance rights.

The court noted that Amarjeet Kaur, using powers of attorney from her daughters, falsely claimed there was no pending litigation on the property to secure compensation. Despite receiving substantial amounts, her daughters were exonerated based on questionable legal opinions that the power of attorney absolved them of liability.

Justice Bedi highlighted the interference of Ahbaab Singh Grewal, a senior functionary in Punjab, who played a pivotal role in facilitating the fraudulent actions. The court emphasized the failure of the state investigation to address Grewal's involvement and the evident bias in exonerating key individuals based on inadequate legal rationale.

Citing multiple precedents, the court asserted its authority to transfer investigations to CBI even post submission of chargesheets if the local inquiry is compromised. The judgment referenced notable cases like State of West Bengal vs. Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights West Bengal and Rubabbudin Sheikh vs. State of Gujarat, reinforcing the judiciary’s role in ensuring impartial investigations.

Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi remarked, “The active role of respondent No.5 and others in perpetrating the fraud and interfering with the investigation cannot be ruled out. Therefore, in order to ensure a free, fair and unbiased investigation, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is directed to conduct the investigation.”

The High Court’s directive to the CBI reflects a robust stand against compromised state inquiries, ensuring justice in complex fraud cases involving significant political influence. The ruling aims to reinforce the credibility of the judicial process and fair investigation standards. This decision is anticipated to set a precedent for handling similar cases in the future, where local investigations may be susceptible to external influences.

Date of Decision: July 2, 2024

Latest Legal News