Without Partition By Metes And Bounds, Co-Sharer Cannot Seek Recovery Of Possession: Supreme Court Clarifies Limits Of Order VII Rule 7 CPC Supreme Court Holds Plaintiff Entitled To Declaration Of Title Over Undivided Half Share Despite Claiming Entire Property Under Gift Deed Supreme Court Reaffirms Legality Of Remainder Of Natural Life Sentences Without Remission, Dismisses Batch Of Writ Petitions 'State Cannot Take Advantage Of Its Own Wrong': Supreme Court Holds Promotees Entitled To Count Ad Hoc Service For Seniority If Within Quota 'Elevators Are Common Carriers, Entail Heightened Duty of Care': Supreme Court Upholds NCDRC Order Holding OTIS Principally Liable For Death Due To Malfunctioning Lift Supreme Court Dismisses Compensation Claim Under Motor Vehicles Act, Holds Reach Stacker Operating in Custom-Bonded ICD Area Is Not a "Motor Vehicle" Missing ACRs Due To Illegal Termination Cannot Block Higher Judicial Pay Scales: Supreme Court Grants Relief To Rajasthan Judicial Officer Subsequent Suit Generally Transferable To Court Where Earlier Suit On Same Subject Matter Is Pending: Allahabad High Court Successive Anticipatory Bail Maintainable Under BNSS If Fact Situation Changes Or Previous Findings Become Obsolete: Andhra Pradesh High Court Tenant's "Deemed Purchaser" Right Defeated By Retrospective Notification Under Section 88(1)(b) Of Tenancy Act: Bombay High Court Buyer Not Entitled To Refund Of Earnest Money Once Sale Deed Is Duly Executed Under The Agreement: Calcutta High Court Contradictory Pleas Vitiate Defence; Drawer Liable Even If Signed Blank Cheque Was Handed Over: Delhi High Court Working Mother's Relocation To Another City Not A Ground To Completely Deny Overnight Custody To Father: Karnataka High Court Civil Courts Barred From Granting Injunctions Against SARFAESI Actions Even If Partition Suit Is Maintainable: Kerala High Court S.147 NI Act Is A Special Law, Overrides S.320 CrPC; Offence Can Be Compounded At Any Stage Even After Dismissal Of Appeal: Madras High Court Appellate Court Can Allow Additional Evidence To Ensure Fair Adjudication Even If Not Produced In Trial: Madhya Pradesh High Court Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Upon Suspicion Of 'Proceeds Of Crime': Punjab & Haryana High Court

Non-Payment of Salary or Bonus Does Not Constitute Criminal Offense: Calcutta High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings

12 October 2024 1:11 PM

By: sayum


Calcutta High Court in Dasrathbhai Narsangbhai Chaudhary @ Dasrath Chaudhary & Another v. State of West Bengal (C.R.R. 1395 of 2022) quashed criminal proceedings against two former directors of a company accused of cheating and criminal breach of trust. The Court held that the dispute over unpaid salary and performance bonuses was civil in nature and did not meet the criteria for criminal prosecution under Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 (criminal breach of trust) of the Indian Penal Code.

The case involved a complaint filed by Debasis Majumdar, a former CEO of Safal Life Science (P) Ltd., alleging that the company and its former directors failed to pay him a salary and performance bonus totaling ₹1.47 crore. Majumdar worked for the company from April 2017 to March 2019, and despite repeated requests and legal notices, his dues were not settled. He initiated a criminal complaint, accusing the directors of cheating and breach of trust. The Judicial Magistrate took cognizance of the complaint and issued summons to the accused.

The former directors, Dasrathbhai Narsangbhai Chaudhary and another petitioner, challenged the proceedings in the High Court, arguing that the dispute was purely civil and that they had resigned from the company before the complaint was filed.

The primary legal question was whether the non-payment of salary and bonuses could be classified as cheating or criminal breach of trust under the Indian Penal Code.

The dispute was a civil matter concerning unpaid dues, which should be addressed through a civil suit, not a criminal proceeding.

They were no longer directors of the company at the time of the complaint, having resigned and transferred their shares in 2019.

The trial court failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 202 of the CrPC, as the accused resided outside the territorial jurisdiction of the court.

The Court found merit in these arguments, emphasizing that no fraudulent intent or dishonest inducement was demonstrated at the time of employment. It noted:

"The allegation in the complaint does not spell out any essential ingredient for the commission of offenses under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The disputes between the parties are purely civil in nature."

Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta ruled that the non-payment of salary and bonuses, even if proven, did not amount to cheating or breach of trust. The Court observed that there was no evidence of fraudulent intent or dishonest inducement at the time of hiring, which are essential elements for an offense under Sections 420 and 406. The Court relied on precedents, including Govind Prasad Kejriwal v. State of Bihar, which held that civil disputes should not be transformed into criminal cases.

The Court also criticized the lower court for failing to conduct an inquiry under Section 202 of the CrPC before issuing summons, as the accused resided outside its jurisdiction.

The Calcutta High Court quashed the criminal proceedings and set aside the summons issued against the petitioners, reinforcing the principle that civil disputes over employment-related issues should not be pursued as criminal cases.

Date of Decision: October 4, 2024

Dasrathbhai Narsangbhai Chaudhary @ Dasrath Chaudhary & Another v. State of West Bengal

Latest Legal News