Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court Limitation | 1,142 Days of Silence: Orissa High Court Rejects Litigant's Claim That His Lawyer Never Called SC/ST Act's Bar on Anticipatory Bail Does Not Apply When Complaint Fails to Make Out Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Oral Agreement for Sale Cannot Be Dismissed for Want of Stamp or Registration: Calcutta High Court Upholds Injunction Finance Company's Own Legal Manager Cannot Appoint Arbitrator — Award Passed by Such Arbitrator Is Non-Est and Inexecutable: Andhra Pradesh High Court District Court Cannot Remand Charity Commissioner's Order: Bombay High Court Division Bench Settles Conflicting Views Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court Contributory Negligence | No Driving Licence and Three on a Motorcycle Cannot Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Rajasthan High Court LL.B Degree Cannot Be Ground to Deny Maintenance to Divorced Wife: Gujarat High Court Dried Leaves and Branches Are Not 'Ganja': Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under NDPS Act Family Court Judge Secretly Compared Handwriting Without Telling Wife, Then Punished Her Hesitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Divorce Decree Co-Owner Can Sell Undivided Share in Joint Property Without Consent of Other Co-owners — Sale Deed Valid to Extent of Transferor's Share: Orissa High Court Mandatory Safeguards of Section 42 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed — Even When 1329 Kg of Hashish Is Seized: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal

Non-Payment of Salary or Bonus Does Not Constitute Criminal Offense: Calcutta High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings

12 October 2024 1:11 PM

By: sayum


Calcutta High Court in Dasrathbhai Narsangbhai Chaudhary @ Dasrath Chaudhary & Another v. State of West Bengal (C.R.R. 1395 of 2022) quashed criminal proceedings against two former directors of a company accused of cheating and criminal breach of trust. The Court held that the dispute over unpaid salary and performance bonuses was civil in nature and did not meet the criteria for criminal prosecution under Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 (criminal breach of trust) of the Indian Penal Code.

The case involved a complaint filed by Debasis Majumdar, a former CEO of Safal Life Science (P) Ltd., alleging that the company and its former directors failed to pay him a salary and performance bonus totaling ₹1.47 crore. Majumdar worked for the company from April 2017 to March 2019, and despite repeated requests and legal notices, his dues were not settled. He initiated a criminal complaint, accusing the directors of cheating and breach of trust. The Judicial Magistrate took cognizance of the complaint and issued summons to the accused.

The former directors, Dasrathbhai Narsangbhai Chaudhary and another petitioner, challenged the proceedings in the High Court, arguing that the dispute was purely civil and that they had resigned from the company before the complaint was filed.

The primary legal question was whether the non-payment of salary and bonuses could be classified as cheating or criminal breach of trust under the Indian Penal Code.

The dispute was a civil matter concerning unpaid dues, which should be addressed through a civil suit, not a criminal proceeding.

They were no longer directors of the company at the time of the complaint, having resigned and transferred their shares in 2019.

The trial court failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 202 of the CrPC, as the accused resided outside the territorial jurisdiction of the court.

The Court found merit in these arguments, emphasizing that no fraudulent intent or dishonest inducement was demonstrated at the time of employment. It noted:

"The allegation in the complaint does not spell out any essential ingredient for the commission of offenses under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The disputes between the parties are purely civil in nature."

Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta ruled that the non-payment of salary and bonuses, even if proven, did not amount to cheating or breach of trust. The Court observed that there was no evidence of fraudulent intent or dishonest inducement at the time of hiring, which are essential elements for an offense under Sections 420 and 406. The Court relied on precedents, including Govind Prasad Kejriwal v. State of Bihar, which held that civil disputes should not be transformed into criminal cases.

The Court also criticized the lower court for failing to conduct an inquiry under Section 202 of the CrPC before issuing summons, as the accused resided outside its jurisdiction.

The Calcutta High Court quashed the criminal proceedings and set aside the summons issued against the petitioners, reinforcing the principle that civil disputes over employment-related issues should not be pursued as criminal cases.

Date of Decision: October 4, 2024

Dasrathbhai Narsangbhai Chaudhary @ Dasrath Chaudhary & Another v. State of West Bengal

Latest Legal News