Section 32 Arbitration Act | Termination for Non-Payment of Fees Ends Arbitrator’s Mandate; Remedy Lies in Section 14(2): Supreme Court False Allegations of Dowry and Bigamy Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madras High Court Upholds Divorce Plaintiff Must Prove Her Own Title Before Seeking Demolition Of Defendant’s Pre-existing House: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mismatch Between Bullet and Recovered Gun Fatal to Prosecution: Calcutta High Court Acquits Man Convicted for Murder Where the Conduct of the Sole Eye-Witness Appears Unnatural and No Independent Witness Is Examined, Conviction Cannot Stand: Allahabad High Court Fraudulent Sale of Vehicle During Hire Purchase Renders Agreement Void: Gauhati High Court Upholds Decree for Refund of ₹4.90 Lakhs Unsigned Written Statement Can’t Silence a Defendant: Hyper-Technical Objections Must Yield to Substantive Justice: Delhi High Court Default Bail | No Accused, No Extension: Delhi High Court Rules Custody Extension Without Notice as Gross Illegality Under Article 21 Gratuity Can Be Withheld Post-Retirement for Proven Negligence Under Service Rules – Payment of Gratuity Act Does Not Override CDA Rules: Calcutta High Court Cognizance Is of the Offence, Not the Offender: Madras High Court Rejects Challenge to ED’s Supplementary Complaint in PMLA Case Acquittal in Rajasthan No Bar to Trial in Madhya Pradesh: MP High Court Rejects Double Jeopardy Plea in Antiquities Theft Case 20% Deposit Isn’t Automatic in Cheque Bounce Appeals: Right to Appeal Can’t Be Priced Out: Punjab & Haryana High Court Checks Mechanical Use of Section 148 NI Act A Child Is Not a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets New Benchmark in Compensation for Minors’ Deaths 90 Days Is Not Sacrosanct – Courts Can Permit Reply to Counter-Claim Even Beyond Prescribed Time in Interest of Justice: Punjab & Haryana High Court Magistrate Can Proceed Only for Offences Committed in India Until Sanction Is Obtained for Acts Outside India: Orissa High Court on International Financial Fraud Award Is Vitiated by Non-Consideration of Material Evidence: Orissa High Court Sets Aside Industrial Tribunal’s Wage Award in IMFA Case POCSO | Absence of Child's Name in Birth Certificate Not Fatal: Kerala High Court No One Has the Right to Impute Illicit Motives to Judges in the Name of Free Speech: Karnataka High Court Jails Man for Criminal Contempt DV Complaint Cannot Be Quashed at Threshold Under Article 227: Madras High Court Refuses to Interfere, Directs Accused to Seek Remedy Before Magistrate Recovery Wasn't From Accused's Exclusive Knowledge — Cylinder Already Marked in Site Plan Before Arrest: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man in Murder Case State Can’t Block SARFAESI Sale by Late Revenue Entries: Secured Creditor’s Charge Prevails Over Tax Dues: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slams Sub-Registrar’s Refusal Providing SIM Card Without Knowledge of Its Criminal Use Does Not Imply Criminal Conspiracy: P&H High Court Grants Bail in UAPA & Murder Case Importer Who Accepts Enhanced Valuation Cannot Later Contest Confiscation and Penalty for Undervaluation: Madras High Court Upholds Strict Liability under Customs Act "Allegations Are Not Proof: Madras High Court Refuses Divorce Without Substantiated Cruelty or Desertion" When FIR Is Filed After Consulting Political Leaders, the Possibility of Coloured Version Cannot Be Ruled Out: Kerala High Court Mere Allegations of Antecedents Without Conviction Can't Defeat Right to Anticipatory Bail: Kerala High Court Section 106 Of Evidence Act Cannot Be Invoked In Vacuum – Prosecution Must First Lay Foundational Facts: Karnataka High Court Acquits Wife And Co-Accused In Husband’s Murder Case Parity Cannot Be Claimed When Roles Are Different: Karnataka High Court Refuses Bail to Youth Accused of Brutal Killing Injured Wife Would Not Falsely Implicate Her Husband: Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction in Domestic Stabbing Case Disputed Bids, Missing Evidence and No Prejudice: Delhi High Court Refuses to Intervene in Tender Challenge under Article 226 Setting Fire to House Where Only Minors Were Present is a Heinous Offence – No Quashing Merely Because Parties Settled: Calcutta High Court No Exclusive Possession Means Licence, Not Lease: Calcutta High Court Rules City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Evict Licensees Defendant's Own Family Attested the Sale Agreement – Yet She Called It Nominal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Specific Performance Renewal Not Automatic, No Evidence Of Notice Or Mutual Agreement: AP High Court Dismisses Indian Oil’s Appeal Against Eviction

Non-Payment of Salary or Bonus Does Not Constitute Criminal Offense: Calcutta High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings

12 October 2024 1:11 PM

By: sayum


Calcutta High Court in Dasrathbhai Narsangbhai Chaudhary @ Dasrath Chaudhary & Another v. State of West Bengal (C.R.R. 1395 of 2022) quashed criminal proceedings against two former directors of a company accused of cheating and criminal breach of trust. The Court held that the dispute over unpaid salary and performance bonuses was civil in nature and did not meet the criteria for criminal prosecution under Sections 420 (cheating) and 406 (criminal breach of trust) of the Indian Penal Code.

The case involved a complaint filed by Debasis Majumdar, a former CEO of Safal Life Science (P) Ltd., alleging that the company and its former directors failed to pay him a salary and performance bonus totaling ₹1.47 crore. Majumdar worked for the company from April 2017 to March 2019, and despite repeated requests and legal notices, his dues were not settled. He initiated a criminal complaint, accusing the directors of cheating and breach of trust. The Judicial Magistrate took cognizance of the complaint and issued summons to the accused.

The former directors, Dasrathbhai Narsangbhai Chaudhary and another petitioner, challenged the proceedings in the High Court, arguing that the dispute was purely civil and that they had resigned from the company before the complaint was filed.

The primary legal question was whether the non-payment of salary and bonuses could be classified as cheating or criminal breach of trust under the Indian Penal Code.

The dispute was a civil matter concerning unpaid dues, which should be addressed through a civil suit, not a criminal proceeding.

They were no longer directors of the company at the time of the complaint, having resigned and transferred their shares in 2019.

The trial court failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 202 of the CrPC, as the accused resided outside the territorial jurisdiction of the court.

The Court found merit in these arguments, emphasizing that no fraudulent intent or dishonest inducement was demonstrated at the time of employment. It noted:

"The allegation in the complaint does not spell out any essential ingredient for the commission of offenses under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The disputes between the parties are purely civil in nature."

Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta ruled that the non-payment of salary and bonuses, even if proven, did not amount to cheating or breach of trust. The Court observed that there was no evidence of fraudulent intent or dishonest inducement at the time of hiring, which are essential elements for an offense under Sections 420 and 406. The Court relied on precedents, including Govind Prasad Kejriwal v. State of Bihar, which held that civil disputes should not be transformed into criminal cases.

The Court also criticized the lower court for failing to conduct an inquiry under Section 202 of the CrPC before issuing summons, as the accused resided outside its jurisdiction.

The Calcutta High Court quashed the criminal proceedings and set aside the summons issued against the petitioners, reinforcing the principle that civil disputes over employment-related issues should not be pursued as criminal cases.

Date of Decision: October 4, 2024

Dasrathbhai Narsangbhai Chaudhary @ Dasrath Chaudhary & Another v. State of West Bengal

Latest Legal News