Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court Daily-Wage Employees Treated As Permanent Under 1988 Government Resolution Entitled To Annual Increment Benefits: Supreme Court

Non-Appearance Despite Repeated Warnings - Persistent Evasion from CBI Bribery Case Proceedings Leads to Justified NBW: Delhi HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 

 In a significant ruling, the High Court of Delhi, presided over by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, dismissed the petition of Rajeev Jhawar, who sought quashing of Non-Bailable Warrants (NBW) issued against him in a money laundering case. The Court held that "the impugned order dated 02.02.2024 suffers from no illegality or infirmity" and justified the issuance of NBW due to the petitioner's repeated failure to appear physically despite clear court orders.

 

Factual Background: The case revolves around allegations of bribery involving Rajeev Jhawar, the Managing Director of M/s. Usha Martin Ltd., for influencing a CBI investigation. Following an investigation by CBI and Directorate of Enforcement, Jhawar was accused under various sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

 

The Court meticulously reviewed the sequence of events and submissions. Jhawar's repeated non-compliance and absence, despite multiple opportunities given by the Court, played a crucial role in the decision. The Court observed that the petitioner, who had been residing in Singapore, failed to appear before the Trial Court and the Investigating Officer, thus necessitating the issuance of NBW as a coercive measure.

 

Judicial Discretion in Issuing NBWs: The Court noted that the issuance of NBW is a balance between personal liberty and societal interest. It underscored that NBW should be issued to bring a person to court when summons or bailable warrants would be unlikely to have the desired result.

 

Non-Appearance of Accused: The Court remarked that the consistent avoidance of court proceedings by the accused warranted the issuance of NBW.

 

Impact on Judicial Process: The Court highlighted that repeated non-appearance impedes the judicial process, and issuing NBW is a necessary tool in such situations.

 

Decision: The High Court dismissed the application seeking quashing of NBW and upheld the issuance of NBW against Rajeev Jhawar. However, the Court clarified that the observations made should not affect the merits of the case.

Date of Decision: April 1, 2024

Rajeev Jhawar vs Directorate of Enforcement

Latest Legal News