CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Non-Appearance Despite Repeated Warnings - Persistent Evasion from CBI Bribery Case Proceedings Leads to Justified NBW: Delhi HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 

 In a significant ruling, the High Court of Delhi, presided over by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, dismissed the petition of Rajeev Jhawar, who sought quashing of Non-Bailable Warrants (NBW) issued against him in a money laundering case. The Court held that "the impugned order dated 02.02.2024 suffers from no illegality or infirmity" and justified the issuance of NBW due to the petitioner's repeated failure to appear physically despite clear court orders.

 

Factual Background: The case revolves around allegations of bribery involving Rajeev Jhawar, the Managing Director of M/s. Usha Martin Ltd., for influencing a CBI investigation. Following an investigation by CBI and Directorate of Enforcement, Jhawar was accused under various sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

 

The Court meticulously reviewed the sequence of events and submissions. Jhawar's repeated non-compliance and absence, despite multiple opportunities given by the Court, played a crucial role in the decision. The Court observed that the petitioner, who had been residing in Singapore, failed to appear before the Trial Court and the Investigating Officer, thus necessitating the issuance of NBW as a coercive measure.

 

Judicial Discretion in Issuing NBWs: The Court noted that the issuance of NBW is a balance between personal liberty and societal interest. It underscored that NBW should be issued to bring a person to court when summons or bailable warrants would be unlikely to have the desired result.

 

Non-Appearance of Accused: The Court remarked that the consistent avoidance of court proceedings by the accused warranted the issuance of NBW.

 

Impact on Judicial Process: The Court highlighted that repeated non-appearance impedes the judicial process, and issuing NBW is a necessary tool in such situations.

 

Decision: The High Court dismissed the application seeking quashing of NBW and upheld the issuance of NBW against Rajeev Jhawar. However, the Court clarified that the observations made should not affect the merits of the case.

Date of Decision: April 1, 2024

Rajeev Jhawar vs Directorate of Enforcement

Latest Legal News