Even 1.5 Years in Jail Doesn’t Dilute Section 37 NDPS Rigour: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail in 710 Kg Poppy Husk Case Stay of Conviction Nullifies Disqualification Under Section 8(3) RP Act: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Quo Warranto Against Rahul Gandhi Custodial Interrogation Necessary to Uncover ₹2 Crore MGNREGA Scam: Kerala High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail for Vendors in Corruption Case Order 41 Rule 23 CPC | Trial Court Cannot Decide Title Solely on a Vacated Judgment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Strikes By Bar Associations Cannot Stall Justice: Allahabad High Court Holds Office Bearers Liable for Contempt if Revenue Suits Are Delayed Due to Boycotts To Constitute a Service PE, Services Must Be Furnished Within India Through Employees Present in India: Delhi High Court Medical Negligence | State Liable for Loss of Vision in Botched Cataract Surgeries: Gauhati High Court Awards Compensation Waiver of Right Under Section 50 NDPS is Valid Even Without Panch Signatures: Bombay High Court Agricultural Land Is 'Property' Under Hindu Women’s Right to Property Act, 1937: A.P. High Court Tenant Who Pays Rent After Verifying Landlord’s Will Cannot Dispute His Title Under Section 116 Evidence Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Dismisses Eviction Challenge by HP State Cooperative Bank Clever Drafting Cannot Override Limitation Bar: Gujarat High Court Rejects Suit for Specific Performance Once Divorce by Mutual Consent Is Final, Wife Cannot Pursue Criminal Case for Stridhan Without Reserving Right to Do So: Himachal Pradesh High Court Caste-Based Insults Must Show Intent – Mere Abuse Not Enough for Atrocities Act: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Represent to Detaining Authority Vitiates NSA Detention: Gauhati High Court Awarding Further Interest On Penal Charges Is Contrary To Fundamental Policy Of Indian Arbitration Law: Bombay High Court

Non-Appearance Despite Repeated Warnings - Persistent Evasion from CBI Bribery Case Proceedings Leads to Justified NBW: Delhi HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 

 In a significant ruling, the High Court of Delhi, presided over by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, dismissed the petition of Rajeev Jhawar, who sought quashing of Non-Bailable Warrants (NBW) issued against him in a money laundering case. The Court held that "the impugned order dated 02.02.2024 suffers from no illegality or infirmity" and justified the issuance of NBW due to the petitioner's repeated failure to appear physically despite clear court orders.

 

Factual Background: The case revolves around allegations of bribery involving Rajeev Jhawar, the Managing Director of M/s. Usha Martin Ltd., for influencing a CBI investigation. Following an investigation by CBI and Directorate of Enforcement, Jhawar was accused under various sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

 

The Court meticulously reviewed the sequence of events and submissions. Jhawar's repeated non-compliance and absence, despite multiple opportunities given by the Court, played a crucial role in the decision. The Court observed that the petitioner, who had been residing in Singapore, failed to appear before the Trial Court and the Investigating Officer, thus necessitating the issuance of NBW as a coercive measure.

 

Judicial Discretion in Issuing NBWs: The Court noted that the issuance of NBW is a balance between personal liberty and societal interest. It underscored that NBW should be issued to bring a person to court when summons or bailable warrants would be unlikely to have the desired result.

 

Non-Appearance of Accused: The Court remarked that the consistent avoidance of court proceedings by the accused warranted the issuance of NBW.

 

Impact on Judicial Process: The Court highlighted that repeated non-appearance impedes the judicial process, and issuing NBW is a necessary tool in such situations.

 

Decision: The High Court dismissed the application seeking quashing of NBW and upheld the issuance of NBW against Rajeev Jhawar. However, the Court clarified that the observations made should not affect the merits of the case.

Date of Decision: April 1, 2024

Rajeev Jhawar vs Directorate of Enforcement

Latest Legal News