Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

"No Proximity Between Alleged Act and Suicide": Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Acquittal in Abetment Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court today upheld the acquittal of Rani Devi and others in a case involving the alleged abetment of suicide of Jagan Nath. The court, presided over by Justice Harpreet Singh Brar, emphasized the lack of direct connection between the accused's actions and the suicide, stating, "there is no proximity between the alleged act of the accused-respondent and suicide of the deceased."

The case, registered under various sections of the Indian Penal Code including Section 306 for abetment of suicide, stemmed from the suicide of Jagan Nath, who was allegedly harassed over a monetary dispute. The petitioner, the State of Haryana, challenged the earlier acquittal, citing suicide notes that blamed the respondents for the deceased's extreme step.

However, the court observed that "mens rea, which forms the basis of instigation of this extent, is also completely missing." The court relied on Supreme Court precedents that require clear mens rea (intention) for conviction under Section 306 IPC. The court referred to the case of Gangula Mohan Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh, reiterating that without a positive act of instigation or aiding in committing suicide, conviction cannot be sustained.

Furthermore, the court cited the recent Supreme Court judgment in Mohit Singhal and Another v. State of Uttarakhand and others, highlighting the necessity for an act of instigation to be in close proximity to the act of committing suicide. The High Court found no such proximity in this case.

In its judgment, the High Court also discussed the appellate court's role in reviewing acquittal cases, emphasizing the principle that if two reasonable conclusions are possible, the one favoring the accused should prevail.

This judgment reaffirms the stringent standards required for proving abetment to suicide, a significant aspect in criminal law, underscoring the necessity of clear intention and direct connection between the accused's actions and the suicide for a conviction. The dismissal of the appeal by the High Court marks the conclusion of a closely watched legal battle, setting a precedent for future cases of a similar nature.

DATE: 11th December 2023           

STATE OF HARYANA Vs. RANI DEVI AND OTHERS  

Latest Legal News