Section 32 Arbitration Act | Termination for Non-Payment of Fees Ends Arbitrator’s Mandate; Remedy Lies in Section 14(2): Supreme Court False Allegations of Dowry and Bigamy Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madras High Court Upholds Divorce Plaintiff Must Prove Her Own Title Before Seeking Demolition Of Defendant’s Pre-existing House: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mismatch Between Bullet and Recovered Gun Fatal to Prosecution: Calcutta High Court Acquits Man Convicted for Murder Where the Conduct of the Sole Eye-Witness Appears Unnatural and No Independent Witness Is Examined, Conviction Cannot Stand: Allahabad High Court Fraudulent Sale of Vehicle During Hire Purchase Renders Agreement Void: Gauhati High Court Upholds Decree for Refund of ₹4.90 Lakhs Unsigned Written Statement Can’t Silence a Defendant: Hyper-Technical Objections Must Yield to Substantive Justice: Delhi High Court Default Bail | No Accused, No Extension: Delhi High Court Rules Custody Extension Without Notice as Gross Illegality Under Article 21 Gratuity Can Be Withheld Post-Retirement for Proven Negligence Under Service Rules – Payment of Gratuity Act Does Not Override CDA Rules: Calcutta High Court Cognizance Is of the Offence, Not the Offender: Madras High Court Rejects Challenge to ED’s Supplementary Complaint in PMLA Case Acquittal in Rajasthan No Bar to Trial in Madhya Pradesh: MP High Court Rejects Double Jeopardy Plea in Antiquities Theft Case 20% Deposit Isn’t Automatic in Cheque Bounce Appeals: Right to Appeal Can’t Be Priced Out: Punjab & Haryana High Court Checks Mechanical Use of Section 148 NI Act A Child Is Not a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets New Benchmark in Compensation for Minors’ Deaths 90 Days Is Not Sacrosanct – Courts Can Permit Reply to Counter-Claim Even Beyond Prescribed Time in Interest of Justice: Punjab & Haryana High Court Magistrate Can Proceed Only for Offences Committed in India Until Sanction Is Obtained for Acts Outside India: Orissa High Court on International Financial Fraud Award Is Vitiated by Non-Consideration of Material Evidence: Orissa High Court Sets Aside Industrial Tribunal’s Wage Award in IMFA Case POCSO | Absence of Child's Name in Birth Certificate Not Fatal: Kerala High Court No One Has the Right to Impute Illicit Motives to Judges in the Name of Free Speech: Karnataka High Court Jails Man for Criminal Contempt DV Complaint Cannot Be Quashed at Threshold Under Article 227: Madras High Court Refuses to Interfere, Directs Accused to Seek Remedy Before Magistrate Recovery Wasn't From Accused's Exclusive Knowledge — Cylinder Already Marked in Site Plan Before Arrest: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man in Murder Case State Can’t Block SARFAESI Sale by Late Revenue Entries: Secured Creditor’s Charge Prevails Over Tax Dues: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slams Sub-Registrar’s Refusal Providing SIM Card Without Knowledge of Its Criminal Use Does Not Imply Criminal Conspiracy: P&H High Court Grants Bail in UAPA & Murder Case Importer Who Accepts Enhanced Valuation Cannot Later Contest Confiscation and Penalty for Undervaluation: Madras High Court Upholds Strict Liability under Customs Act "Allegations Are Not Proof: Madras High Court Refuses Divorce Without Substantiated Cruelty or Desertion" When FIR Is Filed After Consulting Political Leaders, the Possibility of Coloured Version Cannot Be Ruled Out: Kerala High Court Mere Allegations of Antecedents Without Conviction Can't Defeat Right to Anticipatory Bail: Kerala High Court Section 106 Of Evidence Act Cannot Be Invoked In Vacuum – Prosecution Must First Lay Foundational Facts: Karnataka High Court Acquits Wife And Co-Accused In Husband’s Murder Case Parity Cannot Be Claimed When Roles Are Different: Karnataka High Court Refuses Bail to Youth Accused of Brutal Killing Injured Wife Would Not Falsely Implicate Her Husband: Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction in Domestic Stabbing Case Disputed Bids, Missing Evidence and No Prejudice: Delhi High Court Refuses to Intervene in Tender Challenge under Article 226 Setting Fire to House Where Only Minors Were Present is a Heinous Offence – No Quashing Merely Because Parties Settled: Calcutta High Court No Exclusive Possession Means Licence, Not Lease: Calcutta High Court Rules City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Evict Licensees Defendant's Own Family Attested the Sale Agreement – Yet She Called It Nominal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Specific Performance Renewal Not Automatic, No Evidence Of Notice Or Mutual Agreement: AP High Court Dismisses Indian Oil’s Appeal Against Eviction

“Lok Sabha Clears Online Gaming Bill: Betting Apps Banned, E-Sports Backed”

21 August 2025 11:20 AM

By: sayum


New Delhi, August 21, 2025: The Lok Sabha has passed the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025, a landmark legislation that draws a sharp line between recreational gaming and betting apps. The Bill seeks to prohibit all real-money online gaming platforms—from poker and rummy to fantasy sports—while simultaneously encouraging the growth of e-sports and educational gaming.

Union Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw, while piloting the Bill, warned: “The addiction to online money games is worse than drugs. Families are being destroyed, children are being trapped, and even national security is at stake due to money laundering through these apps.”

“No More Betting: Real-Money Gaming Declared Illegal”

The Bill categorically bans all forms of online real-money games, whether of skill or chance. Platforms offering these services will no longer be able to advertise, transact, or operate within India. The government has also barred celebrities from endorsing such platforms. “No famous personality will be allowed to mislead the youth into financial ruin,” the Minister stated.

Violators of the law face strict penalties: up to three years of imprisonment and fines reaching ₹1 crore for first-time offenders, and up to five years with fines of ₹2 crore for repeat violations.

“National Regulator to Oversee the Digital Playground”

The legislation establishes a National Online Gaming Commission (NOGC), a central authority that will regulate, license, and monitor permissible gaming activities. This regulator will also implement consumer safeguards such as age-verification, deposit limits, and grievance redressal systems.

According to the draft framework, the government has allocated ₹50 crore in initial funding and expects to spend around ₹20 crore annually on running the authority.

“Addiction, Debt, and Crime: The Social Justification”

The government defended the legislation citing an alarming rise in gaming-related addiction, suicides, and financial crimes. “We cannot allow our youth to fall prey to manipulative apps designed only to extract money,” said a senior official during the debate. The Bill also flags money laundering and terror financing risks as critical reasons for the crackdown.

“Industry Sees Red: Stocks Slide, Jobs at Risk”

The passage of the Bill has sent shockwaves through the gaming industry. Shares of Nazara Technologies and Delta Corp fell by up to seven percent soon after Cabinet clearance of the draft.

Congress MP Karti Chidambaram voiced sharp opposition: “This law will kill four lakh jobs, drive out $6 billion of investments, and force players to unregulated offshore apps and the dark web. The government must send this Bill to a parliamentary committee before bulldozing it into law.”

“Safe Gaming, Not Banned Gaming”

Interestingly, while banning money games, the government has chosen to support the booming e-sports sector. The Bill promotes games that are educational, social, or competitive in nature without monetary stakes. The Minister noted: “E-sports and innovation-driven gaming will flourish in India. This Bill ensures we protect our youth while boosting safe entertainment and digital entrepreneurship.”

The Online Gaming Bill, 2025 is one of the most ambitious attempts to regulate India’s rapidly expanding digital gaming ecosystem. While the government hails it as a safeguard against addiction and crime, critics warn of economic repercussions and regulatory overreach. Whether it becomes a shield for society or a setback for innovation will depend on how the law is enforced and how the industry adapts in the coming months.

Latest Legal News