CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Interim Maintenance Modified in Light of Changed Circumstances and Financial Capacity: Delhi High Court Reduces Husband’s Maintenance Obligation

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has modified an order of interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956, revising the amount payable by the husband following a careful assessment of the changed financial circumstances of the parties involved. The original order, dated January 29, 2019, had directed the husband, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Baranwal, to pay a cumulative sum of Rs. 66,000 per month to his wife, Mrs. Bhavna Kumari, and their two daughters amidst divorce proceedings.

The couple, married on March 8, 2000, encountered marital discord leading to multiple litigations. In March 2018, the husband filed a divorce petition, and the wife sought interim maintenance, originally requesting Rs. 1,25,000 per month. The Family Court initially set the maintenance at Rs. 66,000 per month, dividing the husband's disposable income of Rs. 1,10,000 into equal shares for himself, his wife, and their two daughters.

The High Court, upon reviewing the husband’s financial records from 2018 and 2022, noted only minor variations in his salary and significant future savings, countering his claim of reduced financial capacity. The husband's plea for modification was based on several grounds: the elder daughter's attainment of majority and employment in the USA, a reduction in his salary, increased rent and medical expenses, and the wife’s potential to earn.

The wife contested these claims, highlighting her health issues, the need for knee surgery, and her role in supporting their younger daughter's education. The court acknowledged the elder daughter's recent employment post-graduation and considered this in modifying the maintenance.

Justice Amit Bansal, delivering the judgment, ruled that the interim maintenance be reduced from Rs. 66,000 to Rs. 44,000 per month, effective from July 2023, in light of the elder daughter’s employment. The court directed the husband to clear any arrears within four weeks and urged the Family Court to conclude the divorce proceedings expeditiously.

Date of Decision: March 28, 2024,

Sanjay Kumar Baranwal vs. Bhavna Kumari

Latest Legal News