Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court Daily-Wage Employees Treated As Permanent Under 1988 Government Resolution Entitled To Annual Increment Benefits: Supreme Court

Interim Maintenance Modified in Light of Changed Circumstances and Financial Capacity: Delhi High Court Reduces Husband’s Maintenance Obligation

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has modified an order of interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956, revising the amount payable by the husband following a careful assessment of the changed financial circumstances of the parties involved. The original order, dated January 29, 2019, had directed the husband, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Baranwal, to pay a cumulative sum of Rs. 66,000 per month to his wife, Mrs. Bhavna Kumari, and their two daughters amidst divorce proceedings.

The couple, married on March 8, 2000, encountered marital discord leading to multiple litigations. In March 2018, the husband filed a divorce petition, and the wife sought interim maintenance, originally requesting Rs. 1,25,000 per month. The Family Court initially set the maintenance at Rs. 66,000 per month, dividing the husband's disposable income of Rs. 1,10,000 into equal shares for himself, his wife, and their two daughters.

The High Court, upon reviewing the husband’s financial records from 2018 and 2022, noted only minor variations in his salary and significant future savings, countering his claim of reduced financial capacity. The husband's plea for modification was based on several grounds: the elder daughter's attainment of majority and employment in the USA, a reduction in his salary, increased rent and medical expenses, and the wife’s potential to earn.

The wife contested these claims, highlighting her health issues, the need for knee surgery, and her role in supporting their younger daughter's education. The court acknowledged the elder daughter's recent employment post-graduation and considered this in modifying the maintenance.

Justice Amit Bansal, delivering the judgment, ruled that the interim maintenance be reduced from Rs. 66,000 to Rs. 44,000 per month, effective from July 2023, in light of the elder daughter’s employment. The court directed the husband to clear any arrears within four weeks and urged the Family Court to conclude the divorce proceedings expeditiously.

Date of Decision: March 28, 2024,

Sanjay Kumar Baranwal vs. Bhavna Kumari

Latest Legal News