Trademark Pirates Face Legal Wrath: Delhi HC Enforces Radio Mirchi’s IP Rights Swiftly Madras High Court Upholds Extended Adjudication Period Under Customs Act Amid Allegations of Systemic Lapses Disputes Over Religious Office Will Be Consolidated for Efficient Adjudication, Holds Karnataka High Court Motive Alone, Without Corroborative Evidence, Insufficient for Conviction : High Court Acquits Accused in 1993 Murder Case Himachal Pradesh HC Criticizes State for Delays: Orders Timely Action on Employee Grievances Calls for Pragmatic Approach to Desertion and Cruelty in Divorce Cases: Calcutta High Court Orders Fresh Trial Juvenile Tried as Adult: Bombay High Court Validates JJB Decision, Modifies Sentence to 7 Years Retrospective Application of Amended Rules for Redeployment Declared Invalid: Orissa High Court NDPS Act Leaves No Room for Leniency: HC Requires Substantial Proof of Innocence for Bail Delays in processing applications for premature release cannot deprive convicts of interim relief: Karnataka High Court Grants 90-Day Parole Listing All Appeals Arising From A Common Judgment Before The Same Bench Avoids Contradictory Rulings: Full Bench of the Patna High Court. Age Claims in Borderline Cases Demand Scrutiny: Madhya Pradesh HC on Juvenile Justice Act Bishop Garden Not Available for Partition Due to Legal Quietus on Declaration Suit: Madras High Court Exclusion of Certain Heirs Alone Does Not Make a Will Suspicious: Kerala High Court Upholds Validity of Will Proof of Delivery Was Never Requested, Nor Was it a Payment Precondition: Delhi High Court Held Courier Firm Entitled to Payment Despite Non-Delivery Allegations Widowed Daughter Eligible for Compassionate Appointment under BSNL Scheme: Allahabad High Court Brutality of an Offence Does Not Dispense With Legal Proof: Supreme Court Overturns Life Imprisonment of Two Accused Marumakkathayam Law | Partition Is An Act By Which The Nature Of The Property Is Changed, Reflecting An Alteration In Ownership: Supreme Court Motor Accident Claim | Compensation Must Aim To Restore, As Far As Possible, What Has Been Irretrievably Lost: Supreme Court Awards Rs. 1.02 Crore Personal Criticism Of Judges Or Recording Findings On Their Conduct In Judgments Must Be Avoided: Supreme Court Efficiency In Arbitral Proceedings Is Integral To Effective Dispute Resolution. Courts Must Ensure That Arbitral Processes Reach Their Logical End: Supreme Court Onus Lies On The Propounder To Remove All Suspicious Circumstances Surrounding A Will To The Satisfaction Of The Court: Calcutta High Court Deeds of Gift Not Governed by Section 22-B of Registration Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Testimony Of  Injured Witness Carries A Built-In Guarantee Of Truthfulness: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempted Murder POCSO | Conviction Cannot Be Sustained Without Conclusive Proof Of Minority - Burden Lies On The Prosecution: Telangana High Court Credible Eyewitness Account, Supported By Forensic Corroboration, Creates An Unassailable Chain Of Proof That Withstands Scrutiny: Punjab and Haryana High Court Jammu & Kashmir High Court Grants Bail to Schizophrenic Mother Accused of Murdering Infant Son

'Insufficient Evidence Cannot Override Statutory Obligations: Delhi High Court Affirms ESI Contribution Demand

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court has dismissed an appeal by M/s Gujral Tours & Travels Pvt. Ltd., upholding the order of the Employees' Insurance Court that mandated the company to contribute towards the Employees' State Insurance (ESI) fund. The judgment, delivered by Justice Dharmesh Sharma, highlights the insufficiency of evidence provided by the appellant and reaffirms the applicability of the ESI Act to establishments employing 20 or more employees.

The appellant, Gujral Tours & Travels Pvt. Ltd., challenged a trial court's order that dismissed their petition against the applicability of the ESI Act. The trial court's decision was based on an inspection conducted by the Social Security Officer (SSO) in 2009, which found that the company had 29 employees, making it liable for ESI contributions. The appellant contested the demand of Rs. 85,800 for the period from April 2009 to March 2020, along with an additional interest of Rs. 11,148.

Justice Sharma emphasized the validity of the inspection report prepared by the SSO, which documented the presence of 29 employees. The court noted that the hand-written list of employees, provided by the appellant's manager during the inspection, bore the company's stamp and was consistent with the names on the computer-generated wage register.

The appellant failed to produce crucial documents such as the attendance register and inspection book, which are mandated under Regulation 102A of the ESI (General) Regulations, 1950. The court observed that the computer-generated wage register (Ex. PW-1/3) lacked a supporting certificate under Section 65B(4) of the Indian Evidence Act, making it inadmissible as evidence.

The judgment reiterated that establishments employing 20 or more persons are covered under the ESI Act. The appellant's contention that the employees' gross salaries were above the threshold was not substantiated with reliable evidence. The court underscored that the burden of proof lay with the appellant, who failed to demonstrate that the salaries listed were net payments.

Justice Sharma remarked, "The petitioner has not produced its attendance register... there is no reason to disbelieve the contents of the list Ex. RW 1/1." He further stated, "The computer-generated copy Ex. PW 1/3 was not supported by a Certificate in terms of Section 65 B (4) of the Indian Evidence Act and was also inadmissible for being a ‘self-serving document’ in terms of Section 34 of the Indian Evidence Act."

The High Court's decision to uphold the trial court's order underscores the judiciary's commitment to ensuring compliance with statutory requirements under the ESI Act. This judgment sends a strong message to employers about the importance of maintaining accurate records and adhering to legal obligations for employee welfare. The dismissal of the appeal and the release of the deposited ESI dues to the respondent signal a reaffirmation of the legal framework governing employee insurance contributions.

 

Date of Decision: January 4, 2024

M/s Gujral Tours & Travels Pvt. Ltd. vs. Employees State Insurance Corporation

Similar News