Trial Courts Must Award Just Compensation In POCSO Cases Beyond Fine Amounts; Interim Payment No Reason To Deny Final Relief: Madras High Court Section 482 CrPC Power Not For Conducting 'Mini-Trial'; Disputed Facts Must Be Adjudicated At Trial: Allahabad High Court Right To Walk On Demarcated Footpaths Is A Fundamental Right; Municipal Authorities Under Enforceable Duty To Provide Pedestrian Infrastructure: Supreme Court Right To Walk Is A Fundamental Right Under Articles 19(1)(d) & 21; Priority Over Motorised Vehicles: Supreme Court Municipal Commissioner Is Disciplinary Authority For All Employees Post-1993 Amendment; Existing Regulations Can't Fetter Statutory Power: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Force Plaintiff To Accept Monetary Compensation Instead Of Removal Of Encroachment Without Prayer: Supreme Court Recruitment Merit Is Not A Vested Right; Public Interest Justifies Disclosing Marks Of Candidates Outside Selection Zone: Supreme Court Special Police Establishment Not An 'Intelligence & Security Organisation', State Cannot Exempt It From RTI Act: Supreme Court Medical Practitioner Not Negligent Merely Because Result Was A Failure If Procedure Adopted Was Acceptable To Medical Science: Calcutta High Court Long Service Cannot Be Denied Regularization On Mere Technicalities If Appointment Wasn't Illegal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejection Of Nomination Paper Can Only Be Challenged Through Election Petition; Article 329(b) Bars Writ Jurisdiction: Supreme Court NI Act | Benefit Of Presumptions Under Sections 118 & 139 Not Available If Complainant Lacks Direct Knowledge Of Transaction: Kerala High Court Landowners Entitled To Solatium Under National Highways Act; Failure To Grant Is Ground To Challenge Award Under Section 34: MP High Court Transfer Policy Only Broad Guideline, Not Enforceable Under Article 226/227 In Absence Of Mala Fides: Rajasthan High Court

Identification for the first time in Court without holding ‘Test Identification Parade’ creates serious doubt: Supreme Court Acquits In Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgement dated April 30, 2024, the Supreme Court of India has acquitted Suresh @ Unni @ Vadi Suresh of all charges in a 2006 criminal incident citing doubts over witness identification procedures and evidence credibility. The bench comprising Justices B.R. Gavai and Sandeep Mehta overturned previous convictions by the High Court and trial court, which had sustained multiple charges under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and other statutes against the appellant.

The appeal centered on the legal validity of witness identification and the subsequent handling of evidence in the case against Suresh, who had been accused of participating in a violent attack that led to one death and severe injuries to another in Kerala.

On March 6, 2006, a group allegedly attacked a video shop, resulting in the death of one person and injuries to another, identified as Ajeesh (PW-2). The group was accused of forming an unlawful assembly with deadly weapons and bombs. Suresh was later arrested in 2008, and despite multiple charges, the reliability of witness testimonies and evidence recovery was contested.

Witness Testimony and Identification: The Supreme Court highlighted significant delays in witness testimonies and pointed out that the appellant, Suresh, was identified in court for the first time years after the incident without a prior test identification parade, casting doubt on the identification's authenticity.

Evidence Recovery: The credibility of the recovery of an iron rod, purportedly used in the crime, was questioned. The court noted implausibility in the preservation of blood stains over an extended period which was subject to environmental exposure, including two monsoon seasons.

Motive and Misidentification: The court noted inconsistencies in the appellant's description and the absence of a direct motive linked to him, suggesting the possibility of mistaken identity.

Decision: The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the earlier judgements. The court acquitted Suresh of all charges, directing his immediate release unless required in another case. This decision underscores the necessity of rigorous standards in criminal identification and evidence handling.

Date of Decision: April 30, 2024

Suresh @ Unni @ Vadi Suresh Versus The State of Kerala

 

Latest Legal News