POCSO Trial Court Cannot Suo Motu Order Assistance Of Special Educator Without First Assessing Competency Of Victim: Madras High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Cannot Be Rejected On Ground Of Deceased Employee's Service Record If Not In Policy: Madhya Pradesh HC Limitation For Filing Written Statement In Commercial Suits Triggers From Service Of Summons With Plaint: Telangana High Court Administrative Order Using 'Unsatisfactory Performance' For Tenure Curtailment Not Stigmatic: Supreme Court ICAR Employees Do Not Hold 'Civil Posts', No Protection Under Article 311; No Enforceable Right To Complete Five-Year Tenure: Supreme Court Husband Cannot Claim Maintenance From Wife Under Section 144 BNSS (Section 125 CrPC): Allahabad High Court Imposes ₹15 Lakh Cost Divorce Petition Under Special Marriage Act Maintainable Even If Marriage Is Not Registered Under The Act: Karnataka High Court Section 82 CrPC Mandatory Procedure Must Be Strictly Followed To Declare A Person Proclaimed Offender: Punjab & Haryana High Court Schools Must Admit RTE Students Allotted By Govt Without Delay; Cannot Sit In Appeal Over State’s Decision: Supreme Court Insufficient Stamping Of Corporate Guarantee Is A Curable Defect, Won't Invalidate 'Financial Debt' Status Under IBC: Supreme Court Wildlife Species Ought Not To Be Confined To Cages Save In Exceptional Circumstances; Supreme Court Upholds Translocation Of Deer From Hauz Khas Park Digital Penetration Constitutes Rape Under Section 375(b) IPC; Degree Of Penetration Irrelevant: Bombay High Court (Goa Bench) Delhi High Court Denies Bail To 'Digital Arrest' Scam Accused; Says Mule Account Holders Are Important Cogs Of Conspiratorial Wheel Salary Is 'Property' Under Article 300-A, Cannot Be Withheld Without Due Process Of Law: Bombay High Court Inept Investigation Or Scripted Enquiry Fatal To Prosecution: Supreme Court Acquits 11 Convicts In Assam Murder Case Inconvenience Of Travel Not A Ground To Transfer Suit; Use Video Conferencing Or Commission For Evidence: Orissa High Court Part-Time Workers Serving For Decades Entitled To Regularization; 'Uma Devi' Ruling Cannot Be Weaponized To Deny Legitimate Claims: Rajasthan High Court Order Rejecting Or Allowing To Register FIR U/S Section 156(3) CrPC Application Is Not Interlocutory; Criminal Revision Is Maintainable: Punjab & Haryana High Court

However Dark the Past May Be, It Cannot Hold the Future Captive: Supreme Court Orders IPS Officer to Tender Public Apology in Divorce Settlement

23 July 2025 12:53 PM

By: sayum


In an extraordinary move aimed at achieving “complete justice” and emotional closure, the Supreme Court of India invoked its plenary powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to dissolve the marriage between an IPS officer Shivangi Bansal and her estranged husband Sahib Bansal, and ordered the publication of an unconditional apology from the wife to the husband and his family across national newspapers and social media.

The apology, dictated word-for-word by the Court, is to appear in one national English and one Hindi daily, and also be circulated through platforms like Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and others, reflecting the Court’s emphasis on public closure after a long-drawn-out legal battle. In words crafted to heal, the apology begins:

“I, Shivangi Bansal/Shivangi Goel… hereby sincerely apologise… I sincerely hope that this apology can be a step towards finding some peace and closure for all of us.”

The Court observed: “The expression of apology herein shall not be construed as an admission of liability… and shall not ever be used against [her] before any Court or Authority.”

This deeply personal and publicly mandated act was part of a comprehensive settlement between the parties, which included the quashing of all 25+ litigations, mutual waiver of maintenance and property rights, and a commitment never to initiate litigation or interfere in each other’s lives again.

The apex court’s ruling came in the context of multiple transfer petitions and special leave petitions filed by both sides, each alleging harassment, filing criminal cases against the other, and involving extended family members in a spiral of accusations. With emotions, reputations, and liberty all having been placed on the line, the parties finally opted for a comprehensive settlement.

“The Child Is at No Fault Whatsoever”: Custody Granted to Mother, Father Gets Structured Visitation

The couple married on 5th December 2015 and had a daughter, Raina, in 2016. After a separation in 2018, the child had been living with the mother. The Court, while recognizing this status quo, ruled:

“It is hereby ordered that the mother shall have the custody of the child… The father, Sahib Bansal and his family shall have supervised visitation rights…”

Importantly, the Court laid down a detailed structure for these visits, including monthly meetings and shared vacation time, but warned:

“Neither of the parties shall, in any manner, create any hindrance or impediment in the visitation rights.”

“No Order for Maintenance Is Being Passed”: Wife Waives All Claims to Alimony and Property

In a rare but voluntary move, the wife, an IPS officer, declared that she would not seek any financial support from her husband:

“The Wife has voluntarily agreed to forgo and waive her claim to any alimony or maintenance… and shall have no claim over any moveable and immoveable property…”

She also undertook to bear all expenses for raising their daughter, leading the Court to quash the Allahabad High Court’s prior direction to the husband to pay ₹1.5 lakh per month in child support.

“Let the Past Not Hold the Future Captive”: Apex Court Quashes All Cases Filed by Either Side

The bench took decisive action to halt the legal war, stating:

“To bring an end to the protracted legal battle… all pending criminal and civil litigations… are hereby quashed and/or withdrawn.”

The Court invoked Article 142 to wipe out an extraordinary list of proceedings—ranging from domestic violence cases and dowry harassment FIRs to defamation complaints and custody battles—that had been filed not only by the couple but also by and against their relatives. The Court added sternly:

“If any such proceeding is found to be initiated or pending at a later stage, the same would be tantamount to contempt of this Hon'ble Court.”

“Unconditional Apology Must Be Published in National Newspapers and Social Media”: A Rare and Public Gesture of Closure

As part of the final terms of settlement, the Supreme Court directed the wife to tender an unconditional public apology to the husband and his family for the trauma caused by the litigation. The apology, as dictated by the Court, was to be published in one national English and one Hindi newspaper, and on all major social media platforms.

The Court provided the exact text of the apology, which included: “I sincerely hope that this apology can be a step towards finding some peace and closure for all of us… However dark the past may be, it cannot hold the future captive.”

Importantly, the Court made clear that this apology: “Shall not be construed as an admission of liability… It is without prejudice and shall not ever be used against [her] before any Court or Authority.”

“No More Complaints, No More Litigation, No More Harm”: Both Parties Barred from Interfering in Each Other’s Life and Career

Recognizing the professional vulnerabilities of an IPS officer, the Court directed: “Shivangi Bansal shall never use her position and power as an IPS officer… against the husband, his Family Members and Relatives… in any manner whatsoever.”

Further, the Court imposed a permanent injunction on both parties from initiating any future legal proceedings, declaring: “Default on the part of any party will amount to contempt giving a right to the other party to directly approach this Court.”

“We Invoke Our Powers Under Article 142”: Marriage Dissolved by Supreme Court

The Court concluded with a definitive invocation of its constitutional authority: “We deem it appropriate to invoke our power under Article 142… and order for dissolution of marriage between Shivangi Bansal and Sahib Bansal.”

In doing so, the Court also expunged adverse remarks made earlier by the Allahabad High Court against the wife and granted police protection to the husband and his family.

In closing the final chapter of this bitter marital saga, the Court underscored its message of reconciliation and emotional healing, not just legal closure.

Date of Decision: 22 July 2025

 

Latest Legal News