Wife Exaggerating Husband's Income In Maintenance Affidavit Is Not Perjury: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Husband's Section 340 Application Candidate Cannot Be Faulted For Missing Disclaimers In Form-26 Supplied By Returning Officer: Bombay High Court Dismissal Without Departmental Enquiry Violates Natural Justice When Criminal Conviction Is Set Aside: Chhattisgarh High Court Orders Reinstatement Cipla MD Gets Relief: Himachal Pradesh HC Quashes Drug Prosecution For Absence of Specific Averment on Day-to-Day Role Mandatory Notice Under Section 106(3) Railways Act Applies To 'Overcharges', Not 'Illegal Charges': Gauhati High Court Insurer Can't Escape Paying Accident Victims Even With Invalid Licence Defence — Avoidance Clause In Policy Seals Liability: Gujarat High Court Fraud Vitiates All Solemn Acts — Once A Claim Is Founded On Fraud, The Entire Edifice Of The Claim Collapses And No Relief Can Be Granted: Supreme Court Like Cases Must Be Decided Alike": Orissa High Court Directs State To Pay Service Benefits To Deceased Employee's Heirs Claiming Parity Ancient Jain Idol Cannot Remain In Police Custody Under Treasure Trove Act: Allahabad High Court Orders Transfer To Museum Income Tax | Receivables For Warranty Reimbursements Constitute An 'Asset' Under Section 153A For Reopening Assessment: Delhi High Court Married Persons Cannot Claim Police Protection For Live-In Relationships Without First Obtaining Divorce: Allahabad High Court Breach Of Private Compromise Cannot Ipso Facto Trigger Cancellation Of Probation Granted On Legally Sustainable Grounds: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Interference Under Article 226 In Eviction Proceedings When Land Compensation Is Deposited In Competent Court: Kerala High Court "Immediately Preceding Three Years" For Land Compensation Must Be Calculated From Date Of Section 11 Notification, Not Calendar Year: Jharkhand High Court Contributory Negligence Cannot Be Attributed To Minor Children; State Strictly Liable For Unsecured Hazardous Reservoirs: J&K High Court Party Seeking Transfer Can't Hide Pending Transfer Petition From High Court: Karnataka HC Quashes Transfer Order Mother Can Represent Muslim Minor As 'Next Friend' In Civil Suit As CPC Provisions Are Secular And Not Tied To Personal Law: Calcutta High Court First Appellate Court Must Frame Points For Determination Under Order XLI Rule 31 CPC, Cannot Remand Cryptically: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Recovery Of Stolen Property Cannot Be Sole Basis For Murder Conviction If Chain Of Circumstances Is Broken: Bombay High Court MP Constable's Shell Company, Rs.6.44 Crore Properties, Ghost Cooperative Society: HC Rejects PMLA Bail of Director Who Had 'No Financial Capability' To Buy What He Bought

High Court Upholds Religious Institution’s Right to Self-Management: Management Cannot Be Deprived by Appointing Receiver Without Basis

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent decision, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Gurbir Singh, set a significant precedent regarding the management rights of religious institutions. The judgment centered on the dispute over the control of Dera Baba Jawahar Dass Ji, a well-known Sikh religious establishment in Village Soos, District Hoshiarpur.

Justice Singh, in his comprehensive ruling, emphasized that “management from the plaintiffs can only be taken back in accordance with law and not forcibly, and the same cannot be given to the Receiver without any basis.” This assertion underlines the court’s stance on preserving the sanctity and autonomy of religious institutions in managing their affairs.

The case revolved around a Charitable Trust formed to manage the Dera after the Gram Panchayat of Village Soos handed over its management. The defendants contested this move, leading to a legal battle that questioned the Trust’s legitimacy and the Gram Panchayat’s authority.

The High Court’s decision overturned the lower courts’ appointment of a Receiver-cum-Administrator, reinstating the plaintiffs’ management rights. “The appointment of Receiver is one of the extreme measures which the Court normally takes with a view to protect the property being squandered,” Justice Singh stated, highlighting the careful considerations necessary in such appointments.

The ruling has been hailed as a significant step in protecting the rights of religious institutions to self-governance. The court also emphasized the necessity for religious institutions managed by Trusts to maintain regular financial records, ensuring transparency and accountability.

Legal experts view this judgment as a reinforcement of religious institutions’ autonomy, setting a benchmark for future cases involving the management of religious properties. The case was represented by Mr. Amit Jhanji, Senior Advocate with Ms. Priyanka Kansal, Advocate for the petitioners, and Ms. Divya Jerath, Advocate for Mr. Navjot Singh, Advocate for the respondents.

This judgment is expected to have far-reaching implications, particularly in cases where the management rights of religious institutions are contested. The High Court’s decision is a reminder of the legal system’s role in upholding the principles of justice and fairness in the management of religious entities.

Date of Decision: 15 November  2023

Gurudwara Gurdarshan Parkash and another VS Rashpal Singh and others

 

Latest Legal News