Subsequent Declaration Of Juvenility Does Not Vitiate Conviction On Merits: Supreme Court Borrowers Cannot Ignore Bank Accounting Systems And Suspense Accounts To Claim Arbitrary Reductions In Loan Dues: Supreme Court Re-employed Judicial Officers Cannot Claim 6th Pay Commission Scales: Supreme Court Supreme Court Slams High Court For Erroneously Exercising Review Jurisdiction On 'Mistaken Notion', Restores Employee's ACP Benefits Trademark Infringement: Defendant Can Cross-Examine Plaintiff On Use Of Brand Name Even If Written Statement Is Not On Record: Supreme Court 'Interest And Welfare Of Child Would Be Best Served': Supreme Court Invokes Parens Patriae In Contempt Plea; Revokes Own Custody Order Mere Absence From MCA Records Cannot Absolve Accused Under Section 138 NI Act If Prima Facie Role Is Shown: Punjab & Haryana High Court Incomplete Or Defective Real Estate Application Cannot Claim Deemed Registration Under Section 5(2) Of RERA Act: Orissa High Court Mere Criminal Antecedents Cannot Justify Invoking 'Organized Crime' Offence Under Section 111 BNS Without Fulfilling Statutory Ingredients: Madhya Pradesh High Court 'Testator's Character & Prior Gifts Justify Unequal Distribution': Madras High Court Upholds Holographic Will Minority Status Cannot Arrest Limitation Period For Appeal If Minor Was Represented By Natural Guardian In Original Proceedings: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Admission Of Property Boundaries In Family Partition Deeds Destroys Coparceners' Claim That Land Remains Joint Ancestral Property: Karnataka High Court Mesne Profits Must Reflect Open Market Letting Value Rather Than Static Contractual Rates: Delhi High Court Law Graduates Who Fail To Clear AIBE Within Two Years Cannot Practice In Any Court, Tribunal Or Revenue Authority: Allahabad High Court Bombay High Court Slams 'Growing Tendency' To Bypass GST Appeals, Says 'Natural Justice' Not A Blanket Excuse For Writ Petitions Proportionate Cost Only Can Be Awarded On Decreed Amount, Not On Total Plaint Valuation: Kerala High Court

High Court Upholds Religious Institution’s Right to Self-Management: Management Cannot Be Deprived by Appointing Receiver Without Basis

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent decision, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Gurbir Singh, set a significant precedent regarding the management rights of religious institutions. The judgment centered on the dispute over the control of Dera Baba Jawahar Dass Ji, a well-known Sikh religious establishment in Village Soos, District Hoshiarpur.

Justice Singh, in his comprehensive ruling, emphasized that “management from the plaintiffs can only be taken back in accordance with law and not forcibly, and the same cannot be given to the Receiver without any basis.” This assertion underlines the court’s stance on preserving the sanctity and autonomy of religious institutions in managing their affairs.

The case revolved around a Charitable Trust formed to manage the Dera after the Gram Panchayat of Village Soos handed over its management. The defendants contested this move, leading to a legal battle that questioned the Trust’s legitimacy and the Gram Panchayat’s authority.

The High Court’s decision overturned the lower courts’ appointment of a Receiver-cum-Administrator, reinstating the plaintiffs’ management rights. “The appointment of Receiver is one of the extreme measures which the Court normally takes with a view to protect the property being squandered,” Justice Singh stated, highlighting the careful considerations necessary in such appointments.

The ruling has been hailed as a significant step in protecting the rights of religious institutions to self-governance. The court also emphasized the necessity for religious institutions managed by Trusts to maintain regular financial records, ensuring transparency and accountability.

Legal experts view this judgment as a reinforcement of religious institutions’ autonomy, setting a benchmark for future cases involving the management of religious properties. The case was represented by Mr. Amit Jhanji, Senior Advocate with Ms. Priyanka Kansal, Advocate for the petitioners, and Ms. Divya Jerath, Advocate for Mr. Navjot Singh, Advocate for the respondents.

This judgment is expected to have far-reaching implications, particularly in cases where the management rights of religious institutions are contested. The High Court’s decision is a reminder of the legal system’s role in upholding the principles of justice and fairness in the management of religious entities.

Date of Decision: 15 November  2023

Gurudwara Gurdarshan Parkash and another VS Rashpal Singh and others

 

Latest Legal News