Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry

High Court Upholds Religious Institution’s Right to Self-Management: Management Cannot Be Deprived by Appointing Receiver Without Basis

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent decision, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Gurbir Singh, set a significant precedent regarding the management rights of religious institutions. The judgment centered on the dispute over the control of Dera Baba Jawahar Dass Ji, a well-known Sikh religious establishment in Village Soos, District Hoshiarpur.

Justice Singh, in his comprehensive ruling, emphasized that “management from the plaintiffs can only be taken back in accordance with law and not forcibly, and the same cannot be given to the Receiver without any basis.” This assertion underlines the court’s stance on preserving the sanctity and autonomy of religious institutions in managing their affairs.

The case revolved around a Charitable Trust formed to manage the Dera after the Gram Panchayat of Village Soos handed over its management. The defendants contested this move, leading to a legal battle that questioned the Trust’s legitimacy and the Gram Panchayat’s authority.

The High Court’s decision overturned the lower courts’ appointment of a Receiver-cum-Administrator, reinstating the plaintiffs’ management rights. “The appointment of Receiver is one of the extreme measures which the Court normally takes with a view to protect the property being squandered,” Justice Singh stated, highlighting the careful considerations necessary in such appointments.

The ruling has been hailed as a significant step in protecting the rights of religious institutions to self-governance. The court also emphasized the necessity for religious institutions managed by Trusts to maintain regular financial records, ensuring transparency and accountability.

Legal experts view this judgment as a reinforcement of religious institutions’ autonomy, setting a benchmark for future cases involving the management of religious properties. The case was represented by Mr. Amit Jhanji, Senior Advocate with Ms. Priyanka Kansal, Advocate for the petitioners, and Ms. Divya Jerath, Advocate for Mr. Navjot Singh, Advocate for the respondents.

This judgment is expected to have far-reaching implications, particularly in cases where the management rights of religious institutions are contested. The High Court’s decision is a reminder of the legal system’s role in upholding the principles of justice and fairness in the management of religious entities.

Date of Decision: 15 November  2023

Gurudwara Gurdarshan Parkash and another VS Rashpal Singh and others

 

Latest Legal News