Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court Daily-Wage Employees Treated As Permanent Under 1988 Government Resolution Entitled To Annual Increment Benefits: Supreme Court

Driving 70 Feet Long Trailer Without Any Brake Light or Tail Lamps is a Grievous Negligence: Bombay High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Bombay High Court has held that driving a 70 feet long trailer without brake lights or tail lamps constitutes grievous negligence. The ruling came in the case of The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Mangal Ravindra Divate and Others.

The appeal concerned the attribution of negligence in a vehicular accident under the Motor Vehicles Act, focusing on whether the absence of tail lamps and brake lights on a trailer truck contributed to a fatal accident.

The incident involved a collision between a trailer truck and a Maruti car. The truck, lacking tail lamps and brake lights, was abruptly stopped on the road at night. The car driver, unable to notice the stationary trailer, crashed into it, leading to fatal injuries. The Tribunal earlier held both drivers 50% contributively negligent.

Negligence Attributed to Trailer Truck: The High Court found that the trailer truck’s lack of brake lights and tail lamps at night significantly contributed to the accident, overturning the Tribunal’s 50-50 negligence split. Justice Shivkumar Dige observed, “Had there been tail lamps or brake lights, the deceased could have noticed that the trailer is going to stop.”

Issue of Valid Driving License: The Court dismissed the Insurance Company’s claim that the truck driver lacked a valid license due to insufficient evidence, emphasizing the need for more robust proof.

Compensation Recalculation: Adjusting the Tribunal’s compensation assessment, the High Court reduced the non-pecuniary damages, recalculating the total compensation based on loss of dependency, consortium, loss of estate, and funeral expenses.

Judgment: The appeal was partially allowed. The Court granted enhanced compensation to the claimants, instructing the Insurance Company to deduct an excess amount awarded by the Tribunal and pay the remainder with interest.

Date of Decision: 12th March 2024

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Mangal Ravindra Divate and Others

Latest Legal News