Even 1.5 Years in Jail Doesn’t Dilute Section 37 NDPS Rigour: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail in 710 Kg Poppy Husk Case Stay of Conviction Nullifies Disqualification Under Section 8(3) RP Act: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Quo Warranto Against Rahul Gandhi Custodial Interrogation Necessary to Uncover ₹2 Crore MGNREGA Scam: Kerala High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail for Vendors in Corruption Case Order 41 Rule 23 CPC | Trial Court Cannot Decide Title Solely on a Vacated Judgment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Strikes By Bar Associations Cannot Stall Justice: Allahabad High Court Holds Office Bearers Liable for Contempt if Revenue Suits Are Delayed Due to Boycotts To Constitute a Service PE, Services Must Be Furnished Within India Through Employees Present in India: Delhi High Court Medical Negligence | State Liable for Loss of Vision in Botched Cataract Surgeries: Gauhati High Court Awards Compensation Waiver of Right Under Section 50 NDPS is Valid Even Without Panch Signatures: Bombay High Court Agricultural Land Is 'Property' Under Hindu Women’s Right to Property Act, 1937: A.P. High Court Tenant Who Pays Rent After Verifying Landlord’s Will Cannot Dispute His Title Under Section 116 Evidence Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Dismisses Eviction Challenge by HP State Cooperative Bank Clever Drafting Cannot Override Limitation Bar: Gujarat High Court Rejects Suit for Specific Performance Once Divorce by Mutual Consent Is Final, Wife Cannot Pursue Criminal Case for Stridhan Without Reserving Right to Do So: Himachal Pradesh High Court Caste-Based Insults Must Show Intent – Mere Abuse Not Enough for Atrocities Act: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Represent to Detaining Authority Vitiates NSA Detention: Gauhati High Court Awarding Further Interest On Penal Charges Is Contrary To Fundamental Policy Of Indian Arbitration Law: Bombay High Court

Delhi High Court Upholds Reliance on Income Tax Return in Motor Accident Compensation Appeal

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court upheld the reliance on the deceased's Income Tax Return for the Assessment Year 2008-09 in a Motor Accident Compensation Appeal. The case involved a challenge to the Impugned Award of a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, with the appellant disputing the quantum of compensation awarded to the respondent for loss of dependency.

In its observation, the High Court emphasized the importance of considering the Income Tax Return as a crucial document for determining the deceased's income, stating, "The Income Tax Return filed for the Assessment Year 2008-09, though filed after the accident, does not show any substantial increase in the income of the deceased. The only increase shown is found to be reasonable and genuine. It will reflect the income of the deceased more proximate to the date of the accident."

The judgment also cited precedent cases, including "Anjali & Ors. v. Lokendra Rathod & Ors., 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1683," which reaffirmed the significance of the Income Tax Return in calculating annual income for compensation purposes.

In light of these observations, the High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the compensation determined based on the deceased's Income Tax Return. The court also upheld the recovery rights granted in favor of the appellant by the learned Tribunal.

 

 Date of Decision: December 20, 2023

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD VS NISHI AND ORS

Latest Legal News