Married Daughter Cannot Be Excluded From Compassionate Appointment Solely On The Ground Of Marriage: Chhattisgarh High Court Allahabad HC Condemns Lawyers Seeking Adjournments To Attend District Courts Inherent Powers Under Section 151 CPC Cannot Be Invoked For Restoration Of Possession When Statutory Remedy Of Restitution Exists: Calcutta High Court Invoke Preventive Detention Laws Against Sand Mining Kingpins: Supreme Court Directs ED Probe To Protect Chambal Sanctuary Res Judicata Bars Pendente Lite Purchaser From Re-Agitating Impleadment Under Order XXII Rule 10 CPC If Rejected Under Order I Rule 10: Supreme Court Consumer Complaints Can Continue Against Promoters & Co-Developers Even If Corporate Debtor Is Under IBC Moratorium: Supreme Court IBC Moratorium Protects Only Corporate Debtor, Does Not Bar Consumer Complaints Against Promoters & Directors: Supreme Court Vehicle Registration Certificate Relevant But Not Conclusive For Deciding Interim Custody Under Section 451 CrPC: Supreme Court Lawyer Has No Unqualified Right To Continuous Presence During Entire Interrogation Under Section 38 BNSS: Supreme Court Mandating Continuous Videography Of Accused During Transit Is Unworkable, May Lead To Unfounded Allegations: Supreme Court Centre Introduces FCRA Amendment Bill 2026: Proposes Vesting Of Defunct NGO Assets In 'Designated Authority', Mandates Prior Nod For Probe Written Communication Of Grounds Of Arrest Not Mandatory For Arrests Prior To SC's 'Mihir Rajesh Shah' Judgment: Orissa High Court Passing Ex-Parte Maintenance Order Without Verifying Status Of WhatsApp Or Email Notice Violates Natural Justice: Madhya Pradesh High Court Training ChatGPT On Copyrighted News Is 'Fair Dealing', Does Not Amount To Infringement: Delhi High Court Refuses To Enjoin OpenAI Mere Reproduction Of Evidence Can Never Be Equated With Appreciation: Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Against Govt Employee Accused Cannot Repeatedly Send Cheque To FSL Till Favourable Report Is Obtained: Kerala High Court In NI Act Case Succession Certificate Cannot Be Issued For Gold Jewels Pledged With Bank, Applies Only To Debts And Securities: Madras High Court Order 11 Rule 14 CPC | Court Cannot Direct Production Of Documents Without Ascertaining They Are In Party's Possession: Calcutta High Court Undertrial Prisoners Don't Suffer 'Civil Death', Retain Fundamental Right To Alienate Property From Jail: Rajasthan High Court Direction For Reasonable Annual Enhancement Of Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Merely Preserves Its Real Value Against Inflation: Delhi High Court Testimony Of Sole Interested Witness Must Be Of 'Sterling Quality' To Base Conviction: Patna High Court Acquits Murder Convict Failure To Communicate Written Grounds Of Arrest Renders Arrest Constitutionally Infirm, Accused Entitled To Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 482 CrPC Petition Not Maintainable Against Order Framing Charge Under SC/ST Act, Appeal Lies Under Section 14A: Tripura High Court Disputed Questions Of Fact Regarding Title And Forged Documents Cannot Be Decided Under Article 226: Telangana High Court Matter To Be Enquired By Bar Council: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Lawyer's PILs With Costs For Suppressing Attorney-Client Relationship BDA Cannot Arbitrarily Reverse Resolutions Passed To Comply With Judicial Directives: Karnataka High Court Section 52A NDPS Act: Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Automatically Vitiate Trial Unless Evidence Is Doubtful: Punjab & Haryana High Court Rethinking Access to Justice: Proposing a Client-Choice Bar-Integrated Model as a Viable Alternative to the LADC System Delhi Police Grants Permission To Advocates To Protest At Jantar Mantar On August 7 Over LADC Concerns Seniority Must Be Determined From Date Of Substantive Appointment, Not Ad-Hoc Service: Allahabad High Court Uncorroborated Testimony Of Drug Inspector Cannot Form Sole Basis For Conviction Under Drugs Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Suppression Of Adverse Facts Strikes At Root Of Equitable Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court Denies Injunction In HUF Property Dispute

Bar Council Of India Seeks Mamata Banerjee's Enrolment Details After Former WB CM Appears In Calcutta HC In Advocate's Robes

18 May 2026 3:38 PM

By: sayum


"Having regard to the constitutional public office held by her during the said period, and without expressing any opinion at this stage on the permissibility or otherwise of such appearance, the Bar Council of India requires the factual status of her enrolment, practice, suspension, if any, and resumption, if any, to be verified from your records."

Bar Council of India (BCI), in a significant communication dated May 14, 2026, has directed the State Bar Council of West Bengal to furnish the enrolment and practice status of Ms. Mamata Banerjee, the former Chief Minister of West Bengal. The apex regulatory body for lawyers took this step following media reports that Ms. Banerjee appeared before the Calcutta High Court wearing advocate's robes and legal attire, including white bands.

BCI Cites Rules On Professional Conduct And Prescribed Dress Code

The BCI noted that the Bar Council of India Rules lay down the standards of professional conduct and etiquette applicable to advocates. Specifically, the Council referred to Part VI, Chapter IV of the BCI Rules, titled "Form of Dresses or Robes to be Worn by Advocates," which mandates the specific attire for advocates appearing before the Supreme Court, High Courts, subordinate courts, and tribunals.

Ms. Mamata Banerjee served as the Chief Minister of West Bengal for fifteen years, from 2011 to 2026. The BCI highlighted that her appearance in legal attire immediately following her tenure in a high constitutional office necessitates a verification of her current entitlement to practice law.

Inquiry Into Status Of Enrolment And Suspension Of Practice During CM Tenure

The BCI has directed the State Bar Council to provide specific details, including Ms. Banerjee’s enrolment number and the date of her enrolment on the State Roll. A critical point of inquiry is whether her name currently continues on the State Roll of Advocates maintained by the West Bengal Bar Council.

Council Investigates Intimation Of Voluntary Suspension

The regulator has further sought information on whether Ms. Banerjee had, at any point during her tenure as Chief Minister, given any intimation regarding the voluntary suspension or cessation of her legal practice. Under Indian law, advocates holding elective or public offices are generally required to suspend their practice.

Verification Of Resumption Of Practice Post-Tenure

The BCI has asked for records regarding any application or intimation for the resumption of practice submitted by the former Chief Minister after her tenure. The Council specifically requested the date such an application was received and whether it was officially accepted or taken on record by the State Bar Council.

Requirement For Contemporaneous Official Records And Certified Copies

The BCI has mandated that the information provided must be based strictly on contemporaneous official records, including the State Roll, enrolment register, and Certificate of Practice records. The Secretary of the State Bar Council is required to certify that the copies provided are true copies of the original records maintained in the ordinary course of business.

Direction To Preserve Original Records Without Alteration

Pending the submission of the reply, the BCI has issued a strict directive that the concerned original records must be preserved in their present form. The Council warned that no alteration, correction, overwriting, interpolation, or reconstruction of any record relating to this subject may be undertaken except in accordance with law and after due intimation to the BCI.

The State Bar Council of West Bengal has been directed to submit its reply within two days, highlighting the urgency the BCI has attached to the matter.

 

Latest Legal News