Landowners Accepting Compensation For Partial Acquisition Cannot Later Seek Entire Property’s Acquisition Under Section 94 RFCTLARR Act: Patna High Court Retrospective Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Must Be Commensurate With Husband's Salary In Respective Years: Madhya Pradesh High Court Injunction Order Paying 'Lip-Service' To Cardinal Tests Without Addressing Allegations Of Fraud Is Unsustainable: Calcutta High Court Land Loser Appointments: Railways Not In Contempt For Requiring Physical Tests & Matriculation Qualifications, Rules Calcutta High Court Mere Presence Or Post-Incident Help Not Sufficient To Prove Common Intention Under Section 34 IPC: Allahabad High Court Election Petition Against Municipal President Maintainable Within 30 Days Of Election Meeting Despite Absence Of Gazette Notification: Madhya Pradesh High Court Husband Cannot Be Convicted For Wife’s Death Merely Because They Lived Under Same Roof Without Proof Of His Presence: Allahabad High Court Prosecution Case Demolished If Physical Layout In IO’s Sketch Map Contradicts Witness Testimony: Calcutta High Court Suppression Of Facts Not Fatal If Not Material To Merits; State Cannot Benefit From Its Own Failure To Implement Orders: Supreme Court Nature Of Property And Limitation In Partition Suits Are Mixed Questions Of Law & Fact, Cannot Be Decided Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Telangana High Court Landlord Residing In Same Building Entitled To Eviction For Nuisance By Tenant's Patrons; No Need To Examine Independent Witnesses: Bombay High Court "Shocking Administrative Apathy": Supreme Court Summons Rajasthan Top Brass Over Failure To Curb Illegal Sand Mining In Chambal Sanctuary CISF Personnel Making Unsubstantiated Sexual Harassment Allegations Against Colleagues Can Be Removed From Service: Delhi High Court Decree On Admission Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC Can Be Based On Statements Made In Criminal Proceedings: Supreme Court Writ Petition Challenging Labour Tribunal Award Maintainable Even Against Privatized Air India: Delhi High Court Bar Council Of India Seeks Mamata Banerjee's Enrolment Details After Former WB CM Appears In Calcutta HC In Advocate's Robes

Bar Council Of India Seeks Mamata Banerjee's Enrolment Details After Former WB CM Appears In Calcutta HC In Advocate's Robes

18 May 2026 3:38 PM

By: sayum


"Having regard to the constitutional public office held by her during the said period, and without expressing any opinion at this stage on the permissibility or otherwise of such appearance, the Bar Council of India requires the factual status of her enrolment, practice, suspension, if any, and resumption, if any, to be verified from your records."

Bar Council of India (BCI), in a significant communication dated May 14, 2026, has directed the State Bar Council of West Bengal to furnish the enrolment and practice status of Ms. Mamata Banerjee, the former Chief Minister of West Bengal. The apex regulatory body for lawyers took this step following media reports that Ms. Banerjee appeared before the Calcutta High Court wearing advocate's robes and legal attire, including white bands.

BCI Cites Rules On Professional Conduct And Prescribed Dress Code

The BCI noted that the Bar Council of India Rules lay down the standards of professional conduct and etiquette applicable to advocates. Specifically, the Council referred to Part VI, Chapter IV of the BCI Rules, titled "Form of Dresses or Robes to be Worn by Advocates," which mandates the specific attire for advocates appearing before the Supreme Court, High Courts, subordinate courts, and tribunals.

Ms. Mamata Banerjee served as the Chief Minister of West Bengal for fifteen years, from 2011 to 2026. The BCI highlighted that her appearance in legal attire immediately following her tenure in a high constitutional office necessitates a verification of her current entitlement to practice law.

Inquiry Into Status Of Enrolment And Suspension Of Practice During CM Tenure

The BCI has directed the State Bar Council to provide specific details, including Ms. Banerjee’s enrolment number and the date of her enrolment on the State Roll. A critical point of inquiry is whether her name currently continues on the State Roll of Advocates maintained by the West Bengal Bar Council.

Council Investigates Intimation Of Voluntary Suspension

The regulator has further sought information on whether Ms. Banerjee had, at any point during her tenure as Chief Minister, given any intimation regarding the voluntary suspension or cessation of her legal practice. Under Indian law, advocates holding elective or public offices are generally required to suspend their practice.

Verification Of Resumption Of Practice Post-Tenure

The BCI has asked for records regarding any application or intimation for the resumption of practice submitted by the former Chief Minister after her tenure. The Council specifically requested the date such an application was received and whether it was officially accepted or taken on record by the State Bar Council.

Requirement For Contemporaneous Official Records And Certified Copies

The BCI has mandated that the information provided must be based strictly on contemporaneous official records, including the State Roll, enrolment register, and Certificate of Practice records. The Secretary of the State Bar Council is required to certify that the copies provided are true copies of the original records maintained in the ordinary course of business.

Direction To Preserve Original Records Without Alteration

Pending the submission of the reply, the BCI has issued a strict directive that the concerned original records must be preserved in their present form. The Council warned that no alteration, correction, overwriting, interpolation, or reconstruction of any record relating to this subject may be undertaken except in accordance with law and after due intimation to the BCI.

The State Bar Council of West Bengal has been directed to submit its reply within two days, highlighting the urgency the BCI has attached to the matter.

 

Latest Legal News