Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Once a Court Declares a Department an Industry Under Section 2(j), State Cannot Raise the Same Objection Again: Gujarat High Court Slams Repetitive Litigation by Irrigation Department “How Could Cheques Issued in 2020 Be Mentioned in a 2019 Contract?”: Delhi High Court Grants Injunction in Forged MOA Case, Slams Prima Facie Fabrication Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC Sole Testimony of Prosecutrix, If Credible, Is Enough to Convict: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Cheque Issued as Security Still Attracts Section 138 NI Act If Liability Exists on Date of Presentation: Himachal Pradesh High Court No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity Law of Limitation Binds All Equally, Including the State: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Review Petition with 5743 Days’ Delay Once Selected, All Are Equals: Allahabad High Court Slams State for Withholding Pay Protection From Later Batches of Ex-Servicemen Constables Non-Compliance With Section 42 of NDPS Act Is Fatal to Prosecution: Punjab & Haryana High Court Acquits Two Accused In 160 Kg Poppy Husk Case Unregistered Agreement Creating Right of Way Inadmissible in Evidence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Summary Decree in Partition Suit Denied: Unequivocal Admissions Absent, Full Trial Necessary: Delhi High Court No Court Can Allow Itself to Be Used as an Instrument of Fraud: Delhi High Court Exposes Forged Writ Petition Filed in Name of Unaware Citizen "Deliberate Wage Splitting to Evade Provident Fund Dues Is Illegal": Bombay High Court Restores PF Authority's 7A Order Against Saket College and Centrum Direct Anti-Suit Injunction in Matrimonial Dispute Set Aside: Calcutta High Court Refuses to Stall UK Divorce Proceedings Filed by Wife

Allahabad High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash FIR in Rape and Forced Conversion Case, Emphasizes Legislative Intent

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Frequent interference in initial stages would undermine legislation’s purpose,” Court Notes

The Allahabad High Court has dismissed a petition seeking to quash an FIR under sections related to rape, criminal intimidation, and unlawful religious conversion. The judgment, delivered by a bench comprising Justices J.J. Munir and Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal, underscores the serious nature of the allegations and the legislative intent behind the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Act, 2021.

The court highlighted the significance of the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Act, 2021, emphasizing its role in addressing societal issues related to forced religious conversions. “The Act of 2021 is a new statute which has been enacted by the legislature to curtail a prevailing malady in society. Frequent interference with prosecutions at the initial stage under the Act would bog down the legislation and fail to achieve its purpose,” the bench noted.

The allegations against the petitioner, Ruksar, and co-accused Abdul Rahman and Irfan alias Chotu, include stalking, rape, and forced conversion to Islam. The complainant alleged that Abdul Rahman had been stalking her since 2022 and had coerced her into a sexual relationship. Subsequently, Irfan alias Chotu also began stalking and allegedly raping the informant. Ruksar, Abdul Rahman’s wife, allegedly pressured the complainant to convert to Islam and marry Irfan.

In rejecting the petition, the court took into account the gravity of the accusations. “Considering the allegations in the FIR and the fact that there is also an attempt to convert the petitioner, which is prohibited under the Act of 2021, we do not think that this is a case where we should interfere with the investigation at all,” the court stated.

The court meticulously examined the legislative framework and the necessity of allowing investigations to proceed unhindered in cases involving serious criminal offenses. The bench reasoned that premature interference would not only obstruct justice but also dilute the effectiveness of the new legislation aimed at curbing forced religious conversions.

Justice J.J. Munir remarked, “Frequent interference with prosecutions at the initial stage under the Act of 2021 would bog down the legislation and fail to achieve its purpose.”

The Allahabad High Court’s decision to dismiss the petition reflects a judicial commitment to upholding the legislative intent behind the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Act, 2021. By allowing the investigation to proceed, the court reinforced the importance of addressing serious societal issues through robust legal mechanisms. This judgment is anticipated to have a significant impact on the enforcement of laws against forced conversions and related offenses.

 

Date of Decision: 5th June 2024

Ruksar vs. State Of UP And 3 Others

Latest Legal News