Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

A Murder of Democracy – Supreme Court Criticizes Chandigarh Mayoral Election Irregularities

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India has taken a significant stance in the case concerning alleged irregularities in the Chandigarh mayoral election. The primary legal point revolves around the conduct of the returning officer, Anil Masih, and the integrity of the electoral process.

The case emerged against the backdrop of the BJP’s victory in the Chandigarh mayoral polls held on January 30, which was marred by allegations of ballot paper tampering. The Congress-AAP alliance accused Anil Masih of tampering with the ballot papers during the counting process. The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) approached the Supreme Court challenging the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s decision, which had earlier denied interim relief and refused to order fresh elections.

The Supreme Court, comprising Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, Justices JB Pardiwala, and Manoj Misra, expressed grave concern over the allegations. The Court noted, “The integrity of the electoral process is a fundamental pillar of democracy, and any interference with it is akin to a murder of democracy.” The Court ordered the preservation of all election records, including the contentious ballot papers and video recordings of the counting process, for a detailed examination.

Justice Chandrachud remarked, “Any form of tampering or undue influence in the election process undermines the will of the people and cannot be tolerated.” The bench also ordered the prosecution of Anil Masih for his alleged role in interfering with the electoral process.

The Supreme Court directed the judicial officer responsible for safeguarding the election records to be provided with security. The Court scheduled a further examination of the ballot papers and video recordings on February 20, 2024, which is crucial for determining the outcome of the case.

Next date : February 20, 2024

KULDEEP KUMAR VS U.T. CHANDIGARH & ORS. 

Latest Legal News