(1)
MADHAV PRASAD AGGARWAL AND ANOTHER Vs.
AXIS BANK LTD. AND ANOTHER .....Respondent D.D
01/07/2019
Facts: The appellants filed a suit, and the respondents sought the rejection of the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11(d) of the CPC, arguing that it disclosed no cause of action. The lower court bifurcated the plaint, and the High Court opined that the suit could continue against the company (defendant No. 1) alone.Issues: Whether it is permissible for the civil court to reject the plaint against speci...
(2)
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, M.I.W. Vs.
VITTHAL DAMODAR PATIL AND ANOTHER .....Respondent D.D
01/07/2019
FACTS:A notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act was issued in 1998 for acquiring land in Maharashtra.The Special Land Acquisition Officer passed an award in 2000, fixing the compensation rates for different types of land.The respondents filed a reference under Section 18 of the Act, challenging the compensation awarded.The Reference Court rejected the valuation report presented by...
(3)
ASIM SHARIFF Vs.
NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY .....Respondent D.D
01/07/2019
Facts:A criminal case was registered for various offenses against the appellant and other accused persons.The appellant filed a discharge application under Section 227 Cr.P.C., claiming lack of material for the case against him.The investigation was entrusted to the National Investigation Agency (NIA), and a charge sheet was submitted.The trial Court dismissed the discharge application, and the Hi...
(4)
ARSHNOOR SINGH Vs.
HARPAL KAUR AND OTHERS .....Respondent D.D
01/07/2019
FACTS:On October 1, 2018, the Central Government filed a petition under Sections 241 and 242 before the Tribunal, alleging mismanagement by the Board of IL&FS.Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) and Registrar of the Companies conducted investigations, revealing mismanagement, financial irregularities, and fraudulent accounting practices.The Tribunal suspended the IL&FS Board and appo...
(5)
THE SILPPI CONSTRUCTIONS CONTRACTORS Vs.
UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER ETC. ETC. .....Respondent
D.D
21/06/2019
Facts:Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 issued notice inviting tenders for two works at Kochi.The petitioner, "The Silppi Constructions Contractors," submitted its bid, which was later rejected based on technical grounds.The petitioner appealed, and when rejected again, filed a writ petition in the High Court challenging the rejection.Issues:Rejection of the technical bid without sufficient reason...
(6)
FOUNDATION FOR ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FORE SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR Vs.
THE ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION THROUGH THE MEMBER SECRETARY .....Respondent D.D
21/06/2019
Facts:The petitioner sought an extension of approval and an increase in seats from the AICTE.While approval for existing seats was granted, the request for increased seats was rejected by the AICTE.Despite lacking permission for additional seats, the petitioner admitted students beyond the sanctioned number.The AICTE imposed a penalty of Rs. 23,10,00,000/- for the excess admissions.Issues:The peti...
(7)
EDUCATION PROMOTION SOCIETY FOR INDIA AND ANOTHER Vs.
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....Respondent D.D
21/06/2019
Facts: The petitioners, representing a society of educational institutions, sought an extension of time for counseling for postgraduate medical courses. The request was based on the existence of a significant number of vacant seats in various colleges and universities.Issues: Whether a general extension of time for counseling should be granted based on the existence of vacant seats without any spe...
(8)
STATE OF HARYANA Vs.
ANGOORI DEVI & ANR. .....Respondent D.D
13/06/2019
Facts:The victim and her sister were married to two brothers.The victim died of burn injuries after 3 years of marriage.Allegations of dowry harassment and demand for money were raised by the complainant (victim's father).The trial court convicted the respondents, but the High Court acquitted them based on weak evidence.Issues:Proximity between the demand for dowry and the act of cruelty or h...
(9)
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. Vs.
MEERA TIWARY & ANR. .....Respondent D.D
11/06/2019
FACTS:Shri Amardeo Tiwari, a government servant, retired on 30.6.1995.Writ petition filed by respondent no.1 for post-retiral benefits.High Court's order on 21.9.2004 directed authorities to redress grievances.Provisional pension and gratuity sanctioned based on Junior Engineer position.Contempt application filed by respondent no.1 alleging non-compliance.ISSUES:Compliance with the High Court...