(1)
NAFE SINGH @ BOBY …APPELLANT Vs.
STATE OF HARYANA …RESPONDENT D.D
10/03/2017
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Law - Conviction for Murder - Direct Evidence vs. Motive – Appellant convicted for murdering his wife by inflicting injuries with a sharp-edged weapon – Appellant argued lack of motive – Court held motive insignificant in the presence of direct evidence – Conviction based on eyewitness testimony and forensic evidence upheld – Appellant’s contention rega...
(2)
RAJ KUMAR @ MOGHLI AND ANOTHER …APPELLANTS Vs.
STATE OF HARYANA …RESPONDENT D.D
09/03/2017
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Law - Conviction for Murder - Evidentiary Basis and Delay in Forensic Examination – Accused-appellants convicted under Sections 302/34 and 506 IPC for attacking the deceased with knives – Delay of 6 months in forensic examination of knives – Held, delay not beneficial to the accused given doctor's opinion that injuries matched knives – Inordinate delay potentia...
(3)
KANWAL PREET SINGH SIDHU AND OTHERS …PETITIONERS Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS D.D
09/03/2017
HIGH COURTS
Constitutional Law - Eligibility for Public Service Appointments – Petitioners, employees of Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (PSPCL), claimed eligibility for PCS (Executive Branch) via Register C – Held, employees of statutory Boards/Corporations do not hold civil posts under the State or Union – Boards/Corporations are distinct entities, even if state-owned and controlled...
(4)
CHHAJU SINGH SULEKH RAM FAMILY TRUST, KHANNA THROUGH ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE, CHHAJU SINGH (DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRs …PETITIONER Vs.
BALJINDER SINGH …RESPONDENT D.D
08/03/2017
HIGH COURTS
Civil Procedure - Amendment of Pleadings - Bona Fide Intention – Petition for amendment of eviction petition and impleadment of Praveen Prakash Kanwal as petitioner No.2 claiming independent landlord status – Held, amendment permissible as long as material pleadings are not altered or substituted and the amendment is bona fide – No mala fide intention found, and amendment necessa...
(5)
RAM CHANDER …PETITIONER Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB …RESPONDENT D.D
06/03/2017
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Law - Parole - Temporary Release of Prisoners – Petitioner, a life convict for murder, denied parole on grounds of potential criminal activity – Held, likelihood of committing crime while on parole is not sufficient to decline parole – Parole can be denied only if release endangers state security or public order – Petitioner does not fall under 'hardcore prison...
(6)
CHUNNI LAL CHAUDHARY …PETITIONER Vs.
RAKESH BAKSHI …RESPONDENT D.D
03/03/2017
HIGH COURTS
Rent Law - Eviction for Bona Fide Requirement - Personal Necessity – Landlord filed ejectment petition for the bona fide requirement of setting up his son – Concurrent findings by lower courts ordering eviction – Petitioner contended that during pendency of the proceedings, landlord’s son had let out another property – Petitioner's application for amendment under ...
(7)
KANWALJIT SINGH BAJWA AND OTHERS …Petitioners Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS …Respondents D.D
03/03/2017
HIGH COURTS
Constitutional Law - Judicial Service - Inter-se Seniority - Quota System - Judicial Review – The petitioners challenged the seniority list dated 24.12.2015 of the Punjab Superior Judicial Service. The primary issue was the inter-se seniority among officers appointed through three sources: promotion from Civil Judges (Senior Division) based on merit-cum-seniority and passing a suitability te...
(8)
NATIONAL FERTILIZER LIMITED …PETITIONER Vs.
DAVINDER LAL BANSAL AND ANOTHER …RESPONDENTS D.D
28/02/2017
HIGH COURTS
Land Acquisition Law - Enhanced Compensation - Equitable Treatment of Landowners – Petitioner contended that respondent landowner, who did not appeal the compensation award, should not receive the enhanced compensation granted to other landowners in similar circumstances – Held, equitable treatment requires similarly situated landowners to receive similar compensation – Supreme C...
(9)
BUDH RAM AND OTHERS …PETITIONERS Vs.
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS D.D
27/02/2017
HIGH COURTS
Land Law - Redetermination of Surplus Area - Suo Moto Powers – Financial Commissioner invoked suo moto powers after 11 years to redetermine surplus area – Held, such invocation not permissible once determination has attained finality up to the High Court – Surplus area vested and mutated in favor of the State, utilized, and not available for redetermination – Arbitrary and ...