(1)
RANJEET KUMAR YADAV ..... Appellant Vs.
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent D.D
14/08/2023
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Appeal - Conviction under Sections 342/363/376 IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act - Victim, a minor, allegedly sexually assaulted by the appellant - Appeal seeks to set aside the conviction and sentence - Various submissions made by the parties - Examination of victim's testimony, medical evidence, and corroborating statements - Analysis of inconsistencies in victim's statements -...
(2)
Shiv Prasad Bhagat ..… Petitioner Vs.
State of Odisha &Ors. ….. Opp. Parties D.D
14/08/2023
HIGH COURTS
Writ Petition - Challenge to Rejection of Representation for Reopening of IMFL "ON" Shop - Petitioner sought quashing of orders rejecting representation and a direction to grant permit for reopening - Shop had been closed due to Supreme Court's ban on liquor sale along highways.
Apex Court's Relaxations - Subsequent orders by Supreme Court provided relaxations based on proximi...
(3)
RELIANCE INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Vs.
MADHYANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED ..... Respondent D.D
14/08/2023
HIGH COURTS
Civil Jurisdiction - Territorial Jurisdiction - Arbitration Agreement - Interpretation of seat of arbitration - Dispute over territorial jurisdiction - Whether the court has territorial jurisdiction to entertain the present petition - Examination of arbitration agreement's clauses - Determination of the "seat" of arbitration - Analysis of relevant precedents regarding seat of arbitra...
(4)
PARAMJEET SINGH … Petitioner Vs.
PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. AND ANR. ... Respondents D.D
14/08/2023
HIGH COURTS
Compensation Policy – Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. – Introduction of a comprehensive policy by respondents/PSPCL for compensation in cases of fatal/non-fatal injuries/deaths due to electrocution – Application to employees (regular and contractual) and private persons (including minors and adults) – Details of compensation under various scenarios provided. [Para 8]
...
(5)
MAHADEV S/O. SHIVAPPA NAVARA .....Petitioner Vs.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH .....Respondent D.D
11/08/2023
HIGH COURTS
Facts: The petitioner sought to quash an order allowing the recall of PW5 for cross-examination through video conferencing in a criminal case where he was accused of abusing a Judicial Officer. [Para 4]
Issues: The issues were related to the legality of the trial Court's decision to recall PW5 for cross-examination through video conferencing and whether the accused's rights were a...
(6)
NAVEEN AND OTHERS Vs.
STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS D.D
11/08/2023
HIGH COURTS
Facts:
The accused were charged with the murder of Shihab, allegedly committed using an Ambassador car (MO11) and a motorcycle (MO13). The prosecution claimed that the accused were members of the organization RSS and had targeted Shihab, who was the prime accused in the murder of an RSS member. The case was built on the evidence of two witnesses (PW1 and PW2) and the seizure of the vehicles. Th...
(7)
Mr. Vijay Choudhary, And Others .......Petitioner Vs.
1) State Of Maharashtra High Court Bombay. And Others ....Respondent D.D
11/08/2023
HIGH COURTS
Facts - Police investigation in the present case recorded statements of Mr. Tanveer Khan and Mr. Nirmal Paul, witnesses mentioned by Respondent No.2 in her FIR. The witnesses did not support Respondent No.2's allegations.
- Respondent No.2 falsely claimed that the company, Max Life Insurance, did not take cognizance of her complaints, even though an inquiry was conducted into them.
- The...
(8)
DEVENDER GOVIND RAM RAVIN ..... Appellant Vs.
REKHA ..... Respondent D.D
11/08/2023
HIGH COURTS
Marriage and Separation – Marriage between parties and subsequent separation; allegations of relationships outside marriage during proceedings. [Para 1-7, 24-27]
Cruelty – Allegations and substantiation of cruelty; Supreme Court's observations; false complaints constituting mental cruelty. [Para 12-13, 19-23]
Desertion – Evidence of long separation without cogent reason...
(9)
Smriti Singh And 5 Others ……… Petitioner Vs.
State of U.P. and Another ………… Respondent D.D
11/08/2023
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Appeal – Summoning Order – Matrimonial Dispute – Allegations of assault, abuse, and threats – Present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution against the impugned summoning order – Petitioners (accused) challenge the legality and propriety of the summoning order – Court examines the facts and submissions of both parties. [Para 1]
...