Civil Procedure – Rejection of Plaint – Order 7 Rule 11 CPC – Plaintiffs sought declaration that earlier decrees up to Supreme Court were null and void – Defendants filed application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC contending plaint disclosed no cause of action and suit barred by law – Trial court directed defendants to file written statement without deciding the applicatio...
Society Commission – Deletion and Substitution of Rule – Rule 49 of U.P. Sugarcane Rules – Substituted Rule Ceasing to Operate – Revival of Old Rule – Not Permissible – The appellants challenged the demand of society commission at 5% of the minimum statutory price of sugarcane on the ground that old Rule 49 was deleted and substituted by a new Rule 49 prescribin...
Land Acquisition – Reference under Section 18 – Rejection by Reference Court Reversed – Compensation Enhanced – The appellant challenged the rejection of a reference filed under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on the ground that it was time-barred and also questioned the compensation determined by the Collector at ₹479.15 per acre – The High Court...
Tenancy Law - Rent Control Act – Executability of Eviction Decree – Multinational Company Sub-lessee – Jurisdiction Upheld – The petitioner, a multinational company, challenged the execution of eviction decrees on the ground that premises were exempt under Section 3(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 – Held: The exemption is qua the premises let or sub-le...
Acquisition Law - BDA Acquisition – Applicability of L.A. Act Section 11A/Section 6 – Not Applicable – The appellant sought to quash BDA acquisition contending that the award passed beyond Section 11A’s period caused lapse – Held: BDA Act is a special, self-contained code for planned development (List II Entry 5); it provides its own scheme for declaration (Section 19...
Electricity Act - Tariff Determination – Section 26 A.P. Electricity Reforms Act – Brief of Judgment – Annual tariff for 01.04.2000–31.03.2001 upheld by High Court – Before the Supreme Court, appellants urged that Section 26(9) procedure must be followed for tariff fixation and that Section 26(7) forbids classification/undue preference – Held: Annual tariff is d...
Article 30(1) – Minority Educational Institutions – Reference to Larger Bench – Eleven-Judge Bench – Questions Reframed – The Court, after hearing parties, reformulated comprehensive questions on (i) who are “minorities” and the unit for determination, (ii) scope of the right to establish and administer, including admissions/selection procedures in aided a...
Constitution Bench reference - Binding Precedent – Larger Bench vs Smaller Bench – Article 141 – Two-Judge Bench cannot take a view contrary to a prior Three-Judge Bench – The Court traced earlier PMS doctors’ litigation: Allahabad High Court and a Three-Judge Bench (24.11.1992) upheld counting seniority of temporary doctors from initial appointment – Later Two-...
Motor Vehicles Permits – Liberalised Policy – Section 80 & 80(2) – High Court Orders Set Aside; STAT Orders Restored – Appellants’ mini-bus permits were stalled by relying on a State Scheme ratio and by remitting matters despite Section 80’s mandate – Held: Section 80(2) obliges authorities to “ordinarily” grant permits; attempts ...
Planning Control – Sections 46, 53, 54, 56 & 137, 1979 Act – Appeal Dismissed – The appellant constructed a second floor over an existing hotel building at Digha relying on an earlier Gram Panchayat sanction – After constitution of the Digha Planning Authority and interim guidelines under Section 56, notices under Sections 54 and 53(1) were issued to stop and demolish u...