Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |     Disproportionate Fine Cannot Be Imposed for Recovery of 1 Liter of Country-made Liquor: Patna High Court    |     Prosecution failed to prove identity of remains and establish murder beyond reasonable doubt: Orissa High Court Acquit Ex-Husband    |     Despite 12 Injuries on the Victim, No Intention to Kill Found: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC    |     Governor’s sanction suffers from non-application of mind: Karnataka High Court Stays Governor’s Sanction for Investigation Against CM Siddaramaiah    |    

Unilateral Cancellation of Gift Deed Liable to Be Declared as Null and Void: Madras High Court"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Madurai, Oct 20, 2023 - The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court today declared that unilateral cancellations of gift deeds are "liable to be declared as null and void," setting a legal precedent that could have far-reaching implications.

In a common order presided over by the Honorable Mr. Justice B.Pugazhendi, the court addressed multiple writ petitions pertaining to the controversial cancellation of a gift deed concerning lands belonging to M/s. Shar Theme Park, a private company. These lands, situated in Kambarasampettai Village in Trichy District, were initially gifted to the Kambarasampettai Panchayat for the purpose of open space reservations, parks, and roads.

Justice Pugazhendi stated, "This unilateral deed of cancellation is liable to be declared as null and void." He further relied on the ratio laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in Sasikala v. Revenue Divisional Officer, emphasizing that the revocation should be with the assent of the donee and cannot be at the mere will of the donor.

The court also addressed other writ petitions including WP(MD)No.7814 of 2016 and WP(MD)No.4936 of 2017, which were both dismissed as withdrawn.

Legal experts say this judgment is significant as it upholds the integrity and sanctity of gift deeds, ensuring that they cannot be unilaterally revoked without due legal process.

Mr. J.John, representing the petitioner, hailed the court's judgment as a "significant step forward in safeguarding the legal sanctity of gift deeds."

The judgment is expected to have wider implications on property law, ensuring that once gifted, a property can't be whimsically taken back without legal justification. It serves as a warning to those who might attempt to abuse the legal instruments like gift deeds for fraudulent purposes.

Date of Decision: 20.10.2023

NVS.Anandan  vs The Tahsildar, Srirangam Taluk, Tiruchirappalli.   

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/20_October_2023-Nvs_Anandan_vs_The_Tahsildar.pdf"]

Similar News