Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court 'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Unilateral Cancellation of Gift Deed Liable to Be Declared as Null and Void: Madras High Court"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Madurai, Oct 20, 2023 - The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court today declared that unilateral cancellations of gift deeds are "liable to be declared as null and void," setting a legal precedent that could have far-reaching implications.

In a common order presided over by the Honorable Mr. Justice B.Pugazhendi, the court addressed multiple writ petitions pertaining to the controversial cancellation of a gift deed concerning lands belonging to M/s. Shar Theme Park, a private company. These lands, situated in Kambarasampettai Village in Trichy District, were initially gifted to the Kambarasampettai Panchayat for the purpose of open space reservations, parks, and roads.

Justice Pugazhendi stated, "This unilateral deed of cancellation is liable to be declared as null and void." He further relied on the ratio laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in Sasikala v. Revenue Divisional Officer, emphasizing that the revocation should be with the assent of the donee and cannot be at the mere will of the donor.

The court also addressed other writ petitions including WP(MD)No.7814 of 2016 and WP(MD)No.4936 of 2017, which were both dismissed as withdrawn.

Legal experts say this judgment is significant as it upholds the integrity and sanctity of gift deeds, ensuring that they cannot be unilaterally revoked without due legal process.

Mr. J.John, representing the petitioner, hailed the court's judgment as a "significant step forward in safeguarding the legal sanctity of gift deeds."

The judgment is expected to have wider implications on property law, ensuring that once gifted, a property can't be whimsically taken back without legal justification. It serves as a warning to those who might attempt to abuse the legal instruments like gift deeds for fraudulent purposes.

Date of Decision: 20.10.2023

NVS.Anandan  vs The Tahsildar, Srirangam Taluk, Tiruchirappalli.   

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/20_October_2023-Nvs_Anandan_vs_The_Tahsildar.pdf"]

Latest Legal News