Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court’s Order, Remits Rosewood Seizure Case for Reexamination

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent verdict, the Supreme Court of India has set aside the order passed by the High Court of Kerala, which directed the release of illicitly seized rosewood logs and a lorry. The judgment, delivered by Justice Rajesh Bindal and Justice Abhay S. Oka, emphasized the importance of disclosing post-seizure developments to the court.

“The matter does not require examination in detail by this Court at this stage, for the reason that neither the lorry nor the rosewood logs are available as both have been sold by the state,” observed Justice Bindal in the verdict.

The case revolved around the seizure of a lorry carrying rosewood logs, found beneath bananas and rice husk. The seized material was declared government property, and after a series of legal proceedings, the High Court ordered the return of the logs and the lorry. However, the appellant raised concerns over the ownership and legality of the seizure, pointing out that the logs were improperly transported state property.

In the judgment, the court highlighted the failure of the appellant to inform the High Court about the post-seizure developments, including the sale of the logs and the lorry. The court stated that the “lapse on the part of the state to apprise the High Court of the true and up-to-date facts at the time of final hearing” had a significant impact on the case.

Consequently, the Supreme Court remitted the matter back to the High Court for reexamination, allowing the respondents the possibility of receiving the amount collected from the sale of the logs and the lorry. The High Court was also directed to consider awarding interest on the amount collected.

While disposing of the appeal, the bench observed, “The appeal is disposed off accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.”

The verdict sheds light on the importance of presenting accurate and up-to-date information to the court throughout the legal process, ensuring the fair and just resolution of cases involving seized property.

Date of Decision: August 09, 2023.

ASSISTANT WILD LIFE WARDEN & ANR. K. MOIDEEN & ANR.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/09-Aug-2023-SC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News