Where Medical Evidence Creates Reasonable Doubt, Benefit Must Go To The Accused: Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Murder Conviction Lok Adalat Award Cannot Override Registered Lease Deed: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Execution Petition for Eviction Deemed Conveyance Does Not Enlarge Title — Civil Court Must Adjudicate Ownership Disputes: Bombay High Court Common Intention Must Be Proved—No One Can Be Convicted Solely for Being Named Among a Group: Calcutta High Court Mere Abusive Language or Threat, Without Sexual Colour, Does Not Attract Section 354A IPC: Delhi High Court Forcing a Child to Carry the Trauma Is an Assault on Dignity: Gujarat High Court Allows Termination of 15-Week Pregnancy of 14-Year-Old Rape Survivor Framing of Charge is Not a Final Order, No Appeal Lies Under Section 14A of SC/ST Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Interest Earned from Axis Bank Is ‘Attributable’ to Credit Business – Not a Separate Source of Income: ITAT Chennai Grants 80P Deduction Must Be Proved, Not May Be Proved: Karnataka High Court Upholds Triple Murder Conviction On Complete Chain Of Circumstantial Evidence Statutory Scheme Overrides Hereditary Claims: Kerala High Court Upholds Executive Officer Appointment at Malamakkavu Ayyappa Temple No Mid-Stream Change In Examination Centre Once Exams Are Underway:  Orissa High Court Draws Line On Judicial Interference Forest Allegation Found Baseless, Petitioner Had Personal Grudge: NGT Dismisses Plea Alleging Illegal Mining in Raisen Protected Forest CPC Has No Role in Consumer Forums: National Commission Slams Procedural Missteps in Insurance Complaint Transfer Case Permit Is Not a Formality, It’s a Legal Necessity: Madhya Pradesh High Court Directs Insurer to ‘Pay and Recover’ for Accident Caused by Vehicle Plying Outside Authorized States A Compromise Before Court Is Not a Private Contract but a Solemn Undertaking: Punjab & Haryana High Court Cancels Anticipatory Bail Senior Citizens Misled with FD Promises Can’t Be Bound by Insurance Contracts: Chandigarh State Commission Upholds Full Refund with Interest No Specific Forum Under Trust Act to Adjudicate Election Disputes Involving Fraud: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Civil Court Jurisdiction Mere Presence is Not Conspiracy: Kerala High Court Grants Bail in Ganja Case Where Intermediate Quantity Alone Recovered from Accused Sufficient Cause Is Not a Matter of Sympathy, But Substance: Bombay High Court Rejects 645-Day Delay in Filing Review Petition

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court’s Order, Remits Rosewood Seizure Case for Reexamination

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent verdict, the Supreme Court of India has set aside the order passed by the High Court of Kerala, which directed the release of illicitly seized rosewood logs and a lorry. The judgment, delivered by Justice Rajesh Bindal and Justice Abhay S. Oka, emphasized the importance of disclosing post-seizure developments to the court.

“The matter does not require examination in detail by this Court at this stage, for the reason that neither the lorry nor the rosewood logs are available as both have been sold by the state,” observed Justice Bindal in the verdict.

The case revolved around the seizure of a lorry carrying rosewood logs, found beneath bananas and rice husk. The seized material was declared government property, and after a series of legal proceedings, the High Court ordered the return of the logs and the lorry. However, the appellant raised concerns over the ownership and legality of the seizure, pointing out that the logs were improperly transported state property.

In the judgment, the court highlighted the failure of the appellant to inform the High Court about the post-seizure developments, including the sale of the logs and the lorry. The court stated that the “lapse on the part of the state to apprise the High Court of the true and up-to-date facts at the time of final hearing” had a significant impact on the case.

Consequently, the Supreme Court remitted the matter back to the High Court for reexamination, allowing the respondents the possibility of receiving the amount collected from the sale of the logs and the lorry. The High Court was also directed to consider awarding interest on the amount collected.

While disposing of the appeal, the bench observed, “The appeal is disposed off accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.”

The verdict sheds light on the importance of presenting accurate and up-to-date information to the court throughout the legal process, ensuring the fair and just resolution of cases involving seized property.

Date of Decision: August 09, 2023.

ASSISTANT WILD LIFE WARDEN & ANR. K. MOIDEEN & ANR.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/09-Aug-2023-SC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News