MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Strict Adherence to By-laws Essential for Urban Safety in Stray Cattle Management ,Rules High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


High Court directs Punjab, Haryana, and Chandigarh to enforce stringent measures to mitigate stray cattle menace.

In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has directed the states of Punjab, Haryana, and the Union Territory of Chandigarh to enforce stringent by-laws for the management of stray cattle. The decision, issued by a bench comprising Acting Chief Justice G.S. Sandhawalia and Justice Vikas Bahl, emphasized the importance of these measures to ensure public safety and mitigate the risks associated with stray cattle in urban areas.

The case arose from two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners sought directives for the construction and management of cattle pounds in Punjab, Haryana, and Chandigarh to address the increasing menace of stray cattle. The PIL highlighted the need for comprehensive infrastructure to confine stray animals and prevent accidents and injuries caused by them.The court meticulously examined the affidavits and status reports submitted by the states and UT, detailing measures taken to address the issue. The State of Punjab reported the existence of 457 Gaushalas (cattle pounds) receiving substantial financial assistance. Haryana and Chandigarh also provided details on fines imposed, cattle impoundment statistics, and vaccination programs. The court acknowledged these efforts and advised the states to consider adopting uniform by-laws to enhance efficacy in handling stray cattle issues.

“Once the Rules and By-laws have been made applicable in urban areas, the relief sought has been reasonably redressed,” the court noted. It stressed that the purpose of the PILs had been fulfilled, provided the states ensure strict adherence to the by-laws and undertake regular exercises to pick up stray cattle from urban areas.

The judgment emphasized the necessity of proactive measures by urban local bodies to mitigate the risks posed by stray cattle. “On account of heavy vehicular traffic flow in urban areas, the menace of stray cattle, whether moving or stationary, can lead to injuries and accidents, sometimes proving fatal,” the court observed. It highlighted the importance of sensitivity in executing these measures, considering the potential for serious accidents involving stray cattle.

Justice Sandhawalia remarked, “The State shall ensure that the exercise of picking up stray cattle is done with proper sensitivity, as the menace of stray cattle can lead to injuries and accidents, sometimes proving fatal to pedestrians and drivers.”

The High Court’s directive mandates strict enforcement of existing by-laws and encourages states to adopt best practices from other jurisdictions to create a uniform framework for managing stray cattle. This landmark decision aims to enhance urban safety and underscores the judiciary’s commitment to addressing public interest concerns through effective legal measures. The ruling is expected to have a far-reaching impact on urban management and public safety protocols concerning stray cattle.

 

Date of Decision: 03.07.2024

Jatinder Jain   VS State of Haryana and others

Latest Legal News