Bail | Right to Speedy Trial is a Fundamental Right Under Article 21: PH High Court    |     Postal Department’s Power to Enhance Penalties Time-Barred, Rules Allahabad High Court    |     Tenants Cannot Cross-Examine Landlords Unless Relationship is Disputed: Madras High Court    |     NDPS | Conscious Possession Extends to Vehicle Drivers: Telangana High Court Upholds 10-Year Sentence in Ganja Trafficking Case    |     Aid Reduction Of Without Due Process Unlawful: Rajasthan High Court Restores Full Grants for Educational Institutions    |     Assessment of Notional Income in Absence of Proof Cannot Be 'Mathematically Precise,' Says Patna High Court    |     NCLT's Resolution Plan Overrides State Tax Claims: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Demands Against Patanjali Foods    |     An Agreement is Not Voidable if the Party Could Discover the Truth with Ordinary Diligence: Calcutta High Court Quashes Termination of LPG Distributorship License    |     Independent Witnesses Contradict Prosecution's Story: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquit Accused in Arson Case    |     Merely Being a Joint Account Holder Does Not Attract Liability Under Section 138 of NI Act:  Gujarat High Court    |     Higher Court Cannot Reappreciate Evidence Unless Perversity is Found: Himachal Pradesh High Court Refused to Enhance Maintenance    |     Perpetual Lease Allows Division of Property: Delhi High Court Affirms Partition and Validity of Purdah Wall    |     "Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Videography in Temple Premises Limited to Religious Functions: Kerala High Court Orders to Restrict Non-Religious Activities on Temple Premises    |     Past Service Must Be Counted for Pension Benefits: Jharkhand High Court Affirms Pension Rights for Daily Wage Employees    |     'Beyond Reasonable Doubt’ Does Not Mean Beyond All Doubt: Madras High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Man Convicted of Murdering Mother-in-Law    |    

Strict Adherence to By-laws Essential for Urban Safety in Stray Cattle Management ,Rules High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


High Court directs Punjab, Haryana, and Chandigarh to enforce stringent measures to mitigate stray cattle menace.

In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has directed the states of Punjab, Haryana, and the Union Territory of Chandigarh to enforce stringent by-laws for the management of stray cattle. The decision, issued by a bench comprising Acting Chief Justice G.S. Sandhawalia and Justice Vikas Bahl, emphasized the importance of these measures to ensure public safety and mitigate the risks associated with stray cattle in urban areas.

The case arose from two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners sought directives for the construction and management of cattle pounds in Punjab, Haryana, and Chandigarh to address the increasing menace of stray cattle. The PIL highlighted the need for comprehensive infrastructure to confine stray animals and prevent accidents and injuries caused by them.The court meticulously examined the affidavits and status reports submitted by the states and UT, detailing measures taken to address the issue. The State of Punjab reported the existence of 457 Gaushalas (cattle pounds) receiving substantial financial assistance. Haryana and Chandigarh also provided details on fines imposed, cattle impoundment statistics, and vaccination programs. The court acknowledged these efforts and advised the states to consider adopting uniform by-laws to enhance efficacy in handling stray cattle issues.

“Once the Rules and By-laws have been made applicable in urban areas, the relief sought has been reasonably redressed,” the court noted. It stressed that the purpose of the PILs had been fulfilled, provided the states ensure strict adherence to the by-laws and undertake regular exercises to pick up stray cattle from urban areas.

The judgment emphasized the necessity of proactive measures by urban local bodies to mitigate the risks posed by stray cattle. “On account of heavy vehicular traffic flow in urban areas, the menace of stray cattle, whether moving or stationary, can lead to injuries and accidents, sometimes proving fatal,” the court observed. It highlighted the importance of sensitivity in executing these measures, considering the potential for serious accidents involving stray cattle.

Justice Sandhawalia remarked, “The State shall ensure that the exercise of picking up stray cattle is done with proper sensitivity, as the menace of stray cattle can lead to injuries and accidents, sometimes proving fatal to pedestrians and drivers.”

The High Court’s directive mandates strict enforcement of existing by-laws and encourages states to adopt best practices from other jurisdictions to create a uniform framework for managing stray cattle. This landmark decision aims to enhance urban safety and underscores the judiciary’s commitment to addressing public interest concerns through effective legal measures. The ruling is expected to have a far-reaching impact on urban management and public safety protocols concerning stray cattle.

 

Date of Decision: 03.07.2024

Jatinder Jain   VS State of Haryana and others

Similar News