Sale Deed Invalid After Revocation of Power of Attorney: Madras High Court Supreme Court Declares WhatsApp Service of Notices Invalid Under Notices under Section 41-A CrPC/Section 35 BNSS Doctrine of Natural Justice Cannot Be Invoked to Evade Regulatory Compliance: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Petition Against Consumer Forum Order Presence of Metallic Foreign Bodies in X-ray Corroborates Firearm Injury" – Patna High Court School Records Alone Insufficient to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Without Corroboration: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Double Payment for the Same Claim Is Against Public Policy: Karnatka High Court Remits Case to Commercial Court Land Acquisition | Once the Government Funds an Acquisition, Public Purpose Cannot Be Disputed: Bombay High Court When a Man Acts in the Heat of the Moment, Law Must Recognize the Loss of Self-Control: KERALA HIGH COURT Absence of Bank Seal on Cheque Return Memo Not a Ground for Acquittal: Calcutta High Court Convicts Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Confiscation is Not Automatic: Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Release of Seized Vehicle in NDPS Case False Allegations in Matrimonial Disputes Can Constitute Mental Cruelty Justifying Divorce: Gujarat High Court Bail Cannot Be Granted in Cases of Commercial Drug Trafficking: Delhi High Court Rejects Bail Plea of Alleged International Drug Cartel Member Magistrate Can Rely on Victim’s Section 164 Statement Over Section 161 Statement: Allahabad High Court Upholds Closure Report in Kidnapping and Rape Case State Liable for Electrocution Injury to Minor Due to Uncovered High-Voltage Wire: J&K and Ladakh High Court Unexplained Delay of 586 Days in Filing Appeal Cannot Be Condoned as a Matter of Right: Supreme Court Sets Aside Karnataka High Court’s Order A Purchaser During Litigation Cannot Claim Superior Rights Over a Decree-Holder: Supreme Court Upholds Doctrine of Lis Pendens Violation of Natural Justice at the Initial Stage Cannot Be Cured at the Appellate Stage: Supreme Court Denial of Fair Hearing Strikes at the Very Core of Justice: Supreme Court Upholds Selection of Shiksha Karmis Merit Alone Must Prevail: Supreme Court Strikes Down Residence-Based Quota in PG Medical Courses Selective Prosecution and Missing Witnesses: Supreme Court Slams Conviction Based on Incomplete Evidence Conviction Cannot Rest on Unreliable Eyewitnesses and Mere Recovery of Weapon: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Accused Need for Legal Recognition of Live-in Relationships:  Rajasthan High Court Calls for Mandatory Registration Judicial Discipline Demands Uniformity: Rajasthan High Court Refers Protection of Married Persons in Live-in Relationships to Special Bench

Strict Adherence to By-laws Essential for Urban Safety in Stray Cattle Management ,Rules High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


High Court directs Punjab, Haryana, and Chandigarh to enforce stringent measures to mitigate stray cattle menace.

In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has directed the states of Punjab, Haryana, and the Union Territory of Chandigarh to enforce stringent by-laws for the management of stray cattle. The decision, issued by a bench comprising Acting Chief Justice G.S. Sandhawalia and Justice Vikas Bahl, emphasized the importance of these measures to ensure public safety and mitigate the risks associated with stray cattle in urban areas.

The case arose from two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners sought directives for the construction and management of cattle pounds in Punjab, Haryana, and Chandigarh to address the increasing menace of stray cattle. The PIL highlighted the need for comprehensive infrastructure to confine stray animals and prevent accidents and injuries caused by them.The court meticulously examined the affidavits and status reports submitted by the states and UT, detailing measures taken to address the issue. The State of Punjab reported the existence of 457 Gaushalas (cattle pounds) receiving substantial financial assistance. Haryana and Chandigarh also provided details on fines imposed, cattle impoundment statistics, and vaccination programs. The court acknowledged these efforts and advised the states to consider adopting uniform by-laws to enhance efficacy in handling stray cattle issues.

“Once the Rules and By-laws have been made applicable in urban areas, the relief sought has been reasonably redressed,” the court noted. It stressed that the purpose of the PILs had been fulfilled, provided the states ensure strict adherence to the by-laws and undertake regular exercises to pick up stray cattle from urban areas.

The judgment emphasized the necessity of proactive measures by urban local bodies to mitigate the risks posed by stray cattle. “On account of heavy vehicular traffic flow in urban areas, the menace of stray cattle, whether moving or stationary, can lead to injuries and accidents, sometimes proving fatal,” the court observed. It highlighted the importance of sensitivity in executing these measures, considering the potential for serious accidents involving stray cattle.

Justice Sandhawalia remarked, “The State shall ensure that the exercise of picking up stray cattle is done with proper sensitivity, as the menace of stray cattle can lead to injuries and accidents, sometimes proving fatal to pedestrians and drivers.”

The High Court’s directive mandates strict enforcement of existing by-laws and encourages states to adopt best practices from other jurisdictions to create a uniform framework for managing stray cattle. This landmark decision aims to enhance urban safety and underscores the judiciary’s commitment to addressing public interest concerns through effective legal measures. The ruling is expected to have a far-reaching impact on urban management and public safety protocols concerning stray cattle.

 

Date of Decision: 03.07.2024

Jatinder Jain   VS State of Haryana and others

Similar News