CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Statutory Appeal 'Rendered Infructuous: Petitioner's Remedy Lies in Challenging Reallotments: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana declared that a statutory appeal against the rescission of auction proceedings for disputed lands has been "rendered infructuous". The case revolves around the petitioner, Manjit Singh Sran, who contested the re-auctioning of lands after his initial successful bid was rescinded.

Justice Sureshwar Thakur, in his oral observations, emphasized that the petitioner has the option to seek remedy by making a "lawful challenge to the reallotments of lands to one Veerpal Singh". Veerpal Singh had emerged as the highest successful bidder in the re-auctioning, which was carried out as per government instructions following an objection.

The genesis of the case dates back to the auction of disputed lands, wherein the petitioner claimed to be the successful bidder. However, the auction was later rescinded in favor of a higher bid. The petitioner sought a mandamus for a prompt decision on his statutory appeal against the decision, which the Court found was rendered infructuous due to the subsequent re-auctioning and leasing of the lands.

Justice Thakur observed that "though this Court, through verdict made upon the writ petition, had permitted the petitioner to raise a statutory appeal against Annexures P-8 and P-9, but no direction was made... that till the preferment of the said appeal, the respondent concerned may not draw any further auction proceedings in respect of the petition lands."

Highlighting the course of action for the petitioner, the Court directed that "the amounts deposited by the petitioner be released, in accordance with law", subject to an application being presented to the competent authority.

This decision sheds light on the nuances of auction proceedings and the legal recourse available to aggrieved parties, underlining the importance of timely challenges and appeals in such matters.

 Date of Decision: 16 October  2023

MANJIT SINGH SRAN VS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/PH-16_October_2023-Manjit_Singh_Sran_vs_State_Of_Punjab_And_Others.pdf"]

Latest Legal News