Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Statutory Appeal 'Rendered Infructuous: Petitioner's Remedy Lies in Challenging Reallotments: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana declared that a statutory appeal against the rescission of auction proceedings for disputed lands has been "rendered infructuous". The case revolves around the petitioner, Manjit Singh Sran, who contested the re-auctioning of lands after his initial successful bid was rescinded.

Justice Sureshwar Thakur, in his oral observations, emphasized that the petitioner has the option to seek remedy by making a "lawful challenge to the reallotments of lands to one Veerpal Singh". Veerpal Singh had emerged as the highest successful bidder in the re-auctioning, which was carried out as per government instructions following an objection.

The genesis of the case dates back to the auction of disputed lands, wherein the petitioner claimed to be the successful bidder. However, the auction was later rescinded in favor of a higher bid. The petitioner sought a mandamus for a prompt decision on his statutory appeal against the decision, which the Court found was rendered infructuous due to the subsequent re-auctioning and leasing of the lands.

Justice Thakur observed that "though this Court, through verdict made upon the writ petition, had permitted the petitioner to raise a statutory appeal against Annexures P-8 and P-9, but no direction was made... that till the preferment of the said appeal, the respondent concerned may not draw any further auction proceedings in respect of the petition lands."

Highlighting the course of action for the petitioner, the Court directed that "the amounts deposited by the petitioner be released, in accordance with law", subject to an application being presented to the competent authority.

This decision sheds light on the nuances of auction proceedings and the legal recourse available to aggrieved parties, underlining the importance of timely challenges and appeals in such matters.

 Date of Decision: 16 October  2023

MANJIT SINGH SRAN VS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/PH-16_October_2023-Manjit_Singh_Sran_vs_State_Of_Punjab_And_Others.pdf"]

Latest Legal News