Criminal Proceedings Cannot Be Used To Settle Civil Property Disputes: Calcutta High Court Quashes Trespass And Theft Case Victim’s Absence From WhatsApp Group Does Not Negate Insult To Modesty: Kerala High Court Refuses To Quash Case Over Obscene Posts Section 319 CrPC | Summoning Additional Accused Requires Evidence Stronger Than Prima Facie: Allahabad High Court Employer Cannot Plead Limitation When It Failed To Determine Gratuity: Bombay High Court On Employer’s Statutory Duty Under Section 7 Once Demand and Acceptance Are Proved, Burden Shifts to Accused: Delhi High Court Affirms Conviction of Police Officer in Bribery Case BUDS Act | Law Looks At The Substance Of The Transaction, Not Its Cosmetic Garb: Karnataka High Court Refuses To Quash FIR Against Digital Gold Platform Under Seniority Tied to Appointment, Not Selection: Delhi High Court Full Bench Resolves Long-standing Conflict in BSF Recruitment Seniority Disputes Calling Family Land "Ancestral" Is Not Enough — Must Trace Four Generations Of Male Lineage To Stop Father From Selling It: Punjab & Haryana HC Cannot Challenge a Document Bearing Your Own Signature By Staying Out of the Witness Box: Punjab & Haryana HC Dismisses Injunction Suit Solar Panel Installation Does Not Amount To Industrial Use, SIPCOT Can Resume Unutilised Land: Madras High Court Article 226 Is Not A Forum To Settle Boundary Wars: Kerala High Court Refuses To Entertain Plea For Retaining Wall In Munnar Landslide Dispute State Cannot Exploit A Workman For 30 Years And Deny Him Pension: Orissa High Court Orders Notional Regularisation Of DLR Watchman Wrote "Main Chor Hoon" On It With A Marker — And A Man Died: Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail Equivalency Cannot Override Statutory Mandate of Regular Study: Kerala High Court Sets Aside KAT Order on Librarian Recruitment No Saptapadi, No Marriage: Calcutta High Court Quashes Bigamy And Cruelty Case, Rules Stamp Paper Union Is Legal Nullity Under Hindu Marriage Act Revenue Authority Cannot Vest Land In State Under Section 79A, Suo Motu Proceedings After 11 Years Fatal: Gujarat High Court Campaigning During 48-Hour Silent Period Is Not 'Undue Influence' Under Section 123(2), Election Petition Must Plead How Result Was Materially Affected: Bombay High Court DVDs Carrying Encoded Data Infringe Patent Even If Stampers Are Outsourced: Delhi High Court in Philips’ DVD-ROM Patent Dispute Departmental Exoneration Does Not Bar Criminal Trial If Key Evidence Not Considered: Karnataka HC Refuses To Quash PSI’s Corruption Case Can't Claim Irrevocable License Under Section 60 Easements Act Without Pleading It First: Punjab & Haryana High Court Gurmeet Ram Rahim Acquitted in Journalist Murder Case, But Three Co-Accused Convicted: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Actual Shooters FSL Ballistic Evidence Cannot Be Discredited Years After Trial Merely Because Bullets Bear Different Seals: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Section 37 of NDPS Can Be Diluted in View of Salutary Provisions of Article 21 Which Provides For The Right To A Speedy Trial: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Punjab & Haryana High Court, in a judgment delivered on November 21, 2023, granted bail to the accused, Balwinder Kumar, who was facing charges under Section 22/61/85 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The case pertained to the recovery of contraband substances.

The High Court’s decision to grant bail was based on a careful examination of the circumstances, which included the alleged non-compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of the NDPS Act. The petitioner, through his counsel, had vehemently claimed that he was falsely implicated in the case. Moreover, as a first-time offender, Balwinder Kumar had been in custody since February 15, 2023, and none of the 14 prosecution witnesses had been examined at the time of the bail application.

The High Court’s judgment emphasized the importance of the right to a speedy trial, as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The Court, while considering the provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which deals with the grant of bail in cases involving commercial quantities of contraband, noted that there was substantial compliance with this section in the petitioner’s case.

The Court’s observation, while granting bail, stated, “In this situation, the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act can be diluted to an extent in view of the salutary provisions of Article 21 of the Constitution of India which provides for the right to a speedy trial and the case of the petitioner can be considered for the grant of bail.”

The judgment further outlined the conditions for the petitioner’s release, including regular appearances before the concerned authorities and the deposit of a substantial amount as a financial security, which would be forfeited in case of absence from trial without sufficient cause.

Date of Decision: November 21, 2023

Balwinder Kumar @ Balbinder Singh VS State of Punjab

 

Latest Legal News