Wife Not Entitled to Maintenance When Financially Secure and Dishonest: Punjab & Haryana High Court Boycott of Courts Violates Litigants’ Right to Speedy Justice: Rajasthan High Court Slams Lawyers' Strike Over Working Saturdays Order VI Rule 17 CPC | Proviso Cannot Defeat the Main Provision Which Allows Amendment ‘At Any Stage of Proceedings’: Karnataka High Court Knife Used To Enlarge Child’s Vagina Before Rape: Madhya Pradesh High Court Affirms Death Sentence In ‘Rarest Of Rare’ Case 47 BNSS | Mere Mention of Offence and Sections Is Not Disclosure of Grounds of Arrest: Allahabad High Court Quashes Arrest for Failure to Furnish Written Grounds Quasi-Judicial Officers Aren’t Criminals For Passing Orders: Patna High Court Quashes FIR Against Executive Officer In Mutation Dispute Sections 215 & 379 BNSS | Police Cannot Register FIR Without Judicial Satisfaction Where Alleged Offence Relates to Court Proceedings: Madhya Pradesh High Court Magistrate Empowered To Try Drug Offence Under Section 27(d) Despite It Falling Under Chapter IV: J&K High Court Information Commission Has No Power To Impose Blanket Ban On RTI Applications: Orissa High Court Strikes Down Restriction On Filing Future RTIs Anticipatory Bail Is Not a Shield for Crimes That Threaten Communal Harmony: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Bail Plea in Beef Possession Case Drug And Cosmetic Act | Sample Testing Must Be Completed Within 60 Days Under Rule 45 – Delay Vitiates Entire Prosecution: Bombay High Court 156(3) CrPC | Handwriting Expert's Report May Not Be Final – But It’s Sufficient to Initiate Investigation: Delhi High Court 217 CrPC | Alteration of Charges Is Not a Mere Formality: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Dowry Death Conviction Maintenance Is Not a Charity, It's an Implied Right: Chhattisgarh High Court Cancels Gift Deed for Denial of Care to Elderly Donors Minor Inconsistencies Can't Overturn Disability Claims: Bombay High Court imposes ₹2 lakh costs on HDFC Justice Must Not Be a Casualty of Clerical Oversight: AP High Court Last Seen Is Not Last Word – Circumstantial Evidence Must Be Complete and Compelling: Allahabad High Court Nomination Has Sanctity—Succession Certificate Not Mandatory When Valid Nominee Exists: Supreme Court in GPF Dispute

Section 37 of NDPS Can Be Diluted in View of Salutary Provisions of Article 21 Which Provides For The Right To A Speedy Trial: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Punjab & Haryana High Court, in a judgment delivered on November 21, 2023, granted bail to the accused, Balwinder Kumar, who was facing charges under Section 22/61/85 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The case pertained to the recovery of contraband substances.

The High Court’s decision to grant bail was based on a careful examination of the circumstances, which included the alleged non-compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of the NDPS Act. The petitioner, through his counsel, had vehemently claimed that he was falsely implicated in the case. Moreover, as a first-time offender, Balwinder Kumar had been in custody since February 15, 2023, and none of the 14 prosecution witnesses had been examined at the time of the bail application.

The High Court’s judgment emphasized the importance of the right to a speedy trial, as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The Court, while considering the provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which deals with the grant of bail in cases involving commercial quantities of contraband, noted that there was substantial compliance with this section in the petitioner’s case.

The Court’s observation, while granting bail, stated, “In this situation, the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act can be diluted to an extent in view of the salutary provisions of Article 21 of the Constitution of India which provides for the right to a speedy trial and the case of the petitioner can be considered for the grant of bail.”

The judgment further outlined the conditions for the petitioner’s release, including regular appearances before the concerned authorities and the deposit of a substantial amount as a financial security, which would be forfeited in case of absence from trial without sufficient cause.

Date of Decision: November 21, 2023

Balwinder Kumar @ Balbinder Singh VS State of Punjab

 

Latest Legal News