Writ Jurisdiction Not Appropriate For Adjudicating Complex Title Disputes; Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Ownership: Madhya Pradesh High Court Joint Account Holder Not Liable Under Section 138 NI Act If Not A Signatory To Dishonoured Cheque: Allahabad High Court Private Individuals Accepting Money Can Be Prosecuted Under MPID Act; Nomenclature As 'Loan' Irrelevant: Supreme Court Nomenclature Of Transaction As 'Loan' Irrelevant; If Ingredients Met, It Is A 'Deposit' Under MPID Act: Supreme Court Pleadings Must State Material Facts, Not Evidence; Deficiency In Pleading Cannot Be Raised For First Time In Appeal: Supreme Court Denial Of Remission Cannot Rest Solely On Heinousness Of Crime; Justice Doesn't Permit Permanent Incarceration In Shadow Of Worst Act: Supreme Court Second Application For Rejection Of Plaint Barred By Res Judicata If Earlier Order Attained Finality: Supreme Court Section 6(5) Hindu Succession Act Is A Saving Clause, Not A Jurisdictional Bar To Partition Suits: Supreme Court Sale Of Natural Gas Via Common Carrier Pipelines Is An Inter-State Sale; UP Has No Jurisdiction To Levy VAT: Supreme Court Mediclaim Reimbursement Not Deductible From Motor Accident Compensation; Tortfeasor Can’t Benefit From Claimant’s Prudence: Supreme Court Rules Of Procedure Are Handmaid Of Justice, Not Mistress; Striking Off Defence Under Order XV Rule 5 CPC Is Not Mechanical: Supreme Court Power To Strike Off Tenant's Defense Under Order XV Rule 5 CPC Is Discretionary, Not To Be Exercised Mechanically: Supreme Court Areas Urbanised Before 1959 Don't Require Separate Notification To Fall Under Delhi Rent Control Act: Delhi High Court Police Cannot Freeze Bank Accounts To Perform Compensatory Justice; Direct Nexus With Offence Essential: Bombay High Court FSL Probe Before Electronic Evidence Meets Section 65B Admissibility Standards: Gujarat High Court Court Shouldn't Adjudicate Rights At Stage Of Granting Leave Under Section 92 CPC, Only Prima Facie Case Required: Allahabad High Court Right To Seek Bail Based On Non-Furnishing Of 'Grounds Of Arrest' Applies Only Prospectively From November 6, 2025: Madras High Court Prior Exposure To Accused Before TIP Renders Identification Meaningless: Delhi High Court Acquits Four In Uphaar Cinema Murder Case No Particular Format Prescribed For 'Proposed Resolution' In No-Confidence Motion; Intention Of Members To Be Gathered From Document As A Whole: Orissa High Court Trial Court Cannot Grant Temporary Injunction Without Adverting To Allegations Of Fraud And Collusion: Calcutta High Court "Ganja" Definition Under NDPS Act Excludes Roots & Stems: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail As Seized Weight Included Whole Plants Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Doesn't Displace Section 37 NDPS Mandate In Commercial Quantity Cases: Orissa High Court

Section 37 of NDPS Can Be Diluted in View of Salutary Provisions of Article 21 Which Provides For The Right To A Speedy Trial: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Punjab & Haryana High Court, in a judgment delivered on November 21, 2023, granted bail to the accused, Balwinder Kumar, who was facing charges under Section 22/61/85 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The case pertained to the recovery of contraband substances.

The High Court’s decision to grant bail was based on a careful examination of the circumstances, which included the alleged non-compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of the NDPS Act. The petitioner, through his counsel, had vehemently claimed that he was falsely implicated in the case. Moreover, as a first-time offender, Balwinder Kumar had been in custody since February 15, 2023, and none of the 14 prosecution witnesses had been examined at the time of the bail application.

The High Court’s judgment emphasized the importance of the right to a speedy trial, as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The Court, while considering the provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which deals with the grant of bail in cases involving commercial quantities of contraband, noted that there was substantial compliance with this section in the petitioner’s case.

The Court’s observation, while granting bail, stated, “In this situation, the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act can be diluted to an extent in view of the salutary provisions of Article 21 of the Constitution of India which provides for the right to a speedy trial and the case of the petitioner can be considered for the grant of bail.”

The judgment further outlined the conditions for the petitioner’s release, including regular appearances before the concerned authorities and the deposit of a substantial amount as a financial security, which would be forfeited in case of absence from trial without sufficient cause.

Date of Decision: November 21, 2023

Balwinder Kumar @ Balbinder Singh VS State of Punjab

 

Latest Legal News