Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Section 37 of NDPS Can Be Diluted in View of Salutary Provisions of Article 21 Which Provides For The Right To A Speedy Trial: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Punjab & Haryana High Court, in a judgment delivered on November 21, 2023, granted bail to the accused, Balwinder Kumar, who was facing charges under Section 22/61/85 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The case pertained to the recovery of contraband substances.

The High Court’s decision to grant bail was based on a careful examination of the circumstances, which included the alleged non-compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of the NDPS Act. The petitioner, through his counsel, had vehemently claimed that he was falsely implicated in the case. Moreover, as a first-time offender, Balwinder Kumar had been in custody since February 15, 2023, and none of the 14 prosecution witnesses had been examined at the time of the bail application.

The High Court’s judgment emphasized the importance of the right to a speedy trial, as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The Court, while considering the provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which deals with the grant of bail in cases involving commercial quantities of contraband, noted that there was substantial compliance with this section in the petitioner’s case.

The Court’s observation, while granting bail, stated, “In this situation, the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act can be diluted to an extent in view of the salutary provisions of Article 21 of the Constitution of India which provides for the right to a speedy trial and the case of the petitioner can be considered for the grant of bail.”

The judgment further outlined the conditions for the petitioner’s release, including regular appearances before the concerned authorities and the deposit of a substantial amount as a financial security, which would be forfeited in case of absence from trial without sufficient cause.

Date of Decision: November 21, 2023

Balwinder Kumar @ Balbinder Singh VS State of Punjab

 

Latest Legal News