Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

Section 37 of NDPS Can Be Diluted in View of Salutary Provisions of Article 21 Which Provides For The Right To A Speedy Trial: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Punjab & Haryana High Court, in a judgment delivered on November 21, 2023, granted bail to the accused, Balwinder Kumar, who was facing charges under Section 22/61/85 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The case pertained to the recovery of contraband substances.

The High Court’s decision to grant bail was based on a careful examination of the circumstances, which included the alleged non-compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of the NDPS Act. The petitioner, through his counsel, had vehemently claimed that he was falsely implicated in the case. Moreover, as a first-time offender, Balwinder Kumar had been in custody since February 15, 2023, and none of the 14 prosecution witnesses had been examined at the time of the bail application.

The High Court’s judgment emphasized the importance of the right to a speedy trial, as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The Court, while considering the provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which deals with the grant of bail in cases involving commercial quantities of contraband, noted that there was substantial compliance with this section in the petitioner’s case.

The Court’s observation, while granting bail, stated, “In this situation, the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act can be diluted to an extent in view of the salutary provisions of Article 21 of the Constitution of India which provides for the right to a speedy trial and the case of the petitioner can be considered for the grant of bail.”

The judgment further outlined the conditions for the petitioner’s release, including regular appearances before the concerned authorities and the deposit of a substantial amount as a financial security, which would be forfeited in case of absence from trial without sufficient cause.

Date of Decision: November 21, 2023

Balwinder Kumar @ Balbinder Singh VS State of Punjab

 

Latest Legal News