Inadequate Explanation Under Section 313 CrPC Cannot Be Foundation For Conviction If Prosecution Fails To Prove Case: Allahabad High Court No-Confidence Motion In Housing Societies Fails If 2/3 Majority Not Met; Fractions In Voting Threshold Cannot Be Rounded Down: Bombay High Court Successor Rent Controller Cannot Re-Appreciate Evidence Or Act As Appellate Court Under Review Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Restores Eviction Order Article 21 Overrides PMLA Section 45 Rigors In Cases Of Unduly Long Incarceration Without Trial: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail To SSC Scam ‘Middleman’ Unregistered Family Partition Deed Recording Past Oral Arrangement Doesn't Require Compulsory Registration: Gujarat High Court Private Banks Acting As Authorised Dealers Under FEMA Amenable To Writ Jurisdiction; Can Refuse Transactions For 'Sanctions-Related' Concerns: Gauhati High Court Non-Examination Of Investigating Officer Not Fatal To Prosecution Case If Eyewitness Testimony Is Credible & Trustworthy: Jharkhand High Court Mere Denial Of Signature Insufficient When Execution Is Proved Through Endorsements: Karnataka High Court Restores Specific Performance Decree Sectarianism Claims Can't Discredit Reliable Testimony Of Child Sexual Abuse Victim: Kerala High Court Upholds Madrassa Teacher's Conviction State Must Prove Specific 'Public Interest' To Exempt Projects From Social Impact Assessment Under Section 10A Land Acquisition Act: Telangana High Court Or 2 Rule 2 CPC |Failure To Seek Specific Performance In Earlier Injunction Suit Bars Subsequent Claim; Readiness & Willingness Must Be Continuous: Madras High Court Exoneration In Departmental Proceedings Does Not Result In Automatic Discharge In Criminal Case: Orissa High Court History Sheet Can Be Opened On 'Reasonable Belief' Even Without Conviction, But Must Be Reviewed After 7 Years Of Good Conduct: Rajasthan High Court

“Right to Speedy Trial Entitles First-Time Offenders to Bail” – Punjab & Haryana High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Punjab & Haryana High Court granted bail to two individuals charged under the NDPS Act, emphasizing the importance of a speedy trial. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi passed the judgment on 28th July 2023 in the cases CRM-M-24953-2021 and CRM-M-5334-2023.

“The rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act can be diluted to an extent in view of the salutary provisions of Article 21 of the Constitution of India which provides for the right to a speedy trial,” observed Justice Bedi (Para 8 of the judgment).

The petitioners, Amit Sharma @ Kala and Rajan Kumar, were accused of drug trafficking and had been in custody since 04.05.2020. The Court noted the slow progress of the trial, with only three out of the 22 prosecution witnesses examined so far.

Citing precedents such as Nitish Adhikary @ Bapan Vs. The State of West Bengal and Hasanujjaman & others Vs. The State of West Bengal, the court decided to grant bail. “The case of the petitioners can be considered for the grant of bail,” the Court ruled (Para 8).

While granting bail, the Court imposed certain conditions, including that the petitioners must appear before the police station concerned on the first Monday of every month until the conclusion of the trial. The Court also directed them to deposit a fixed amount with the trial court.

The judgment sets a crucial precedent for the grant of bail in cases with extended pre-trial detention and slow trial progress, especially for first-time offenders.

Date of Decision: 28.07.2023

AMIT SHARMA @ KALA    vs STATE OF PUNJAB    

Latest Legal News