Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

“Right to Speedy Trial Entitles First-Time Offenders to Bail” – Punjab & Haryana High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Punjab & Haryana High Court granted bail to two individuals charged under the NDPS Act, emphasizing the importance of a speedy trial. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi passed the judgment on 28th July 2023 in the cases CRM-M-24953-2021 and CRM-M-5334-2023.

“The rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act can be diluted to an extent in view of the salutary provisions of Article 21 of the Constitution of India which provides for the right to a speedy trial,” observed Justice Bedi (Para 8 of the judgment).

The petitioners, Amit Sharma @ Kala and Rajan Kumar, were accused of drug trafficking and had been in custody since 04.05.2020. The Court noted the slow progress of the trial, with only three out of the 22 prosecution witnesses examined so far.

Citing precedents such as Nitish Adhikary @ Bapan Vs. The State of West Bengal and Hasanujjaman & others Vs. The State of West Bengal, the court decided to grant bail. “The case of the petitioners can be considered for the grant of bail,” the Court ruled (Para 8).

While granting bail, the Court imposed certain conditions, including that the petitioners must appear before the police station concerned on the first Monday of every month until the conclusion of the trial. The Court also directed them to deposit a fixed amount with the trial court.

The judgment sets a crucial precedent for the grant of bail in cases with extended pre-trial detention and slow trial progress, especially for first-time offenders.

Date of Decision: 28.07.2023

AMIT SHARMA @ KALA    vs STATE OF PUNJAB    

Latest Legal News